Consensus and the lexicon in historical linguistics: Rejoinder to “Basic vocabulary and Bayesian phylolinguistics”

Donohue, Mark; Denham, Tim; Oppenheimer, Stephen

doi:10.1075/dia.29.4.06don

Article published In: Diachronica
Vol. 29:4 (2012) ► pp.538–546

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Consensus and the lexicon in historical linguistics

Rejoinder to “Basic vocabulary and Bayesian phylolinguistics”

Mark Donohue | The Australian National University

Tim Denham | La Trobe University

Stephen Oppenheimer | University of Oxford

Published online: 14 December 2012

https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.29.4.06don

Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Order by:

Donohue, Mark & Tim Denham

2020. Becoming Austronesian. In Austronesian Undressed [Typological Studies in Language, 129], ► pp. 447 ff.

Hock, Hans Heinrich

2020. The Steppes, Anatolia, India? Migration, Archaeology, Genomes, and Indo-European. Journal of Asian Linguistic Anthropology 2:4 ► pp. 1 ff.

Denham, Tim

2018. Domesticate Dispersal, Human Agency and Connectivity in Island Southeast Asia during the Holocene. In Globalization in Prehistory, ► pp. 80 ff.

Joseph, Brian D.

2017. Historical Linguistics. In The Handbook of Linguistics, ► pp. 299 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.