Review published In: Diachronica
Vol. 21:1 (2004) ► pp.208–213
Book review
. Comparative Historical Dialectology: Italo-Romance clues to Ibero-Romance sound change. Thomas D. Cravens. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002. xi, 163 pp.
Reviewed by
Published online: 30 July 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.21.1.11dwo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.21.1.11dwo
References (10)
Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo. 2001. Review of Essays in Hispanic Linguistics Dedicated to Paul M. Lloyd
ed. by Robert J. Blake, Diana L. Ranson & Roger Wright. Newark, Del.: Juan de la Cuesta. Romance Philology 541.499–505.
Craddock, Jerry R. 1969. Latin Legacy Versus Substratum Residue: The unstressed “derivational” suffixes in the Romance vernaculars of the western Mediterranean.(=
University of California Publications in Linguistics
, 531.) Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Cravens, Thomas D. 2000. “Romance Lenition”. New Approaches to Old Problems: Issues in Romance historical linguistics ed. by Steven N. Dworkin & Dieter Wanner, 47–64. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Figge, Udo. 1966.
Die romanische Anlaut Sonorisation
. (=
Romanistische Versuche und Vorarbeiten
, 191.) Bonn: Romanisches Seminar der Universität Bonn.
Loporcaro, Michele. 1997. L’origine del raddoppiamento fonosintattico: Saggio di fonologia diacronica romanza. (=
Romanica Helvetica
, 1151.) Basle & Tübingen: Francke.
. 2003. “Due note sul raddoppiamento fonosintattico: 1. L’iberoromanzo in fase antica, 2. Fiorent. tu
”. Romance Philology 561.307–318.
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón. 1954. “A propósito de l y ll latinas: Colonización suditálica en España”. Boletín de la Real Academia Española 341.165–216.
