Article published In: Diachronica
Vol. 43:2 (2026) ► pp.159–188
Evolution of differential object marking in Macedonian dialects
Published online: 2 February 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.24047.koz
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.24047.koz
Abstract
By the late Middle Ages, a part of South Slavic, including Macedonian and Bulgarian, had lost nominal case
inflection, leading to the disappearance of the old Slavic differential object marking (DOM) system. In the 19th century, some
southern Macedonian dialects developed a new DOM system based on the preposition na ‘on, to’. This study explores
the evolution of this DOM system by comparing Southern Macedonian texts from two periods — the mid-19th century and mid-20th
century. The main factors conditioning DOM include animacy (humanness), definiteness, and the lexical class of the verb. We
observe a general increase in the na-marking and a shift from optionality toward automatization. In early texts,
the na-marking sporadically occurs with pronouns and definite human-referring nouns. In later texts, pronouns and
human proper names are almost always marked, whereas marking of definite human-referring common nouns remains optional, albeit
with increasing frequency over time. We also report negative evidence for other factors frequently mentioned in typological works
on DOM, such as the disambiguating function of case within the global discourse context. Notably, this factor does not emerge as
significant in Macedonian.
Keywords: Macedonian, differential object marking, flagging, indexing, South Slavic
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and methodology
- 3.Analysis and results
- 3.1DOF in Southern Macedonian
- 3.2Diachrony of DOM in Southern Macedonian
- 3.3Evidence from other dialects
- 4.Potential source constructions of DOF in Macedonian dialects
- 5.Conclusions
- Notes
- Abbreviations
Data References
References (58)
Asenova, Petya & Vassilka Aleksova. 2008. L’aspect
balkanique de la nota accusative personalis. Zeitschrift für
Balkanologie 44 (1). 1–22.
Bossong, Georg. 1985. Differentielle
Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen
Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.
Bužarovska, Eleni. 2001. Accusative
and dative clitics in Southern Macedonian and Northern Greek
dialects. Balkanistica 141. 1–17.
. 2020. The
contact hypothesis revised: DOM in the South Slavic periphery. Journal of Language
Contact 131. 57–95.
Bužarovska, Eleni. 2021. Informaciskata struktura i sintaksata na prostata rečenica [Information structure and word order variations]. Journal of Contemporary
Philology 4 (1). 41–58.
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic
typology: Studies in the phenomenology of
language, 329–394. Austin: University of Texas Press.
. 1989. Language
universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. 2nd
edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dalrymple, Mary & Irina Nikolaeva. 2011. Objects
and information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Durie, Mark. 1995. Towards
an understanding of linguistic evolution and the notion ‘X has a function
Y’. In Werner Abraham, Talmy Givón & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Discourse,
grammar and typology: Papers in honor of John W.M.
Verhaar, 275–308. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine. 2015. Animacy and differential
object marking in Old Church Slavonic. Russian
Linguistics 39(2). 233–254.
Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic
continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language
study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2021. Statistics for linguistics with R: A
practical introduction. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Groen, Ben M. 1977. A structural description of the
Macedonian dialect of Dihovo: Phonology, morphology, texts,
lexicon. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against
markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of
Linguistics 42(1). 25–70.
. 2021a. Explaining
grammatical coding asymmetries: Form-frequency correspondences and predictability. Journal of
Linguistics 57(3). 605–633.
. 2021b. Role-reference
associations and the explanation of argument coding
splits. Linguistics 59(1). 123–174.
Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath, & Sebastian Bank. 2025. Glottolog 5.2. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Iemmolo, Giorgio. 2010. Topicality
and differential object marking: Evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in
Language 34(2). 239–272.
. 2011. Towards
a typological study of differential object marking and differential object
indexation. Pavia: University of Pavia dissertation.
Koneski, Blaže. 1967/1986. Istorija na makedonskiot jazik [History of the Macedonian
language]. Reprinted 1986. Skopje: Kultura.
. 1986a. Makedonskiot XIX vek, jazični i kniževno-istoriski prilozi [The
Macedonian 19th century, linguistic, literary, historical
contributions]. Skopje: Kultura.
. 1986b. Direktniot na-predmet vo makedonskite govori [The direct
na-object in Macedonian dialects]. In Koneski, Blaže. Makedonskiot
XIX vek, jazični i kniževno-istoriski
prilozi, 202–205. Skopje: Kultura.
Korhonen, Jani, Maxim Makartsev, Milica Petruševska, & Ljudmil Spasov. 2016. Ethnic
and linguistic minorities in the border region of Albania, Greece, and Macedonia: An overview of legal and societal
status. In Maxim Makartsev & Max Wahlström (eds.), In
search of the center and periphery: Linguistic attitudes, minorities, and landscapes in the central
Balkans, 13–49. University of Helsinki.
Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How
to do linguistics with R. Data exploration and statistical
analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2020. Efficient
trade-offs as explanations in functional linguistics: Some problems and an alternative
proposal. Revista da
Abralin 19(3). 50–78.
Mazon, André & André Vaillant. 1938. L’Évangéliaire
de Kulakia. Un parle se slave du
Bas-Vardar. Paris: Librairie Droz.
Melis, Chantal. 1995. El
objeto directo personal en El Cantar de Mio Cid. Estudio
sintàctico-pragmàtico. In Carmen Pensado (ed.), El
complemento directo
preposicional, 133–163. Madrid: Visor Libros.
Minova-Gjurkova, Liljana. 1994. Sintaksa na makedonskiot standarden jazik [Syntax of Standard
Macedonian]. Skopje: Rading.
Mitkovska, Liljana & Eleni Bužarovska. 2023. Contrasting
a phenomenon at the syntax-discourse interface: Subject-verb inversion in English and in
Macedonian. Jezikoslovlje 24(1). 79–104.
Pensado, Carmen. 1995. La
creación del objeto directo preposicional y la flexion de los pronombres personales en las lenguas
románicas. In Carmen Pensado (ed.), El
complemento directo
preposicional, 179–233. Madrid: Visor Libros.
Penušliski, Kiril (ed.). 1985. Južnomakedonski narodni prikazni [Southern Macedonian folk tales]. V. 41. Skopje: Makedonska kniga.
Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten & Natalia Levshina. 2019. Reassessing
scale effects on differential case marking: Methodological, conceptual and theoretical issues in the quest for a
universal. In Ilja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), The
diachronic typology of differential argument
marking, 509–537. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Seržant, Ilja. 2019. Weak
universal forces: The discriminatory function of case in differential object marking
systems. In Karsten Schmidtke-Bode, Natalia Levshina, Susanne Maria Michaelis & Ilja A. Seržant (eds.), Explanation
in typology: Diachronic sources, functional motivations and the nature of the
evidence, 149–178. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Seržant, Ilja A., Sergey Say, Andreas Hölzl, Aigul Zakirova, Xinyi Gao & Andreas Pregla. 2025. A typology of positional differential argument marking. Linguistic Typology.
Siewierska, Anna & Ludmila Uhliřová. 1998. An
overview of word order in Slavic languages. In Anna Siewierska (ed.), Constituent
order in the languages of Europe, 105–150. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy
of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical
categories in Australian
languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Sinnemäki, Kaius. 2014. A
typological perspective on differential object
marking. Linguistics 52(2). 281–313.
Sobolev, Andrej. 2009. From
synthetic to analytic case: Variation in South Slavic
dialects. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), The
Oxford handbook of case, 716–730. Oxford University Press.
Strobl, Carolin, James Malley & Gerhard Tutz. 2009. An
introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees,
bagging, and random forests. Psychological
Methods 14(4). 323–348.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Harald R. Baayen. 2012. Models,
forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical
practice. Language Variation and
Change 24(2). 135–178.
Tomić, Olga M. 2008. Towards grammaticalization of
clitic doubling: Clitic doubling in Macedonian and neighbouring
languages. In Dalina Kallulli & Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), Clitic
doubling in the Balkan
languages, 65–87. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Topolińska, Zuzanna. 1995. Convergent
evolution, creolization and referentiality. In Eva Hajičová, Miroslav Červenka, Oldřich Leška & Petr Sgall (eds.), Prague
Linguistic Circle
papers, 239–247. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tošev, Krum. 1970. Nekoi inovacii vo gradskiot struški govor [Some innovations in
the urban speech of
Struga]. Prilozi 1(1). 105–113.
Vidoeski, Božidar. 1989. Govorot na seloto Nestram (Kostursko) [The dialect of the
Nestram
village]. Prilozi 14(2). 47–78.
. 1998. Dijalektite na makedonskiot jazik [The dialects of the Macedonian
language]. Tom 11. Skopje: Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite.
von Heusinger, Klaus. 2008. Verbal
semantics and the diachronic development of DOM in
Spanish. Probus 201. 1–31.
. 2018. The
diachronic development of Differential Object Marking in Spanish ditransitive
constructions. In Ilja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Diachrony
of differential argument
marking, 315–344 Berlin: Language Science Press.
von Heusinger, Klaus & Georg A. Kaiser. 2007. Differential
object marking and the lexical semantics of verbs in Spanish. In Georg A. Kaiser & Manuel Leonetti (eds.), Proceedings
of the Workshop “Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance
Languages”, 85–110. Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Konstanz.
Wahlström, Max. 2015. Loss
of case inflection in Bulgarian and Macedonian. PhD
dissertation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
