In:Conspiracy Theory Discourses
Edited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 98] 2022
► pp. 143–168
Chapter 7Exploring the echo chamber concept
A linguistic perspective
Published online: 1 December 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98.07bon
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98.07bon
Abstract
Echo chambers have often been analyzed in social media studies as dysfunctions of communication fostering the polarization of debates and the spreading of conspiracy theories. On the other hand, from a linguistic perspective, very little research has been conducted on these themes. Our work aims to investigate the linguistic dimension of echo chambers, exploring them as ideological structures that are observable when ideological conflict occurs. Using word embedding and corpus-based discourse analysis, we investigate mediatic discourse on COVID-19 in the Coronavirus Corpus and in the Public Coronavirus Twitter Data Set. The analysis focuses on the semantic and pragmatic status of the word hoax, which emerges as a keyword characterizing the Twitter dataset. Our study shows how linguistic markers of ideological conflict can act as markers of position and affective/social identity.
Keywords: echo chambers, Twitter, corpus linguistics, word embedding, COVID-19, hoax
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background: Echo chambers
- 3.Methods
- 4.Corpus analysis: Preliminary overview
- 5.Focus on hoax: Background
- 6.Analyzing hoax in the News
- 7.Hoax on Twitter
- 8.Inside the inferential path: The embeddings
- 9.Conclusions
Notes References
References (70)
Aupers, Stef, Dana Crăciun, and Andreas Őnnerfors. 2020. “Introduction”. In Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories, ed by Michael Butter and Peter Knight, 387–390. London, New York: Routledge.
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michal Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19: 273–306.
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, and Tony McEnery. 2013. Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bastos, Marco. 2021. “From Global Village to Identity Tribes: Context Collapse and the Darkest Timeline.” Media and Communication 9 (3): 16–24.
Breeze, Ruth. 2020. “Exploring Populist Styles of Political Discourse in Twitter.” World Englishes 39 (4): 550–567.
Bruns, Axel. 2019. “It’s not the Technology, Stupid: How the ‘Echo Chamber’ and ‘Filter Bubble’ Metaphors have Failed us.” International Association for Media and Communication Research Conference 2019.
Burgers, Christian, Melanie Jong Tjien Fa, and Anneke de Graaf. 2019. “A Tale of two Swamps: Transformations of a Metaphorical Frame in Online Partisan Media.” Journal of Pragmatics 141: 57–66.
Calderón, Fernando H., Li-Kai Cheng, Ming-Jen Lin, Yen-Hao Huang, and Yi-Shin Chen. 2019. “Content-based Echo Chamber Detection on Social Media Platforms.” In 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 597–600. IEEE.
Chen, Emily, Kristina Lerman, and Emilio Ferrara. 2020. “Tracking Social Media Discourse about the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development of a Public Coronavirus Twitter Dataset.” JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 6.2: e19273.
Cinelli, Matteo, Emanuele Brugnoli, Ana Lucia Schmidt, Fabiana Zollo, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Scala Antonio. 2020. “Selective Exposure Shapes the Facebook News Diet.” PLoS ONE 15 (3): e0229129.
Cinelli, Matteo, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Alessandro Galeazzi, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Michele Starnini. 2021a. “The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (9). e2023301118
Cinelli, Matteo, Andraž Pelicon, Igor Mozetič, Walter Quattrociocchi, Petra Kralj Novak, and Fabiana Zollo. 2021b. “Dynamics of Online Hate and Misinformation.” Scientific Reports 11 (1): 22083, 1–12.
Conover, Michael, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew Francisco, Bruno Gonçalves, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2011. “Political Polarization on Twitter.” In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 5, no. 1.
Cota, Wesley, Silvio C. Ferreira, Romualdo Pastor-Satorras, and Michele Starnini. 2019. “Quantifying Echo Chamber Effects in Information Spreading over Political Communication Networks.” EPJ Data Science 8 (1): 1–13.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2017. The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Davies, Mark. 2016. Corpus of News on the Web (NOW). Available online at [URL]
. 2019. The Coronavirus Corpus. Available online at [URL]
Del Vicario, Michela, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Fabio Petroni, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, Eugene, Stanley H., and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2016a. “The spreading of misinformation online.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (3): 554–559.
Del Vicario Michela, Vivaldo, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo Fabiana, Antonio Scala Antonio, Guido Caldarelli Guido, Walter Quattrociocchi Walter. 2016b. “Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook.” Scientific Reports. 6: 37825.
Dubois, Elizabeth, and Grant Blank. 2018. “The Echo Chamber is Overstated: The Moderating Effect of Political Interest and Diverse Media.” Information, Communication & Society 21 (5): 729–745.
Duseja, Nikita, and Harsh Jhamtani. 2019. “A Sociolinguistic Study of Online Echo Chambers on Twitter.” In Proceedings of the third workshop on natural language processing and computational social science, 78–83.
Edwards, Arthur. 2013. “(How) do Participants in Online Discussion Forums Create ‘Echo Chambers’?: The Inclusion and Exclusion of Dissenting Voices in an Online Forum about Climate Change.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1): 127–150.
Fairclough, Norman. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Routledge.
Fernandez, Miriam, and Harith Alani. 2018. “Online Misinformation: Challenges and Future Directions.” In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018, WWW ’18, International World Wide Web Conferences, Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 595–602.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1976. “Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 280 (1): 20–32.
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2018. “Keyness Analysis: Nature, Metrics and Techniques.” In Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review ed. by Charlotte Taylor, and Anna Marchi, 225–258. London: Routledge.
Gallacher, John D., and Marc W. Heerdink. 2019. “Measuring the effect of Russian Internet Research Agency information operations in online conversations.” Defence Strategic Communications 6: 155–198.
Guo, Fangjian, Charles Blundell, Hanna Wallach, and Katherine Heller. 2015. “The Bayesian Echo Chamber: Modeling Social influence via Linguistic Accommodation.” In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics 38: 315–323. PMLR. Available from [URL]
Hargreaves, Eduardo, Claudio Agosti, Daniel Menasché, Giovanni Neglia, Alexandre Reiffers-Masson, and Eitan Altman. 2018. “Biases in the Facebook News Feed: A Case Study on the Italian Elections.” IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, 806–812.
Hofstadter, Richard. 1964. “The Paranoid Style in American Politics.” Harper’s Magazine, 77–86. [URL] Retrieved on 31 March 2022.
Hunston, Susan. 2007. “Semantic Prosody Revisited.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12.2: 249–268.
Jacobson, Susan, Eunyoung Myung, and Steven L. Johnson. 2016. “Open Media or Echo Chamber: The Use of Links in Audience Discussions on the Facebook Pages of Partisan News Organizations.” Information, Communication & Society 19 (7): 875–891.
Klein, Colin, Clutton Peter, Dunn, Adam G. 2019. “Pathways to Conspiracy: The Social and Linguistic Precursors of Involvement in Reddit’s Conspiracy Theory Forum.” PLoS ONE 14 (11): e0225098.
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2001. “Checks and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics can Contribute to CDA.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 122–143. London: Sage.
Mikolov, Tomas, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. “Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.4546.
Nartey, Mark, and Isaac N. Mwinlaaru. 2019. “Towards a Decade of Synergising Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A Meta-analysis.” Corpora 14 (2): 203–235.
Oliveira, Ana Larissa Adorno Marciotto, and Marisa Mendonça Carneiro. 2020. “A Pragmatic View of Hashtags: The Case of Impoliteness and Offensive Verbal Behavior in the Brazilian Twitter.” Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture 42,
Oswald, Steve. 2016. “Conspiracy and Bias: Argumentative Features and Persuasiveness of Conspiracy Theories”. OSSA Conference Archive. 168. [URL]
Quattrociocchi, Walter, Guido Caldarelli, and Antonio Scala. 2014. “Opinion Dynamics on Interacting Networks: Media Competition and Social Influence.” Scientific Reports 4 (1): 1–7.
Rogers, Richard. 2018. “Digital Traces in Context| Otherwise Engaged: Social Media from Vanity Metrics to Critical Analytics.” International Journal of Communication 12: 23.
Rosenblum, Nancy L., and Russell Muirhead. 2019. A Lot of People Are Saying. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sanna, Leonardo, and Dario Compagno. 2020. “Implementing Eco’s Model Reader with Word Embeddings. An Experiment on Facebook Ideological Bots.” In JADT 2020: 15th International Conference on Statistical Analysis of Textual Data.
Sanna, Leonardo, Salvatore Romano, Giulia Corona, and Claudio Agosti. 2021. “YTTREX: Crowdsourced Analysis of YouTube’s Recommender System during COVID-19 Pandemic”. In Information Management and Big Data. SIMBig 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, ed. by Juan-Antonio Lossio-Ventura, Jorge Carlos Valverde-Rebaza, Eduardo Díaz, and Hugo Alatrista-Salas. Vol 1410. Springer, Cham.
Scott, Kate. 2015. “The Pragmatics of Hashtags: Inference and Conversational Style on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics 81: 8–20.
Stelter, Brian. 2020. Hoax: Donald Trump, Fox News, and the Dangerous Distortion of Truth. New York, Simon & Schuster.
Stubbs, Michael. 1996. Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tagg, Caroline, Philip Seargeant, and Amy Aisha Brown. 2017. Taking Offence on Social Media. Conviviality and Communication on Facebook. London: Palgrave.
Törnberg, Petter. 2018. “Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion.” PLoS ONE 13 (9): e0203958.
Törnberg, Petter, Claes Andersson, Kristian Lindgren, and Sven Banisch. 2021. “Modeling the Emergence of Affective Polarization in the Social Media Society.” PLoS ONE 16 (10): e0258259.
Van Eck, Christel W., Bob C. Mulder, and Sander van der Linden. 2021. “Echo Chamber Effects in the Climate Change Blogosphere.” Environmental Communication.
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Violi, Patrizia. 2000. “Prototypicality, Typicality and Context.” In Meaning and Cognition, ed. by Liliana Albertazzi, 103–123. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Wilson, Andrew. 2013. “Embracing Bayes Factors for Key Item Analysis in Corpus Linguistics.” In New Approaches to the Study of Linguistic Variability. Language Competence and Language Awareness in Europe, vol. 4, ed. by Markus Bieswanger, and Amei Koll-Stobbe, 3–11. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Wodak, Ruth. 2002. “Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 36 (10): 5–31.
Zappavigna, Michele. 2011. “Ambient Affiliation: A Linguistic Perspective on Twitter.” New Media & Society 13 (5): 788–806.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Musolff, Andreas
2025. Figurative framing in political interaction. In Framing in Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 354], ► pp. 99 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
