Article published In: Diachronica
Vol. 32:1 (2015) ► pp.69–72
Where do all the motion verbs come from?
The speed of development of manner verbs and path verbs in Indo-European
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 30 March 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.1.03ver
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.1.03ver
The last four decades have seen huge progress in the description and analysis of cross-linguistic diversity in the encoding of motion (Talmy 1985, 1991, Slobin 1996, 2004). Comparisons between satellite-framed and verb-framed languages suggest that satellite-framed languages typically have a larger manner of motion verb lexicon (swim, dash), while verb-framed languages typically have a larger path of motion verb lexicon (enter, cross) (Slobin 2004, Verkerk 2013, 2014b). This paper investigates how differences between the motion verb lexicons of satellite-framed and verb-framed languages emerge. Phylogenetic comparative methods adopted from biology and an etymological study are used to investigate manner verb lexicons and path verb lexicons in an Indo-European dataset. I show that manner verbs and path verbs typically have different types of etymological origins and that manner verbs emerge faster in satellite-framed subgroups, while path verbs emerge faster in verb-framed subgroups.
References (59)
Adams, James Noel. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aske, Jon. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In Kira Hall, Michael Meacham & Richard Shapiro (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 1–14.
Beekes, Robert S.P. 2011. Comparative Indo-European linguistics: An introduction, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Berman, Ruth A. & Dan I. Slobin (eds.). 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bouckaert, Remco, Philippe Lemey, Michael Dunn, Simon J. Greenhill, Alexander V. Alekseyenko, Alexei J. Drummond, Russell D. Gray, Marc A. Suchard & Quentin D. Atkinson. 2012. Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 3371. 957–960.
Brown, Cecil H. 1983. Where do cardinal direction terms come from? Anthropological Linguistics 25(2). 121–161.
Cannon, Garland. 1978. Statistical etymologies of new words in American English. Journal of English Linguistics 121. 12–18.
Cifuentes Férez, Paula. 2010. The semantics of the English and the Spanish motion verb lexicons. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 81. 233–271.
Clackson, James. 2007. Indo-European linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Delbrück, Berthold. 1888. Altindische syntax. Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Dickey, Stephen M. 2010. Common Slavic “indeterminate” verbs of motion were really manner-of-motion verbs. In Victoria Hasko & Renee Perelmutter (eds.), New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion, 67–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Drummond, Alexei J., Marc A. Suchard, Dong Xie & Andrew Rambaut. 2012. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29(8). 1969–1973.
Dunn, Michael, Simon J. Greenhill, Stephen C. Levinson & Russell D. Gray. 2011. Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature 4731. 79–82.
Dunn, Michael, Kate Bellamy, Chundra Cathcart, Andrew Garrett, Julia Ludewig & Cornelia van Scherpenberg. Forthcoming. IELex: An Indo-European lexical database for phylogenetic analysis. PloS One.
Dyen, Isodore, Joseph B. Kruskal & Paul Black. 1992. An Indo-European classification: A lexicostatistical experiment. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 82(1). iii–132.
Fanego, Teresa. 2012. Motion events in English: The emergence and diachrony of manner salience from Old English to Late Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 331. 29–85.
Filipović, Luna. 2007. Talking about motion: A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Green, Peter J. 1995. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82(4). 711–732.
Greenberg, Marc L. 2010. PIE inheritance and word-formational innovation in Slavic motion verbs in -i-. In Victoria Hasko & Renee Perelmutter (eds.), New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion, 111–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hewson, John & Vit Bubenik. 2006. From case to adposition: The development of configurational syntax in Indo-European languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hickmann, Maya, Henriëtte Hendriks, Efstathia Soroli, Tatiana Iakovleva & Yinglin Ji. Forthcoming. Space and language typology: Encoding motion across languages.
Hofmann, Johann B. & Anton Szantyr. 1965. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Huelsenbeck, John P., Fredrik Ronquist, Rasmus Nielsen & Jonathan P. Bollback. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 2941. 2310–2314.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2004. Motion events in Basque narratives. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, 89–111. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kass, Robert E. & Adrian E. Raftery. 1995. Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90(430). 773–795.
Nakhleh, Luay, Don Ringe & Tandy Warnow. 2005. Perfect phylogenetic networks: A new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language 81(2). 382–420.
Nicolas, Christian. 2005. Sic enim appello...: essau sur l’autonymie terminologique gréco-latine chez Cicéron. Leuven: Peeters.
Özçalışkan, Şeyda & Dan I. Slobin. 2003. Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in English and Turkish. In Sumru Özsoy, Didar Akar, Mine Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan & Ayhan Aksu-Koç (eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, 259–270. Istanbul: Bogazici University Press.
Pagel, Mark. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zoologica Scriptica 261. 331–348.
Pagel, Mark, Andrew Meade & Daniel Barker. 2004. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 53(5). 673–684.
Ringe, Don, Tandy Warnow & Ann Taylor. 2002. Indo-European and computational cladistics. Transactions of the Philological Society 1001. 59–129.
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 1981. Grammatik des Klassisch-Armenischen mit sprachvergleichenden Erläuterungen. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.
Slobin, Dan I. 1996. Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In Masayoshi Shibitani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 195–219. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
. 1997. Mind, code, and text. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón, 437–467. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. 2005. Relating narrative events in translation. In Dorit Diskin Ravid & Hava Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman, 115–129. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Christopher Johnson, Laurel A. Sutton & Ruth Shields (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–519. Berkeley: University of California.
Turner, Ralph Lilley. 1962-1985. A comparative dictionary of Indo-Aryan languages. London: Oxford University Press.
Uhlenbeck, Christiaan Cornelis. 1899. Kurzgefasstes etymologisches Wörterbuch der altindischen Sprache. Amsterdam: Müller.
Vaan, Michiel de. 2008. Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages. Leiden: Brill.
Venditti, Chris, Andrew Meade & Mark Pagel. 2011. Multiple routes to mammalian diversity. Nature 4791. 393–396.
Verkerk, Annemarie. 2013. Scramble, scurry and dash: The correlation between motion event encoding and manner verb lexicon size in Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change 3(2): 169–217. Special issue, “Phylogeny and beyond: Quantitative diachronic approaches to language diversity”, edited by Michael Dunn.
. 2014a. Diachronic change in motion event encoding. Journal of Historical Linguistics 4(1). 40–83.
. 2014b. The correlation between motion event encoding and path verb lexicon size in Indo-European. Folia Linguistica Historica 351. 307–358.
. 2014c. Where Alice fell into: Motion events in a parallel corpus. In Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), Aggregating dialectology, typology, and register analysis: Linguistic variation in text and speech, 324–354. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Vidaković, Ivana. 2012. He walked up the pole with arms and legs: Typology in second language acquisition. In Luna Filipović & Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures: Linguistic diversity, 233–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (17)
Cited by 17 other publications
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader, Sameerah Saeed & Bashayer Alotaibi
Pedro, Pedro Mateo
Aktan-Erciyes, Aslı, Emir Akbuğa, Feyza Nur Dik & Tilbe Göksun
Moran, Steven, Eitan Grossman & Annemarie Verkerk
Łozińska, Joanna
Anastasio, Simona & Sandra Benazzo
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Jaume Mateu
Thompson, Bill, Seán G. Roberts & Gary Lupyan
Soroli, Efstathia, Maya Hickmann & Henriëtte Hendriks
2019. Casting an eye on motion events. In The Semantics of Dynamic Space in French [Human Cognitive Processing, 66], ► pp. 250 ff.
Shi, Wenlei, Wanglong Yang & Henghua Su
2018. The typological change of motion expressions in Chinese revisited. Studies in Language 42:4 ► pp. 847 ff.
Łozińska, Joanna & Barbara Pietrewicz
Egan, Thomas & Hildegunn Dirdal
2017. Lexis in contrast today. In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191], ► pp. 1 ff.
Huber, Judith
2017. The early life of borrowed path verbs in English. In Motion and Space across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 59], ► pp. 177 ff.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
2017. Motion and semantic typology. In Motion and Space across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 59], ► pp. 13 ff.
Slobin, Dan I.
2017. Typologies and language use. In Motion and Space across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 59], ► pp. 419 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
