Cover not available

Introduction published In: Diachrony of Tone
Edited by Sandra Auderset, Rikker Dockum and Ryan Gehrmann
[Diachronica 42:3/4] 2025
► pp. 267277

References (40)
References
Auderset, Sandra. 2024. Rates of change and phylogenetic signal in Mixtec tone. Language Dynamics and Change 14(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Confronting challenges in historical linguistics: Quantitative approaches to dialect area subgrouping and tone change in Mixtec. Santa Barbara: University of California Santa Barbara PhD Thesis.
Baart, Joan. 2014. Tone and stress in north-west Indo-Aryan: A survey. In Caspers et al. (eds.), Above and beyond the segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics, 1–13. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beam de Azcona, Rosemary G. 2007. Problems in Zapotec tone reconstruction. In Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 3–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bennett, Ryan. 2016. Mayan phonology. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(10). 469–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire. 2018. Computational phylogenetics. Annual Review of Linguistics 41. 281–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cahill, Michael. 2011. Tonal diversity in languages of Papua New Guinea. SIL Electronic Working Papers. [URL]
Campbell, Eric W. 2021. Why is tone change still poorly understood, and how might documentation of less-studied tone languages help? In Patience Epps, Danny Law and Na’ama Pat-El (eds.), Historical linguistics and endangered languages: Exploring diversity in language change, 15–40. New York and London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W., Patrice Speeter Beddor, Kerby Shedden, Will Styler and Daan Wissing. 2018. Plosive voicing in Afrikaans: Differential cue weighting and tonogenesis. Journal of Phonetics 661. 185–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dockum, Rikker. 2018. Phylogeny in phonology: How Tai sound systems encode their past. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting on Phonology. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. The tonal Comparative Method: Tai tone in diachronic perspective. New Haven: Yale University PhD thesis.
Dürr, Michael. 1990. A preliminary reconstruction of the Proto-Mixtec tonal system. Indiana 111. 19–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan. 2001. Contact-induced tonogenesis in Southern Qiang. Language and Linguistics 2(2). 63–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan, Wen-Chi Yeh and Rukmini Kulkarni. 2018. Acoustics of tone in Indian Punjabi. Transactions of the Philological Society 116(3). 509–528. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gehrmann, Ryan. 2022. Desegmentalization: Towards a common framework for the modeling of tonogenesis and registrogenesis in Mainland Southeast Asia with case studies from Austroasiatic. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh PhD thesis.
Greenhill, Simon, Paul Heggarty, and Russell D. Gray. 2020. Bayesian phylolinguistics. In Janda, Richard, Brian D. Joseph and Barbara S. Vance (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, Vol. 21, 226–253. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guion, Susan G., Jonathan D. Amith, Christopher S. Doty and Irina A. Shport. 2010. Word-level prosody in Balsas Nahuatl: The origin, development, and acoustic correlates of tone in a stress accent language. Journal of Phonetics 38(2). 137–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haudricourt, André-Georges. 1954. De l’origine des tons en Viêtnamien. Journal Asiatique 2421. 69–82. [URL]
Howe, Penelope Jane. 2017. Tonogenesis in central dialects of Malagasy: Acoustic and perceptual evidence with implications for synchronic mechanisms of sound change. Houston: Rice University PhD thesis. [URL]
Hyman, Larry. 1976. Phonologization. In Alphonse Juilland (eds.), Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg, 407–418. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. On reconstructing tone in Proto-Niger-Congo. UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report 121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D. and Brian D. Joseph. 2003. On language, change, and language change — or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 3–180. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence. 2025. Comparative Oto-Mangean grammar research. In Wichmann, Søren (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Mexico and Northern Central America: A comprehensive guide. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kießling, Roland. 2004. Tonogenesis in Southern Cushitic (Common West Rift). In Rose-Juliet Anyanwu (eds.), Stress and tone — the African experience, 141–163. (Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter 15). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kingston, John. 2005. The phonetics of Athabaskan tonogenesis. In Hargus, Sharon & Karen Rice (eds.), Athabaskan prosody, 137–184. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 269). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo and Mikio Giriko. 2018. Tonal change and neutralization. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
L-Thongkum, Theraphan and Chommanad Intajamornrak. 2008. Tonal evolution induced by language contact: A case study of the T’in (Lua’) language of Nan Province, northern Thailand. Mon-Khmer Studies 381. 57–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
List, Johann-Mattis, Mary Walworth, Simon J. Greenhill, Tiago Tresoldi, and Robert Forkel. 2018. Sequence comparison in computational historical linguistics. Journal of Language Evolution 3(2). 130–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. 2023. Tone is not prodominant: Tone is not premordial. Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. (ICPhS 2023), 1925–1929.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manaster-Ramer, Alexis. 1986. Genesis of Hopi tones. International Journal of American Linguistics 52(2). 154–160. [URL].
Morey, Stephen. 2005. Tonal change in the Tai languages of Northeast India. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 28(2). 139–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 2015. Tonoexodus, tonogenesis, and tone change. In Honeybone, Patrick & Joseph Salmons (eds.). The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 245–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rensch, Calvin R. 1976. Comparative Otomanguean phonology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin J. Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill, and Johann-Mattis List. 2019. Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116(21). 10317–10322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Cathryn, Pittayawat Pittayaporn, James Kirby, and Sujinat Jitwiriyanont. 2022. Change and stability in the tonal contours of King Rama IX of Thailand, 1959–1997. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI) 66–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. Tone change in Mandarin: Comparing acoustic analyses from the early 20th century to today. In R. Skarnitzl & J. Volín (eds.), The 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 1930–1934.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Menghan, Shi Yan, Wuyun Pan and Li Jin. 2019. Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic. Nature 5691. 112–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue