In:Reading and Writing Public Documents
Edited by Daniël Janssen and Rob Neutelings
[Document Design Companion Series 1] 2001
► pp. 147–169
8. Convincing citizens
The role of argument quality
Published online: 23 February 2001
https://doi.org/10.1075/ddcs.1.08hoe
https://doi.org/10.1075/ddcs.1.08hoe
In a democracy, public acceptance of proposed policies is an important determinant of a successful government. Communication plays an important role in ascertaining public acceptance. The government has to convince the public that the proposed policy in the interest of the individual citizen or of society as a whole. To attain this goal, the government is expected to use proper arguments instead of taking its refuge to manipulation. Therefore, the quality of the arguments used is important. Argument quality is determined by two aspects: (1) argument strength, i.e., the belief in the probability that a consequence will arise, and (2) argument valence, i.e., the perceived desirability of the consequence. In order to convince the public of a policy’s desirability, the government has to convince the public that the policy will probably have desirable effects. This paper presents empirical research on how to attain this goal.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Hornikx, Jos
Rendon, Hector, Alyson Wilson & Jared Stegall
Renkema, Jan & Christoph Schubert
Freelon, Deen
Hoeken, Hans & Lettica Hustinx
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
