Cover not available

Review published In: Diachronica
Vol. 23:2 (2006) ► pp.426–433

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Yaron Matras & Peter Bakker. The Mixed Language Debate: Theoretical and empirical advances. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003. vi, 325 pp.

Reviewed by
 | Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
Published online: 15 December 2006
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23.2.11gra
References (19)
References
Bakker, Peter. 2002. “An early vocabulary of British Romani (1619): A linguistic analysis”. Romani Studies, Fifth Series, 12:2.75–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2000. “Chamorro historical phonology”. Oceanic Linguistics 391.83–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borrow, George. 1841. The Zincali. London: John Murray.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costenoble, H. 1940. Die Chamoro-Sprache. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow, Es-sex: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Embleton, Sheila M. 1986. Statistics in Historical Linguistics. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golovko, Evgeni V. & Vakhtin Nikolai B.. 1990. “Aleut in contact: The CIA enigma.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 221.97–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grant, Anthony P. 2002. “Fabric, pattern, shift and diffusion: What changes in Oregon Penutian languages can tell historical linguistics.” Proceedings of the Meeting of the Hokan-Penutian Workshop June 17–18, 2000, University of California at Berkeley, edited by Laura Buszard-Welcher, 33–56. Berkeley: Survey of California and Other Indian Languages.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grant, Anthony. 2003. Review of Ruth King, The lexical basis of grammatical borrowing: a Prince Edward Island case study (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2000). Word 54:3.251–256.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1984. “Language contact and language change”. Annual Review of Anthropology 1984.367–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johansson, Roger. 1977. Svensk rommani/ upptecknad av Roger Johansson; med etymologiska och grammatiska kommentarer av Gösta Bergman och Erik Ljungberg samt förord av Adam Heymowski (= Acta Academiae Regiae Gustavi Adolphi , 551). Uppsala: Gustav Adolfs Akademi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia. 1994. A Grammar of Berbice Dutch Creole. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Page, Robert B. & Andrée Tabouret-Keller. 1985. Acts of Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerch, Hans-Günter. 1976. Das Manische in Giessen. Giessen: Anabas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macalister, Robert A. S. 1914. The Language of the Nawar or Zutt, the Nomad Gypsy Smiths of Palestine. London & Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miskow, Johan & Viggo Brøndal. 1923. “Sigøjnersprog i Danmark”. Danske Studier 97–143.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mous, Maarten. 2003. The Making of a Mixed Language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robertson, Ian E. 1994. “Berbiciaansche woorde.” Amsterdam Creole Studies 111.67–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 1996. “Contact-induced change and the comparative method: cases from Papua New Guinea”. The Comparative Method Reviewed: Irregularity and regularity in linguistic change, ed. by Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross, 180–217. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue