In:Conspiracy Theory Discourses
Edited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 98] 2022
► pp. 489–494
EpilogueBeyond discourse theory in the conspiratorial mode?
The critical issue of truth in the age of post-truth
Published online: 1 December 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98.21ang
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98.21ang
References (11)
Angermuller, Johannes. 2015. Why There Is No Poststructuralism in France. The Making of an Intellectual Generation. London: Bloomsbury.
. 2018. “Truth after Post-truth: for a Strong Programme in Discourse Studies.” Palgrave Communications 4 (30): 1–8.
Cleen, Benjamin De, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2017. “Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism.” Javnost – The Public. Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture 24 (4): 301–319.
Fairclough, Norman. 1993. “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: the Universities.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 133–168.
Foucault, Michel. 1997. “Il faut défendre la société.” Cours au collège de France. 1976. Paris: Gallimard, Seuil.
Jameson, Fredric. 1991. Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Pêcheux, Michel. 1975. Les Vérités de La Palice. Paris: Maspero, trad. Language, Semantics and Ideology. Stating the Obvious. London: Macmillan, 1982.
Pluckrose, Helen. 2017. “How French ‘Intellectuals’ Ruined the West: Postmodernism and Its Impact, Explained.” In [URL]
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Deschrijver, Cedric
2024. News media’s epistemological framings of the Covid-19 ‘lab leak’ hypothesis. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 215 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.