Article published In: The Pragmatics of Crisis
Edited by Geert Jacobs and Luuk Van Waes
[Document Design 2:3] 2001
► pp. 236–246
Current views on risk communication and their implications for crisis and reputation management
Published online: 2 November 2001
https://doi.org/10.1075/dd.2.3.04gut
https://doi.org/10.1075/dd.2.3.04gut
Organizations prepare for crisis communication by designing, implementing, and evaluating procedures, scenarios, and emergency measures. In addition to crisis communication, risk communication is a concern for many organizations as well. Risk communication is viewed as an interactive, multi-actor democratic process. Traditionally, risk communication is seen as a linear, top-down, elitist, expert-to-public approach. In this paper, the relation between crisis communication and risk communication is described. In addition, a model is presented based on the notion that crisis communication should be proactive, and focusing on the management of the relation between the organization and its relevant stakeholders or the organization’s reputation. The new thinking on the risk communication process is essential for an organization’s crisis and reputation management.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Grunwald, Guido & Bernd Hempelmann
Standop, Dirk & Guido Grunwald
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
