Cover not available

Article published In: Diachronica
Vol. 32:3 (2015) ► pp.293–330

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

On syntactic intervention in Chinese denominal verbs

A diachronic perspective

 | South China Normal University
Published online: 10 December 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.3.01che
The derivation of Chinese denominal verbs has undergone a diachronic shift from freedom in Archaic Chinese to restriction in Post-Archaic Chinese. While denominal verbs in Archaic Chinese can be conveniently accommodated in a pragmatic account, those in Post-Archaic Chinese only yield to a syntactic account. The diachronic shift has arguably resulted from syntactic intervention: only those denominal verbs in Archaic Chinese that can possibly be derived in syntax have survived into Post-Archaic Chinese. In support of this hypothesis is the fact that the prefix *s- and qù shēng bié yì (“falling tone for sense distinction”), responsible for verbalization of nouns in Archaic Chinese, have ceased to operate and given way to zero categories in Post-Archaic Chinese, and the denominal verbs in Post-Archaic Chinese exhibit transparent semantic structures. These findings support the general view about the lexicon-syntax interface that word formation should not be reduced to either the lexicon or syntax alone.
References (69)
Arad, Maya. 2003a. Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(4). 737–778. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003b. Why syntax matters. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 321. 83–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart. 1998. Word formation in Old Chinese. In Jerome L. Packard (ed.), New approaches to Chinese word-formation: Morphology, phonology, lexicon in Modern and Ancient Chinese, 35–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005a. Structuring sense, vol I: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005b. Structuring sense, vol II: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chan, Marjorie K.M. & James H-Y. Tai. 1995. From nouns to verbs: Verbalization in Chinese dialects and East Asian languages. NACCL [North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics] 6(2). 49–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Jie & Howard Lasnik. Manuscript. Parametric variations in English and Mandarin denominal verb derivation.
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. & Herbert H. Clark. 1979. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 511. 767–811. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deng, Ming. 2011. Cong fangfalun de shijiao lun gu hanyu “cilei huoyong” shuo de pianwu [A methodological perspective on the problems in the view of free word-class shift in Ancient Chinese]. Yuwen Yanjiu [Chinese Studies] 21. 35–39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Edwin Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Don, Jan. 2005. Roots, deverbal nouns and denominal verbs. In Geert Booij, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli, Salvatore Sgroi & Sergio Scalise (eds.), Morphology and linguistic typology: On-line Proceedings of Mediterranean Morphology Meeting 41, 91–104. Bologna: University of Bologna. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dong, Xiufang. 2002. Cihuihua: Hanyu shuangyinzi de yansheng he fazhan [Lexicalization: Genesis and development of disyllabic words in Chinese]. Chengdu, China: Sichuan Renmin Chubanshe [Sichuan People’s Press].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli. 1998. Prosodic structure and compound words in Classical Chinese. In Jerome L. Packard (ed.), New approaches to Chinese word-formation: Morphology, phonology, lexicon in Modern and Ancient Chinese, 197–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Qing dongci yiwei yu gujin hanyu de dongbin guanxi [Light-verb movement in Modern and Classical Chinese]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Science] 11. 3–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Historical syntax of Chinese. In C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Andrew Simpson (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 537–575. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry & Ernie Lepore. 1999. Impossible words? Linguistic Inquiry 30(3). 445–453. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley. 2006. On the licensing of causatives of directed motion: Waltzing Matilda all over. Studia Linguistica 60(2). 121–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & S. Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale & S. Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. On the complex nature of simple predicators. In Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan & Peter Sells (eds.), Complex predicates, 29–65. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. A response to Fodor and Lepore, ‘Impossible words?’ Linguistic Inquiry 30(3). 453–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2005. How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English. In Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds.), The syntax of aspect, 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Compounding in distributed morphology. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Stekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 129–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1997. On lexical structure and syntactic projection. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 31. 45–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jin, Haiqiang. 2011. Gu jin hanyu mingci dongyong bijiao yanjiao [The comparative study of denominal verbs in Ancient and Modern Chinese]. Yanbian, China: Yanbian University MA thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jin, Wen. 2011. A statistical argument for the homophony avoidance approach to the disyllabification of Chinese. NACCL [North American Conference on Chinese Linguistic] 23(1). 35–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lapointe, Steven G. 1980. A theory of grammatical agreement. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 1988. On double object constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 335–391.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Thematic hierarchies in argument realization. In Beth Levin & Malka Rappaport Hovav (eds.), Argument realization, 154–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Zuofeng. 2005. Gudai hanyu yufa xue [A grammar of Old Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan [Commercial Press].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing morphology: Word formation in syntactic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Irvine, CA: University of California Irvine doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Alexis Dimitriadis, Laura Siegel, Clarissa Surek-Clark & Alexander Williams (eds.), UPenn working papers in Linguistics [UPWPL] 4(2). 201–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume & Gemma Rigau. 2002. A Minimalist account of conflation processes: Parametric variation at the lexicon-syntax interface. In Artemis Alexiadou (ed.), Theoretical approaches to universals, 211–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mei, Tsu-lin. 1980. Sisheng bieyi zhong de shijian cengci [The temporal aspect of the use of tones for semantic distinction]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Chinese Language] 61. 427–443.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. The causative and denominative functions of the *s-prefix in Old Chinese. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Sinology, 33–51. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
. 2008. Shanggu Hanyu dongci zhuo qing bieyi de laiyuan [The origin of voicing alternations in Old Chinese verbs]. Minzu Yuwen [Minority Languages of China] 31. 3–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The causative *s- and nominalizing *-s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 1–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peyraube, A. 1996. Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. In C.-T. James Huang & Y.-H. Audrey Li (eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161–213. New York: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Tal Siloni. 2005. The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3). 389–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 2004. Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent. 1999. The roots of Old Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent & William H. Baxter. 2012. Reconstructing the *s- prefix in Old Chinese. Language and Linguistics (13)11. 29–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, Gerald. 1988. Zero derivation and the overt analogue criterion. In Michael ­Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology, 155–175. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schuessler, Axel. 2007. ABC etymological dictionary of Old Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan. 2010. Cong “yanyuan shi ge dongci” shuoqi–mingci dongyong he dongci mingyong de buduicheng [Starting from “an actor is a verb”: On the asymmetry between denominal verbs and deverbal nouns]. Dangdai Xiuci Xue [Contemporary Rhetoric] 11. 1–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, Li. 2004. Aspect agreement and light verbs in Chinese: A comparison with Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 131. 141–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shu, Zhiwu. 2002. Cong sisheng bieyi kan hanyu shengdiao de fazhan [On the development of Chinese tones in the perspective of tones distinguishing meaning]. Yuyan Yanjiu [Language Studies] 41. 54–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Yuwen. 1992. Lüe lun sisheng bieyi yu zhonggu kouyu zhijian de guanxi [On the relationship between tones distinguishing meaning and Medieval Chinese speech]. Hubei Daxue Xuebao [Journal of Hubei University] 61. 75–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret J. 1990. Phrase structure in natural language. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tai, James H–Y. 1983. On the absence of denominal verbs in Chinese. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America . Minneapolis, MN. Dec. 28th.
. 1997. Category shifts and word-formation redundancy rules in Chinese. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 31. 435–468.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. Cambridge, MA: MIT doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Kezhong. 1989. Gu hanyu cilei huoyong [Free word class shift in Ancient Chinese]. Changsha: Hunan Renmin Chubanshe [Hunan People’s Press].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Li. 1981. Gudai hanyu [Ancient Chinese]. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju [China Book Company].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wei, Pei-chuan. 2003. Shanggu hanyu dao zhonggu hanyu yufa de zhongyao fazhan [Important grammatical developments from Archaic to Medieval Chinese]. In Da’an He (ed.), Gujin tongse: Hanyu de lishi yu fazhan [The history and development of Chinese language], 75–106. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Zongyi. 1995. Gu hanyu ‘cilei huoyong’ shuo xianyi [Questioning the view of ‘free word-class shift’ in Archaic Chinese]. Beifang Luncong [The Northern Forum] 51. 82–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Mattiola, Simone & Andrea Sansò
2024. A typology of denominal verb formation strategies. Language and Linguistics Compass 18:3 DOI logo
Cheng, Jie & Howard Lasnik
2016. Parametric variations in Mandarin and English denominal verb derivation. Lingua 180 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue