Cover not available

Review published In: Diachronica
Vol. 34:1 (2017) ► pp.110116

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (20)
References
Arumaa, Peter. 1985. Urslavische Grammatik: Einführung in das vergleichende Studium der slavischen Sprachen. Band 31: Formenlehre. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995, 1–16. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borkovskij, Viktor I. & Petr S. Kuznecov. 2004 [1963]. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka. Moscow: URSS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debrunner, Albert & Jacob Wackernagel. 1975 [1929/1930]. Altindische Grammatik. Band 31: Nominalflexion, Zahlwort, Pronomen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halla-aho, Jussi. 2006. Problems of Proto-Slavic historical nominal morphology (Slavica Helsingensia 26). Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, Eugen. 2013. Historical phonology in service of subgrouping: Two laws of final syllables in the common prehistory of Baltic and Slavonic. Baltistica 481. 161–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Igartua, Iván. 2005. Origen y evolución de la flexión nominal eslava. Bilbao: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Morphological effects of feminine animacy in 16th century Sorbian. Zeitschrift für slavische Philologie 66(1). 61–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Review of How Russian came to be the way it is: A student’s guide to the history of the Russian language, by Tore Nesset (2015). Journal of Historical Linguistics 6(1). 114–123.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krys´ko, Vadim B. 1994. Razvitie kategorii oduševlënnosti v istorii russkogo jazyka. Moscow: Lyceum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1897. Recherches sur l’emploi du génitif-accusatif en vieux-slave. Paris: Bouillon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesset, Tore. 2015. How Russian came to be the way it is: A student’s guide to the history of the Russian language. Bloomington: Slavica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olander, Thomas. 2010. Proto-Indo-European final nasals in Slavic. Scando-Slavica 561. 84–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Proto-Indo-European *-os in Slavic. Russian Linguistics 36(3). 319–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orr, Robert. 2000. Common Slavic nominal morphology: A new synthesis. Bloomington: Slavica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poljakov, Oleg. 1995. Das Problem der balto-slavischen Sprachgemeinschaft (Heidelberg Publikationen zur Slavistik. A. Linguistische Reihe 18). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scholvin, Robert. 1877. Die Declination in den pannonisch-slovenischen Denkmälern des Altkirchenslavischen. Archiv für slavische Philologie 21. 482–569.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shields, Kenneth. 2010. Linguistic typology and the reconstruction of the Indo-European accusative plural. Emerita 78(1). 33–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Villanueva Svensson, Miguel. 2015. Review of Proto-Slavic inflectional morphology: A comparative handbook, by Thomas Olander (2015). Kratylos 601. 103–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viredaz, Rémy. 2009. Two unrecognized vowel phonemes in Proto-Slavic: On Auslautgesetze in North Russian vs. the rest of Slavic. Talk given at the 4th Annual Meeting of the Slavic Linguistics Society, Zadar, September 3–6, 2009.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue