Article published In: Diachronica
Vol. 20:1 (2003) ► pp.83–137
Philological evidence for *e and *o in Pre-Old Japanese
Published online: 14 August 2003
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20.1.06miy
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20.1.06miy
Many Japanese historical linguists reconstruct a four-vowel system without *e and *o for Proto-Japonic (PJ), the ancestor of the Japanese and Ryukyuan languages. However, a few (Unger 1993 [1977], Hattori 1978–79, Thorpe 1983, Serafim 1999a, 1999b) have reconstructed PJ *e and *o. Until now, arguments for PJ *e and *o have been based on (a) Japonic internal and comparative reconstructions and (b) Japonic languages attested from the eighth century onward. In this paper I test the PJ *e and *o hypothesis using two other types of evidence: pre-eighth century transcriptions and Sino-Japanese readings borrowed prior to the eighth century.
Keywords: Chinese, Old Japanese, Ryukyuan, Japonic, transcription, vowels, vowel raising, historical phonology
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Xu, Ye & In-han Kwon
Jarosz, Aleksandra, Martine Robbeets, Ricardo Fernandes, Hiroto Takamiya, Akito Shinzato, Naoko Nakamura, Maria Shinoto & Mark Hudson
Elmer, Patrick
Pellard, Thomas
2010. Review of Bentley (2008): A Linguistic History of the Forgotten Islands: A Reconstruction of the proto-language of the Southern Ryukyus. Diachronica 27:1 ► pp. 170 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
