Article published In: Diachronica
Vol. 32:4 (2015) ► pp.494–529
Morphomes and predictability in the history of Romance perfects
Published online: 10 March 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.4.02esh
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.4.02esh
In mediaeval Gallo-Romance, due to regular sound change, the reflexes of Latin perfectum forms develop stem allomorphy linked to alternation between rhizotonic and arrhizotonic stress. Both the allomorphy and the stress alternation are subsequently eradicated. By contrast, in early Italo-Romance, existing stem allomorphy is redistributed by analogy so that, in the reflexes of Latin perfectum forms, stem alternation and stress alternation have the same distribution, a situation which persists into modern Italo-Romance. These developments illustrate a tendency for the exponents of morphomic distributions to be aligned with one another, facilitating reliable inferences about the forms realising different paradigm cells.
References (74)
Ackerman, Farrell, James P. Blevins & Robert Malouf. 2009. Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.) Analogy in grammar, 54–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ackerman, Farrell & Robert Malouf. 2013. Morphological organization: The low conditional entropy conjecture. Language 89(3). 429–464.
Albright, Adam. 2009. Modeling analogy as probabilistic grammar. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.) Analogy in grammar, 185–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alibèrt, Loís. 1976. Gramatica occitana segon los parlars lengadocians. Montpellier: Centre d’Etudes Occitanes.
Allières, Jacques. 2005. Formation et structure de l’occitan ancien. Villeneuve-sur-Lot: Le Luy de France.
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bach, Xavier & Louise Esher. 2015. Morphological evidence for the paradigmatic status of infinitives in French and Occitan. In Dag Haug (ed.), Historical linguistics 2013, 135–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Blevins, Juliette. 2008. Natural and unnatural sound patterns: A pocket field guide. In Klaas Willems & Ludovic De Cuypere (eds.), Naturalness and iconicity in language, 121–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bourciez, Jean. 1927. Recherches historiques et géographiques sur le parfait en Gascogne. Bordeaux: Feret.
Broussard, James F. 1922. Relative value of French verb tenses. The Modern Language Journal 7(1). 37–41.
Bybee, Joan. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5). 425–455.
Bybee, Joan & Mary Brewer. 1980. Explanation in morphophonemics: Changes in Provençal and Spanish preterite forms. Lingua 52(3). 201–242.
Bybee, Joan & Jean E. Newman. 1995. Are stem changes as natural as affixes? Linguistics 33(4). 633–654.
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea & Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy. 2000. Stem alternations as morphological signifiés: Evidence from blur avoidance in Polish nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18(4). 813–835.
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994. Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70(4). 737–788.
Chambon, Jean-Pierre. 2003. Morphologie des parfaits en ancien occitan: à la recherche de la marque et des types. Revue des langues romanes 107(2). 429–497.
Corbett, Greville G. & Matthew Baerman. 2006. Prolegomena to a typology of morphological features. Morphology 16(2). 231–246.
Durand, Jacques. 2009. Essai de panorama phonologique: les accents du Midi. In Luc Baronian & France Martineau (eds.), Le français, d’un continent à l’autre: Mélanges offerts à Yves Charles Morin, 123–170. Quebec: Presses de l’Université Laval.
Enger, Hans-Olav. 2014. Reinforcement in inflection classes: Two cues may be better than one. Word Structure 7(2). 153–181.
Esher, Louise. 2014. Autonomous morphology and extramorphological coherence. Morphology 24(4). 325–350.
Gerken, Louann, Rachel Wilson & William Lewis. 2005. Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories. Journal of Child Language 32(2). 249–268.
Grandgent, Charles Hall. 1909. An outline of the phonology and morphology of old Provençal. Boston: Heath.
Hall, Nancy. 2011. Epenthetic vowels. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 1576–1596. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Jun, Sun-Ah & Cécile Fougeron. 2002. Realizations of accentual phrase in French intonation. Probus 14(1). 147–172.
Loporcaro, Michele. 2011. Syllable, segment and prosody. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, vol. I: Structures, 50–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maiden, Martin. 2000. Di un cambiamento intramorfologico: Origini del tipo dissi dicesti ecc., nell’italoromanzo. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 85(2). 137–171.
. 2004. Verb augments and meaninglessness in Romance morphology. Studi di Grammatica Italiana 221. 1–61.
. 2005. Morphological autonomy and diachrony. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2004, 137–175. Amsterdam: Springer.
. 2009a. Un capitolo di morfologia storica del romeno: Preterito e tempi affini. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 125(2). 273–309.
. 2009b. From pure phonology to pure morphology. The reshaping of the Romance verb. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 381. 45–82.
. 2011a. Morphological persistence. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, vol. I: Structures, 155–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2011b. Morphophonological innovation. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, vol. I: Structures, 216–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2011c. Allomorphy, autonomous morphology and phonological conditioning in the history of the Daco-Romance present and subjunctive. Transactions of the Philological Society 109(1). 59–91.
. 2013a. ‘Semi-autonomous’ morphology? A problem in the history of the Italian (and Romanian) verb. In Silvio Cruschina, Martin Maiden & John Charles Smith (eds.), The boundaries of pure morphology, 24–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2013b. The Latin ‘third stem’ and its Romance descendants. Diachronica 30(4). 492–530.
Marchello-Nizia, Christine. 1995. L’évolution du français. Ordre des mots, démonstratifs, accent tonique. Paris: Armand Colin.
Martin, Guy & Bernard Moulin. 1998. Grammaire provençale et cartes linguistiques. Aix-en-Provence: Comitat Sestian d’Estudis Occitans.
Maschi, Roberta & Laura Vanelli. 2010. Morfologia verbale. In Giampaolo Salvi & Lorenzo Renzi (eds.), Grammatica dell’italiano antico, vol. II1, 1431–1491. Bologna: il Mulino.
Massourre, Jean-Louis. 2006. Le Gascon haut-pyrénéen. Vallées de Luz, de Barèges et de Gavarnie. Villeneuve-sur-Lot: Massourre.
Montermini, Fabio & Olivier Bonami. 2013. Stem spaces and predictability in verbal inflection. Lingue e linguaggio 24(2). 171–190.
Nevins, Andrew, Cilene Rodrigues & Kevin Tang. 2015. The rise and fall of the L-shaped morphome: diachronic and experimental studies. Probus 27(1). 101–155.
O’Neill, Paul. 2014. The morphome in constructive and abstractive models of morphology. Morphology 24(1). 25–70.
Peperkamp, Sharon. 2004. Lexical exceptions in stress systems: Arguments from early language acquisition and adult speech perception. Language 80(1). 98–126.
Rainsford, Thomas. 2011. The emergence of group stress in medieval French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Ph.D dissertation.
Rohlfs, Gerhardt. 1968a. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, vol. 1. Fonetica. Torino: Giulio Einaudi.
. 1968b. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, vol. 2. Morfologia. Torino: Giulio Einaudi.
Romieu, Maurice & André Bianchi. 2005. Gramatica de l’occitan gascon contemporanèu. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.
Ronjat, Jules. 1937. Grammaire istorique des parlers provençaux modernes, vol. III, Morphologie, notes de syntaxe. Montpellier: Société des Langues Romanes.
Round, Erich. 2015. Rhizomorphomes, meromorphomes and metamorphomes. In Matthew Baerman, Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Understanding and measuring morphological complexity, 29–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skårup, Povl. 1997. Morphologie élémentaire de l’ancien occitan. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculaneum Press.
Squartini, Mario & Pier Marco Bertinetto. 2000. The simple and compound past in Romance languages. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 403–439. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stump, Gregory & Raphael Finkel. 2013. Morphological typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (18)
Cited by 18 other publications
Beckwith, Joseph Finnegan
Round, Erich, Louise Esher & Sacha Beniamine
Herce, Borja & Chundra A. Cathcart
Herce, Borja
Herce, Borja
Herce, Borja
Enger, Hans-Olav
2019. Thoughts on morphomes, on a Scandinavian background. In Morphological Variation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 207], ► pp. 159 ff.
Enger, Hans-Olav
Enger, Hans-Olav
Maiden, Martin
2018. New thoughts on an old puzzle. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:2 ► pp. 217 ff.
ESHER, LOUISE
Esher, Louise
Esher, Louise
Esher, Louise
2022. Overlapping subjunctive forms in Gallo- and Ibero-Romance verb paradigms. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 57:1 ► pp. 86 ff.
ESHER, LOUISE
Esher, Louise
2025. Dissimilatory constraints discriminate between variants in analogical change. In Historical Linguistics 2022 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 369], ► pp. 110 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
