Cover not available

Editorial published In: Diachronica
Vol. 40:5 (2023) ► pp.666–682

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
Editorial

Diachrony and Diachronica

40@40

ORCiD logo with link | Yale University


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 7 March 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.24014.bow
Article outline
  • Diachronica at 40
  • Forty years of diachronic generative syntax
  • Bad data, parsed corpora, and an underexplored natural alliance in the study of diachronic syntax
  • Experimental linguistics and language change
  • A few comments on the use of the time variable in historical corpus studies
  • The Life-Cycle Model of phonological change
  • Pertinacity in phonological change
  • References
References (12)
References
Butt, Miriam & Aditi Lahiri. 2013. Diachronic pertinancy of light verbs. Lingua 1351, 7–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan & Aditi Lahiri. 2005. Main Stress Left in Early Middle English. In M. Fortescue, E. S. Jensen, J. E. Mogensen, & L. Schøsler (eds.) Historical Linguistics 2003: Selected Papers from the 16th International Congress of Historical Linguistics, Copenhagen 11–15 August, 74–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick & Joseph Salmons. 2015. The Oxford handbook of historical phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennard, Holly & Aditi Lahiri. 2020. Nonesuch phonemes in loanwords. Linguistics 581, 83–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward. 1994. Creating anaphors: An historical study of the English reflexive pronouns. Ms., University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Explaining the creation of reflexive pronouns in English. In D. Minkova & R. Stockwell (eds.) Studies in the history of the English language: A millennial perspective 325–354. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2015. Phonologization. In P. Honeybone & J. Salmons (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology, 563–582. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi & Holly Kennard. 2019. Pertinacity in loanwords: Same underlying systems, different outputs. In M. Cennamo (ed.) Historical Linguistics 2015: Selected Papers from the 22nd International Congress of Historical Linguistics, Naples 27–31 July, 58–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001. Formal syntax, diachronic Minimalism, and etymology: The history of French chez. Linguistic Inquiry 321, 275–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plank, Frans & Aditi Lahiri. 2015. Macrosopic and microscopic typology: Basic Valance Orientation, more pertinacious than meets the naked eye. Linguistic Typology 191, 1–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 2015. Time for change. In Carlotta Viti (ed.), Perspectives on Historical Syntax, §1.4. 61–91. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walkden, George. 2012. Against inertia, Lingua. 122(8), 891–901, .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue