Review published In: Diachronica
Vol. 25:3 (2008) ► pp.442–453
Book review
. Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and formal perspectives. Olga Fischer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. xviii, 378 pp.
Reviewed by
Published online: 15 December 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.25.3.09woo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.25.3.09woo
References (17)
Abraham, Werner. 1993. “Einleitung zum Thema dieses Bandes. Grammatikalisierung und Reanalyse: Einander ausschließende oder ergänzende Begriffe”? Folia Linguistica Historica 13:1/2.7–26.
Fischer, Olga. 2004a. “What counts as evidence in historical linguistics?” Studies in Language 281.710–740.
. 2004b. “Author’s response”. Studies in Language 281.745–747.
Fischer, Olga & Leek F. C. van der. 1981. “Optional vs. radical reanalysis: Mechanisms of syntactic change”. (Review of Lightfoot 1979). Lingua 551.301–50.
Gelderen, Elly van. 2004. Grammaticalization as Economy. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2002. Language Acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Kemenade, Ans van. 2000. “Structural factors in the history of English modals”. History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in the history of English modals ed. by Matti Rissanen, 287–309. Berlin: Mouton.
Legendre, Géraldine, Jane Grimshaw, & Sten Vikner, eds. 2001. Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lightfoot, David. 1974. “The diachronic analysis of English modals”. Historical Linguistics ed. by John M. Anderson & Charles Jones, 219–49. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing.
. 2004. “Abstraction and performance: Commentary on Fischer”. Studies in Language 281.741–744.
Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 2002. The Neuroscience of Language: On brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roberts, Ian & Roussou Anna. 2003. Syntactic Change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Visser, Fredericus Th. 1963–73. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. 31 Vols. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
