Cover not available

Article published In: Diachronica
Vol. 36:1 (2019) ► pp.6699

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (40)
References
Arndt-Lappe, Sabine & Ingo Plag (eds.). 2015. Special issue: Semantics of derivational morphology. Morphology 25(4). 349–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, Harald & Rochelle Lieber. 1991. Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics 29(5). 801–843. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber & Ingo Plag. 2013. The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coetsem, Frans van. 1995. Outlining a model of the transmission phenomenon in language contact. Leuvense Bijdragen 841. 63–85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dictionnaire du Moyen Français. [URL]. (6 April, 2016.)
Douglas, David (ed.). 1975. English historical documents, vol 31. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fisiak, Jacek. 1970. The semantics of English loanwords in Polish. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 21. 41–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco. Forthcoming. Morphology and contact-induced language change. In Anthony Grant (ed.), The Oxford handbook of language contact. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gardani, Francesco, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze. 2015. Borrowed morphology: An overview. In Francesco Gardani, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze (eds.), Borrowed morphology, 1–23. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gramley, Stephan. 2012. The history of English: An introduction. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2011. Typological changes in the lexicon. Analytic tendencies in English noun formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 2003. Causes and consequences of word structure. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ingham, Richard. 2018. Medieval bilingualism in England: On the rarity of vernacular code-switching. In Päivi Pahta, Janna Skaffari & Laura Wright (eds.), Multilingual practices in language history, 319–337. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kawaletz, Lea & Ingo Plag. 2015. Predicting the semantics of English nominalizations: A frame-based analysis of -ment suffixation. In Laurie Bauer, Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), Semantics of complex words, 289–319. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne. 2003. Polysemy in derivational affixes. In Brigitte Nerlich, Zazie Todd, Vimala Herman & David D. Clarke (eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language, 217–232. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Semantics of derivational morphology. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics, 2098–2119. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2007. The borrowability of structural categories. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 31–73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL]. (12 Dec, 2013.)
Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological productivity. Structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Productivity. In Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 537–556. Malden: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sakel, Jeanette. 2007. Types of loan: matter and pattern. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 15–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schröder, Anne. 2011. On the productivity of verbal prefixation in English: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulte, Marion. 2015a. The semantics of derivational morphology: A synchronic and diachronic investigation of the suffixes -age and -ery in English. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. Polysemy and synonymy in derivational affixation – A case study of the English suffixes -age and -ery . Morphology 25(4). 371–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Language contact in the history of English. In Marcus Hartner & Marion Schulte (eds.), Migration in context: literature, culture and language, 21–36. Bielefeld: Aisthesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Investigating semantic change in derivational morphology. In Elise Louviot & Catherine Delesse (eds.), Studies in language variation and change 2: Shifts and turns in the history of English, 41–60. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank. 2013. AfBo: A world-wide survey of affix borrowing. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (11 July, 2018.)
. 2015. Direct and indirect affix borrowing. Language 91(3). 511–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2008. Language contact. Constraints and common paths of contact-induced language change. In Peter Siemund & Noemi Kintana (eds.), Language contact and contact languages, 3–11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trips, Carola. 2009. Lexical semantics and diachronic morphology. The development of -hood, dom, and -ship in the history of English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uth, Melanie. 2011. Französische Ereignisnominalisierungen. Abstrakte Bedeutung und regelhafte Wortbildung. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanhove, Martine, Thomas Stolz, Aina Urdze & Hitomi Otsuka (eds.). 2012. Morphologies in contact. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2003. An introduction to contact linguistics. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wohlgemuth, Jan. 2009. A typology of verbal borrowings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, Laura. 2018. A multilingual approach to the history of Standard English. In Päivi Pahta, Janna Skaffari & Laura Wright (eds.), Multilingual practices in language history, 339–358. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Chen, Tingting, Lixia Du & Naeem Jan
2022. English Semantic Analysis Algorithm and Application Based on Improved Attention Mechanism Model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2022  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue