Article published In: Diachronica
Vol. 32:2 (2015) ► pp.268–276
notes / notizen — discussion / diskussion
Reply to Sampson (2013)
Published online: 15 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.2.04kap
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.2.04kap
References (25)
Becker, Michael, Nihan Ketrez & Andrew Nevins. 2011. The surfeit of the stimulus: Analytic biases filter lexical statistics in Turkish laryngeal alternations. Language 87(1). 84–125.
Blevins, Juliette & Andrew Wedel. 2009. Inhibited sound change: An evolutionary approach to lexical competition. Diachronica 26(2). 143–183.
Bouchard-Cotê, Alexandre, David Hall, Thomas L. Griffiths & Dan Klein. 2013. Automated reconstruction of ancient languages using probabilistic models of sound change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(11). 4224–4229.
Crosswhite, Katherine. 1999. Intra-paradigmatic homophony avoidance in two dialects of Slavic. In Matthew K. Gordon (ed.), Papers in phonology 2 (UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 1), 48–67. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Department of Linguistics.
Gessner, Suzanne & Gunnar Ólafur Hansson. 2004. Anti-homophony effects in Dakelh (Carrier) valence morphology. In Marc Ettlinger, Nicholas Fleischer & Mischa Park-Doob (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 93–104. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Gilliéron, Jules. 1918. Généalogie des mots qui désignent l’abeille d’apres l’atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: É. Champion.
Hayes, Bruce & James White. 2013. Phonological naturalness and phonotactic learning. Linguistic Inquiry 44(1). 45–75.
Ichimura, Larry K. 2006. Anti-homophony blocking and its productivity in transparadigmatic relations. Boston, MA: Boston University dissertation.
Kaplan, Abby & Yuka Muratani. Forthcoming. Categorical and gradient homophony avoidance: Evidence from Japanese. Laboratory Phonology 6(2).
Kenstowicz, Michael. 2002. Paradigmatic uniformity and contrast. In Aniko Csirmaz, Zhiqiang Li, Andrew Nevins, Olga Vaysman & Michael Wagner (eds.), Phonological answers (and their corresponding questions) (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 42), 141–163. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Kisseberth, Charles W. & Mohammad Imam Abasheikh. 1974. A case of systematic avoidance of homonyms. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 4(1). 107–124.
Mondon, Jean-François. 2009. The nature of homophony and its effects on diachrony and synchrony. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
Moreton, Elliott. 1997. Phonotactic rules in speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102(5). 3091.
Muratani, Yuka. 2014. Categorical and gradient homophony avoidance: Evidence from Japanese. Paper presented at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Linguistics Colloquium, March 22.
Paster, Mary. 2010. The role of homophony avoidance in morphology: A case study from Mixtec. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 211. 29–39.
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2013. A counterexample to homophony avoidance. Diachronica 30(4). 579–591.
Silverman, Daniel. 2010. Neutralization and anti-homophony in Korean. Journal of Linguistics 46(2). 453–482.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Morris, Richard E.
Ko, Edwin
Rangelov, Tihomir, Mary Walworth & Julie Barbour
2023. A multifaceted approach to understanding unexpected sound change. Diachronica 40:3 ► pp. 384 ff.
Sims-Williams, Helen & Hans-Olav Enger
Sampson, Geoffrey
2019. An unaddressed phonological contradiction. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 6:2 ► pp. 221 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
