Review published In: Diachronica
Vol. 18:1 (2001) ► pp.171–180
Book review
. Lexical phonology and the history of English. April McMahon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 309 pp.
Reviewed by
Published online: 25 March 2002
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18.1.13gol
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18.1.13gol
References (13)
Agutter, Alex. 1988a. “The dangers of dialect parochialism: The Scottish Vowel Length Rule”. Historical Dialectology ed. by Jacek Fisiak, 1–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 1988b. “The not-so-Scottish Vowel Length Rule”. Edinburgh Studies in the English Language ed. by John M. Anderson & Norman Macleod, 120–132. Edinburgh: John Donald.
Booij, Geert & Rubach Jerzy. 1987. “Postcyclic versus postlexical rules in Lexical Phonology”. Linguistic Inquiry 181.1–44.
Halle, Morris & Mohanan K. P.. 1985. “Segmental phonology of modern English”. Linguistic Inquiry 161.57–116.
Iverson, Gregory K. & Salmons Joseph C.. 1995. “Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic”. Phonology 121.369–396.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. “How abstract is phonology?”. Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory ed. by O. Fujimura, 1–136. Tokyo: Taikusha.
. 1982. “Lexical phonology and morphology”. Linguistics in the Morning Calm ed. by I.-S. Yang, 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.
