Article published In: Diachronica
Vol. 32:3 (2015) ► pp.331–364
Calculating false cognates
An extension of the Baxter & Manaster-Ramer solution and its application to the case of Pre-Greek
Published online: 10 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.3.02kil
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.3.02kil
This paper presents an extension of Baxter & Manaster-Ramer’s (2000) approach to the problem of false cognates in the determination of relationships between languages. Their approach uses a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate how many lexical similarities we can expect to be due to chance between two lexical lists from different languages, and consequently how many are too many to be all false cognates. Although very efficient, their model has the shortcoming of being applicable only to simple lexical lists such as the Swadesh list, with one-to-one semantic correspondences between the individual terms. Here I present a new model that can be applied to any kind of word list, and can include comparisons between multiple terms sharing the same semantic field. After a theoretical description, a controlled test and a contra-test, I finally apply the method to a real test case, investigating the probability of relation between Pre-Greek, the nonIndo-European substrate of classical Greek, and Proto-Basque, Proto-Uralic and ‘Proto-Altaic’.
References (33)
Baxter, William H. 1995. ‘A stronger affinity … than could have been produced by accident’: A probabilistic comparison of Old Chinese and Tibeto-Burman. In William S.-Y. Wang (ed.), The ancestry of the Chinese language (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 8), 1–39. Berkeley: Project on Linguistic Analysis.
. 1998. Response to Oswalt and Ringe. In Joe Salmons & Brian D. Joseph (eds.), Nostratic: Sifting the evidence, 217–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Baxter, William H. & Alexis Manaster-Ramer. 1996. Review of On calculating the factor of chance in language comparison, by Donald A. Ringe, Jr. Diachronica 13(2). 371–384.
. 2000. Beyond lumping and splitting: Probabilistic issues in historical linguistics. In Colin Renfrew, April McMahon & Larry Trask (eds.), Time depth in historical linguistics, 167–188. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Cortelazzo, Manlio & Paolo Zolli. 1979. Dizionario etimologico della lingua italiana, 1st edn. Bologna: Zanichelli.
Duhoux, Yves. 2007. Pre-Greek languages: Indirect evidence. In Anastasios-Phoivos Christidēs, Maria Arapopoulou & Maria Chritē (eds.), A history of ancient Greek: From the beginnings to late antiquity, 223–228. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dunn, Michael & Angela Terrill. 2012. Assessing the lexical evidence for a Central Solomons Papuan family using the Oswalt Monte Carlo Test. Diachronica 29(1). 1–27.
Dybo, Anna V. & Georgiy Starostin. 2008. In defense of the comparative method, or the end of the Vovin controversy. Aspects of Comparative Linguistics 31. 109–258.
Facchetti, Giulio M. 2003. Creta minoica: sulle tracce delle più antiche scritture d’Europa. Florence: LSOlschki.
Forster, Peter & Colin Renfrew (eds.). 2006. Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge/Oxbow Books/David Brown Book Co.
Furnée, Edzard J. 1972. Die wichtigsten konsonantischen Erscheinungen des Vorgriechischen: Mit einem Appendix über den Vokalismus. The Hague: Mouton.
Georg, Stefan. 2004. Review of Etymological dictionary of the Altaic languages
. Diachronica 21(2). 445–450.
Georg, Stefan, Peter A. Michalove, Alexis Manaster-Ramer & Paul J. Sidwell. 1999. Telling general linguists about Altaic. Journal of Linguistics 35(1). 65–98.
Heggarty, Paul. 2005. Enigmas en el origen de las lenguas andinas: aplicando nuevas técnicas a las incógnitas por resolver. Revista Andina 401. 9–57.
Holman, Eric W., Søren Wichmann, Cecil H. Brown, Viveka Velupillai, André Müller & Dik Bakker. 2008. Explorations in automated language classification. Folia Linguistica 42(2). 331–354.
Kessler, Brett & Annukka Lehtonen. 2006. Multilateral comparison and significance testing of the Indo-Uralic question. In Peter Forster & Colin Renfrew (eds.), Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages, 33–42. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
. 2007. Word similarity metrics and multilateral comparison. In John Nerbonne, T. Mark Ellison & Grzegorz Kondrak (eds.),
Proceedings of the Ninth Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Morphology and Phonology
, 6–14. Prague: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Kondrak, Grzegorz. 2009. Identification of cognates and recurrent sound correspondences in word lists. Traitement automatique des langues 50(2). 201–235.
Martirosyan, Hrach K. 2010. Etymological dictionary of the Armenian inherited lexicon. Leiden: Brill.
Rachewiltz, Igor de, Volker Rybatzki & Jinfu Hong. 2010. Introduction to Altaic philology: Turkic, Mongolian, Manchu. Leiden: Brill.
Renfrew, Colin. 1998. Word of Minos: The Minoan contribution to Mycenaean Greek and the linguistic geography of the Bronze Age Aegean. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 8(2). 239–264.
Rocławski, Bronisław. 1986. Zarys fonologii, fonetyki, fonotaktyki i fonostatystyki współczesnego języka polskiego. Gdańsk: Wydaw Uczelniane UG.
Sihler, Andrew L. 1995. New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simone, Carlo De. 2007. Greek and Etruscan. In Anastasios-Phoivos Christidēs, Maria Arapopoulou & Maria Chritē (eds.), A history of ancient Greek: From the beginnings to late antiquity, 786–791. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Starostin, Sergei, Anna Dybo & Oleg Mudrak. 2003. Etymological dictionary of the Altaic languages. Leiden: Brill.
Starostin, Sergei. 2005. Response to Stefan Georg’s review of the Etymological dictionary of the Altaic languages
. Diachronica 22(2). 451–454.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Kassian, Alexei S., George Starostin, Mikhail Zhivlov & Sergey A. Spirin
2023. Calibrated weighted permutation test detects ancient language connections in the Circumpolar area
(Chukotian-Nivkh and Yukaghir-Samoyedic)*. Journal of Historical Linguistics
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.