Cover not available

Review published In: Diachronica
Vol. 2:2 (1985) ► pp.231–237

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Frederick B. Agard. A Course in Romance Linguistics. A Diachronic view. Frederick B. Agard. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ. Press, 1984. XV, 259 pp.

Reviewed by
 | University of Georgia
Published online: 1 January 1985
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.2.2.08gor
References (17)
References
Agard, Frederick B. 1983. A Course in Romance Linguistics. Vol.11: The Synchronic View. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, J. D. H., Jr. 1941. Portuguese Word-Formation with Suffixes. (= Language Dissertation, 331.) Baltimore, Md.: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dworkin, Steven N. 1974. Studies in the History of Latin Primary -D-in Hispano-Romance. Ph.D. diss., Univ. of California, Berkeley. (Cf. also Dworkin’s paper on the subject in Forurn Linguisticum 31.47–56.)
Fleischmann, Suzanne. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Dia-chronic evidence from Romance. (= Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 361.) Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A., Jr. 1974. External History of the Romance Languages. (= Comparative Romance Grammar, 11.) New York-Amsterdam-London: Else-vier. (2nd printing, 1977.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. Proto-Romance Phonology. (= Comparative Romance Grammar, 21.) Ibid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. Proto-Romance Morphology. (= Comparative Romance Grammar, 31 = Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 301.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karlsson, Keith E. 1981. Syntax and Affixation: The evolution of MENTE in Latin and Romance. (= Beihefte zur “Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie”, 1821.) Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leonard, Clifford S., Jr. 1960. A Reconstruction of Proto-Rhaeto-Romance and its Implications for the History of French. Unpubl. Ph.D. diss., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1969. “A Reconstruction of Proto-Lucian”. Orbis 181.439–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov. 1942. Review of Allen (1941). Lg 181.51–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzola, Michael. 1976. Proto-Romance and Sicilian. Lisse: P. de Ridder.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm. 1935. Romanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 3rd ed. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. [= REW]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1954. Die lexikalische Differenzierung der romani-schen Sprachen. Bern & München: A. Francke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliavini, Carlo. 1949. Le Origini delie lingue neolatini. Bologna: R. Patron. (6th ed., 1972.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tobler, Adolf. 1912ff. Altfranzösisches Wörterbuch. Adolf Toblers nach-gelassene Materialien bearbeitet und mit Unterstützung der Preussi-schen Akademie der Wissenschaften hrgg. von Erhard Lommatzsch. Berlin, later on Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wartburg, Walther von. 1922–1962. Franzbsisches etymologisches Wörter-Bonn: Klopp, later on Basel: Zbinden. [= FEW]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue