Cover not available

Article published In: Diachronica
Vol. 32:1 (2015) ► pp.34–68

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Competing modals

Beyond (inter)subjectification

 | University of Antwerp
Published online: 30 March 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.1.02nuy
This paper presents the results of a corpus-based diachronic investigation into the semantic evolution of the Dutch modals kunnen “can”, mogen “may” and moeten “must”, revealing an interaction between processes of (inter)subjectification and of semantic competition (‘no synonymy’). Mogen and kunnen do, but moeten does not, show an evolution in terms of (inter)subjectification. But developments in mogen and kunnen also show an effect of the fact that historically they have been competing for the same semantic ground. There is no comparable competition for semantic ground in moeten. This strongly suggests an interaction between the ‘no synonymy’ principle and (inter)subjectification, whereby the former may actually trigger the latter.
References (54)
Anttila, Raimo. 2003. Analogy: The warp and woof of cognition. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 425–440. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 21. 119–127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form (Typological Studies in Language 9). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byloo, Pieter. 2009. Modality and negation. Antwerp: University of Antwerp dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byloo, Pieter & Jan Nuyts. 2011. The diachrony of Dutch mogen . Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 1131. 1–192.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Meaning change in the Dutch core modals: (Inter)subjectification in a grammatical paradigm. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 461. 85–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. The diachrony of Dutch moeten. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics.
CD-ROM Middelnederlands. 1998. Den Haag: SDU Uitgevers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1964. Pour une sémantique diachronique structurale. Travaux de linguistique et de littérature 21. 139–186.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diepeveen, Janneke, Ronny Boogaart, Jenneke Brantjes, Pieter Byloo, Theo Janssen & Jan Nuyts. 2006. Modale uitdrukkingen in Belgisch-Nederlands en Nederlands-Nederlands. Münster, Germany: Nodus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1997. The theory of functional grammar, vol. 11. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duinhoven, A.M. 1997. Middelnederlandse syntaxis, vol. 2, De werkwoordgroep. Groningen: Nijhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foley, William & Robert Van Valin. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan, Katrien Deygers, Hilde van Aken, Vicky van den Heede & Dirk Speelman. 2000. Het ConDiv-corpus geschreven Nederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde 51. 356–363.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1980. The iconicity of grammar. Language 561. 515–540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1989. Layers and operators in functional grammar. Journal of Linguistics 251. 127–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 2003. Analogical change. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 441–460. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroesch, Samuel. 1926. Analogy as a factor in semantic change. Language 21. 35–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 11. 5–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Subjectification, grammaticalization and conceptual archetypes. In Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds.), Subjectification, 17–40. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1985. The influence of semantic fields on semantic change. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical semantics — Historical word formation, 283–296. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José. 2010. Subjectification and intersubjectification. In Andreas Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 127–163. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2009. Modality in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nederlandse Taalunie. 2004. Corpus Gesproken Nederlands, Version 2.0. Leiden: TST-Centrale INL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001b. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 383–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The modal confusion: On terminology and the concepts behind it. In Alex Klinge & Henrik H. Müller (eds.), Modality: Studies in form and function, 5–38. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Modality. In William Frawley (ed.), The expression of modality, 1–26. Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Kunnen diachroon. Taal en Tongval 591. 118–148.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009a. The ‘one-commitment-per-clause’ principle and the cognitive status of qualificational categories. Linguistics 471. 141–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. The Dutch modals and (de)grammaticalization. In Stef Slembrouck, Miriam Taverniers & Mieke van Herreweghe (eds.), From will to well, 347–355. Ghent: Academia Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction 51. 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. De-auxiliarization without de-modalization in the Dutch core modals: A case of collective degrammaticalization? Language Sciences 361. 124–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. Analyses of the modal meanings. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Oxford handbook of mood and modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nuyts, Jan, Pieter Byloo & Janneke Diepeveen. 2010. On deontic modality, directivity, and mood: The case of Dutch mogen and moeten . Journal of Pragmatics 421. 16–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oertel, Hanns. 1901. Lectures on the study of language. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ostaeyen, Gert Van & Jan Nuyts. 2004. De diachronie van kunnen . Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 1091. 1–186.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pijnenburg, W.J.J., K.H. van Dalen-Oskam, K.A.C. Depuydt & T.H. Schoonheim (eds.). 2001. Vroegmiddelnederlands woordenboek. Leiden: Gopher Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stern, Gustaf. 1931. Meaning and change of meaning, with special reference to the English language. Gothenburg: Elander.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English. Language 651. 31–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein & Suzanne Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectification, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth & Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trier, Jost. 1931. Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valin, Robert Van & Randy LaPolla. 1997. Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (26)

Cited by 26 other publications

Olga A. Boginskaya
2025. Translating Deontic Modality: Semantic and Formal Convergences and Discrepancies. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics 16:3 ► pp. 744 ff. DOI logo
Kitazaki, Yuho
2025. Pathways to de(inter)subjectification in Japanese. In Semantic-Pragmatic Change from Intersubjective to Textual Meanings [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 353], ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Teles Guimarães, Aléxia & Thomas Hoelbeek
2025. Littéralement moi : subjectivisation de l’adverbe littéralement en français contemporain. Langue française n° 227:3 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Almela-Sánchez, Moisés
2024. Daniela Pettersson-Traba, The development of the concept of SMELL in American English: A usage-based view of near-synonymy (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 51). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2022. Pp. xviii + 270. ISBN 9783110792201.. English Language and Linguistics 28:3 ► pp. 657 ff. DOI logo
Cai, Yingying & Hendrik De Smet
2024. Are categories’ cores more isomorphic than their peripheries?. Frontiers in Communication 9 DOI logo
Lorenz, David
2024. Potential grammaticalization of epistemic phrases. Functions of Language 31:3 ► pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Nuyts, Jan
2024. On the link between grammaticalization and subjectification. Studies in Language 48:3 ► pp. 608 ff. DOI logo
Rosemeyer, Malte
2024. Data-driven identification of situated meanings in corpus data using Latent Class Analysis. Open Linguistics 10:1 DOI logo
Coussé, Evie & Gerlof Bouma
2022. Semantic scope restrictions in complex verb constructions in Dutch. Linguistics 60:1 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Inglese, Guglielmo
2022. How do middle voice markers and valency reducing constructions interact? Typological tendencies and diachronic considerations. Folia Linguistica 56:2 ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Kolyaseva, Alena
2022. The Russian prepositional TIPA and VRODE in online student discourse: evidence of attraction?. Linguistics 60:5 ► pp. 1451 ff. DOI logo
Nesset, Tore
2022. Language Change and Cognitive Linguistics, DOI logo
Pettersson-Traba, Daniela
2022. Distributional changes in synonym sets. In English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 359], ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Koohkan, Sepideh & Jan Nuyts
2021. Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification in an Iranian modal verb: A paradox resolved by Dutch. Australian Journal of Linguistics 41:4 ► pp. 389 ff. DOI logo
Tantucci, Vittorio
2021. Language and Social Minds, DOI logo
Abraham, Werner
2020. Modality in Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics, DOI logo
Gregersen, Sune
2020. Language death, modality, and functional explanations. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 52:1 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Thegel, Miriam & Josefin Lindgren
2020. Subjective and intersubjective modality: a quantitative approach to Spanish modal verbs. Studia Neophilologica 92:1 ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Caers, Wim & Sune Gregersen
2019. Wat mutt, dat mutt*. Nederlandse Taalkunde 24:3 ► pp. 399 ff. DOI logo
Fonteyn, Lauren & Charlotte Maekelberghe
2018. Competing motivations in the diachronic nominalization of English gerunds. Diachronica 35:4 ► pp. 487 ff. DOI logo
Nesset, Tore & Anastasia Makarova
2018. The decade construction rivalry in Russian. Diachronica 35:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Nuyts, Jan, Henri-Joseph Goelen & Wim Caers
2018. Hoeven diachroon. Taal en Tongval 70:1 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Smet, Hendrik De, Frauke D’hoedt, Lauren Fonteyn & Kristel Van Goethem
2018. The changing functions of competing forms: Attraction and differentiation. Cognitive Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
FONTEYN, LAUREN
2017. The aggregate and the individual: thoughts on what non-alternating authors reveal about linguistic alternations – a response to Petré. English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Harmes, Ingeborg
2017. A synchronic and diachronic study of the Dutch Auxiliary “Zou(den)”. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Revisiting Modality [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 40], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue