Marta Harasowska. Morphophonemic variability, productivity, and change: The case of rusyn. Marta Harasowska. [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, 110]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999. xvi, 266 pp.

Reviewed by

David Fertig | University at Buffalo, SUNY

Published online: 25 March 2002

https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18.1.10fer

References (6)

References

Baker, William J. & Derwing Bruce L.. 1982. “Response Coincidence Analysis as Evidence for Language Acquisition Strategies”. Applied Psycholinguistics 31.193–221.

Bybee, Joan. 1994. “Morphological Universals and Change”. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics ed. by R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson, vol. 51, 2557–2562. New York: Pergamon.

Comrie, Bernard. 1979. “Morphophonemic Exceptions and Phonetic Distance”. Linguistics 171.51–60.

Fertig, David. 2000. Morphological Change Up Close. (= Linguistische Arbeiten , 4221.) Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Linell, Per. 1979. Psychological Reality in Phonology: A Theoretical Study. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tiersma, Peter Meijes. 1982. “Local and General Markedness”. Language 581.832–849.

Marta Harasowska. Morphophonemic variability, productivity, and change: The case of rusyn. Marta Harasowska. [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, 110]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999. xvi, 266 pp.

Marta Harasowska. Morphophonemic variability, productivity, and change: The case of rusyn. Marta Harasowska. [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, 110]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999. xvi, 266 pp.