Cover not available

In:Conspiracy Theory Discourses
Edited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 98] 2022
► pp. 343–364

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 15
Ideologies and the representation of identities in anti-vaccination conspiracy theories

A critical discourse analysis of the MMR vaccine-autism debate

ORCiD logo with link | University of Brescia
Published online: 1 December 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98.15fia
Abstract
The present chapter analyses a corpus of newspaper articles published in national UK broadsheets and tabloids dealing with the controversy surrounding the safety of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. By adopting a corpus-assisted critical discourse studies approach, the chapter seeks to highlight how writers variably use language to legitimise or delegitimise their own, as well as their opponents’, claims and identities. The results show that there has been an increasing tendency in recent years among writers in the traditional, mainstream press to oppose anti-vaccination conspiracy theories by identifying and criticising “typical” anti-vaccinators conspiracy theorists, thus undermining their identities rather than their claims. However, these strategies risk to backfire if they push believers in anti-vaccination conspiracy theories towards online, fringe environments like internet fora and social media.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1CDA and the study of ideology and identity
    • 1.2Anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and the MMR vaccine
  • 2.The corpus
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Discourses of and about anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and theorists
    • 3.2Framing and defining anti-vaccination conspiracy theorists
    • 3.3Conspiracy theorists and anti-vaxxers
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
  • Dictionary entries
References (46)
References
Anthony, Lawrence. 2021. AntConc (Version 4.0.2) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Baker, Paul. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stieg Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Block, David. 2012. “Economising globalisation and identity in applied linguistics in neoliberal times.” Neoliberalism and applied linguistics, 56–85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyce, Tammy. 2007. Health, Risk and News: The MMR Vaccine and the Media. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boykoff, Maxwell T., and Jules M. Boykoff. 2004. “Balance as Bias: Global Warming and the US Prestige Press.” Global Environmental Change 14 (2): 125–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen R. 1994. “On Reporting Reporting: The Representation of Speech in Factual and Factional Narratives.” In Coulthard, Malcolm, and Louisa Semlyen (eds.). Advances In Written Text Analysis. London and New York: Routledge: 295–308.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen, and Rick Iedema (eds). 2016. Identity Trouble: Critical Discourse and Contested Identities. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clarke, Christopher E. 2008. “A Question of Balance: The Autism-Vaccine Controversy in the British and American Elite Press.” Science Communication 30 (1): 77–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Fina, Anna. 2006. “Discourse and Identity”. In Discourse and Identity, ed. by Anna de Fina, Deborah Schiffrin and Michael Bamberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 263–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deer, Brian. 2004. “Revealed: MMR research scandal.” The Sunday Times, 22 February 2004.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “The Truth of the MMR vaccine scandal.” The Sunday Times, 24 January 2010.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. The Doctor Who Fooled the World: Science, Deception, and the War on Vaccines. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Douglas, Karen M., Robbie M. Sutton, and Aleksandra Cichocka. 2017. “The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 26 (6): 538–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durbach, Nadja. 2005. Bodily Matters: The Anti-Vaccination Movement in England, 1853–1907. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Analysing Discourse. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Michael. 2004. MMR and Autism: What Parents Need to Know. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul. 1990. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. London and New York: Falmer Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodge, Bob. 2012. “Ideology, Identity, Interaction: Contradictions and Challenges for Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 5 (2): 1–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornsey, Matthew J., Matthew Finlayson, Gabrielle Chatwood, and Christopher T. Begeny. 2020. “Donald Trump and Vaccination: The Effect of Political Identity, Conspiracist Ideation and Presidential Tweets on Vaccine Hesitancy.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 88: 103947. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kata, Anna. 2009. “A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet.” Vaccine 28: 1709–1716. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Anti-Vaccine Activists, Web 2.0, and the Postmodern Paradigm – An Overview of Tactics and Tropes Used Online by the Anti-vaccination Movement.” Vaccine 30: 3778–3789. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Machin, David and Andrea Mayr. 2012. How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mnookin, Seth. 2012. The Panic Virus: The True Story Behind the Vaccine-Autism Controversy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Numerato, Dino, Lenka Vochocová, Václav Štětka, and Alena Macková. 2019. “The Vaccination Debate in the “Post-Truth” Era: Social Media as Sites of Multi-Layered Reflexivity.” Sociology of Health and Illness 41 (1): 82–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Offit, Paul A. 2011. Deadly Choices: How the Anti-Vaccine Movement Threatens Us All. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plastina, Anna Maria, and Rosita Maglie. 2019. “Vague Language in the MMR Vaccine Controversy: A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of Its Functional Use.” Lingue e Linguaggi 29: 93–119.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, John E. 2007. Analysing Newspapers. London: Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stein, Richard A. 2017. “The golden age of anti-vaccine conspiracies.” GERMS 7 (4): 168–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stöckl, Andrea, and Anna Smajdor. 2017. “The MMR Debate in the United Kingdom: Vaccine Scares, Statemanship and the Media.” In The Politics of Vaccination: A Global History, ed. by Christine Holomberg, Stuart Blume, and Paul Greenough, 235–259. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., and Adrian Vermeule. 2009. “Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17: 202–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1991. Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo A. 1996. Text and Practice. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Retracted: Wakefield, Andrew J., Simon H. Murch, Andrew Anthony, John C. Linnell, D. M. Casson, Mohsin Malik, Mark Berelowitz, Amar P. Dhillon, Mike A. Thomson, Peter Harvey, Alan R. Valentine, Susan E. Davies, and John A. Walker-Smith. 1998. “Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children.” The Lancet. 351 (9103): 637–641. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G. 1995. “Discourse Analysis: A Critical View.” Language and Literature 4 (3): 157–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. “The Theory and Practice of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Applied Linguistics 19 (1): 136–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas. 2018. “Populist knowledge: “Post-truth” repertoires of contesting epistemic authorities.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 5 (4): 356–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Richard K., Robert M. Wolfe, Dwight E. Fox, Jake R. Fox, Mary Patricia Nowalk, Judith A. Troy, and Lisa K. Sharp. 2005. “Vaccine Criticism on the World Wide Web.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 7 (2): e17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zotzmann, Karin, and John P. O’Regan. 2016. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Identity.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity, ed. by Siân Preece, 139–154. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dictionary entries
“post-truth, adj.”. OED Online. December 2020. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Luu, Vinh Trinh & J. Patrick Williams
2025. How K-pop Fans Utilize Conventional and Subcultural Frameworks to Construct Fan Identities: A Case Study of Seungri and the Burning Sun Scandal. Deviant Behavior 46:4 ► pp. 513 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue