In:Conspiracy Theory Discourses
Edited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 98] 2022
► pp. 421–442
Chapter 18“These cameras won’t show the crowds”
Intradiscursive intertextuality in Trumpian discourse’s crowd size conspiracy theory
Published online: 1 December 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98.18cam
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98.18cam
Abstract
This chapter uses a linguistically-based critical discourse analytic framework to identify, isolate, and contextualize the discursive strategies involved in the construction of conspiracy theories in former US President Donald Trump’s campaign-style rally speeches. Unlike simple falsehoods, conspiracy theories are discursively constructed, repeated, and must involve (specific or vague) accusations about certain agents acting against another party surreptitiously. This chapter analyzes the discursive strategies Trump uses to construct the “crowd size” conspiracy theory: the oft-repeated claim in Trumpian discourse that Trump’s opponents (especially the media) routinely manipulate, mask, and underestimate the number of Trump’s supporters who come to see him at events. Five discursive strategies are identified: the iconization of stock phrases, the repetition of numbers, insults, intertextuality, and recursivity. I also demonstrate how the application of these strategies is necessarily intradiscursively intertextual, i.e., characterized by repetition and reference across both speech genre (campaign rallies) and discursive context (Trumpian discourse) more broadly.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Related work
- 3.Key terminology
- 4.Methodology
- 5.Discursive strategies
- 5.1Stock phrases
- 5.2Numbers
- 5.3Insults
- 5.4Intertextuality
- 5.5Recursivity
- 6.Conclusion
- Transcription notations
Notes References
References (33)
Agha, Asif. 2005. “Voice, Footing, Enregisterment.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (1): 38–59.
Bolonyai, Agnes, and Kelsey Campolong. 2017. “‘We Mustn’t Fool Ourselves’: ‘Orbánian’ Discourse in the Political Battle over the Refugee Crisis and European Identity.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5 (2): 251–273.
Boukala, Salomi. 2014. “Waiting for Democracy: Political Crisis and the Discursive (Re)Invention of the ‘National Enemy’ in Times of ‘Grecovery.’” Discourse & Society 25 (4): 483–499.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Translated by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Campolong, Kelsey. Forthcoming. “Donald Trump’s Construction of Truth: A Linguistically-Based Critical Discourse Analysis.” PhD diss. Ulster University.
Dance, William. n.d. “FakeBelieve – The Disinformation and Fake News Blog.” Accessed Jan. 11, 2021. [URL]
d’Ancona, Matthew. 2017. Post-Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London: Ebury Press.
Demata, Massimiliano. 2017. “‘A Great and Beautiful Wall’: Donald Trump’s Populist Discourse on Immigration.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5 (2): 274–294.
Demata, Massimiliano, Michelangelo Conoscenti, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2020. “Riding the Populist Wave: Metaphors of Populism and Anti-Populism in The Daily Mail and The Guardian.” Iperstoria 15: 8–35.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. “Intertextuality in Critical Discourse Analysis.” Linguistics and Education 4 (3): 269–293.
Goldstein, Donna M., Kira Hall, and Matthew Bruce Ingram. 2020. “Trump’s Comedic Gestures as Political Weapon.” In Language in the Trump Era: Scandals and Emergencies, ed. by Janet McIntosh and Norman Mendoza-Denton, 97–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hansson, Sten, and Sandra Kröger. 2021. “How a Lack of Truthfulness Can Undermine Democratic Representation: The Case of Post-Referendum Brexit Discourses.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 23 (4): 609–626.
Heffer, Chris. 2020. All Bullshit and Lies? Insincerity, Irresponsibility, and the Judgement of Untruthfulness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Irvine, Judith T., and Susan Gal. 2000. “Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation.” In Regimes of Language, ed. by Paul V. Kroskrity, 35–83. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
Jäger, Siegfried, and Florentine Maier. 2016. “Analysing Discourses and Dispositives: A Foucauldian Approach to Theory and Methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, Third Edition, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 109–136. London: SAGE.
Knoblock, Natalia. 2020. “Negotiating Dominance on Facebook: Positioning of Self and Others in Pro- and Anti-Trump Comments on Immigration.” Discourse & Society 31 (5), 520–539.
Koller, Veronika, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer (eds.). 2019. Discourses of Brexit. London: Routledge.
McIntosh, Janet, and Norma Mendoza-Denton. 2020. Language in the Trump Era: Scandals and Emergencies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2016. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, Third Edition, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 23–61. London: SAGE.
Sclafani, Jennifer. 2017. Talking Donald Trump: A Sociolinguistic Study of Style, Metadiscourse, and Political Identity. New York: Routledge.
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112.
. 2016. “Discourse as the Recontextualization of Social Practice – A Guide.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, Third Edition, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 137–153. London: SAGE.
Wodak, Ruth. 2011. “‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Inclusion and Exclusion – Discrimination via Discourse.” In Identity, Belonging and Migration, ed. by Gerard Delanty, Ruth Wodak, and Paul Jones, 54–77. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.