Cover not available

In:Conspiracy Theory Discourses
Edited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 98] 2022
► pp. 121–140

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 6
Fake conspiracy

Trump’s anti-Chinese ‘COVID-19-as-war’ scenario

ORCiD logo with link | University of East Anglia
Published online: 1 December 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98.06mus
Abstract
Conspiracy theories have an extraordinarily strong persuasive effect, as their huge increase during the public debate about the COVID-19 pandemic shows. How can they achieve such a communicative impact, given their flawed epistemic status? This chapter studies one COVID-19 related conspiracy theory, i.e. that the virus which caused the pandemic was “unleashed” by the Chinese government on the world, as propagated by the former US President Donald J. Trump and his political allies. Combining cognitive and pragmatic approaches, I analyse Trump’s metaphorical framing of the pandemic in terms of a war-like conflict with China as serving the goal of inducing the US public to suspend their “epistemic vigilance” (Sperber et al. 2010). The analysis shows that the application of epistemic vigilance hinges, inter alia, on the conspiracy theory’s figurative and narrative coherence. This analysis accounts both for the (qualified) success of Trump’s conspiracy theory and its weakness as regards the lack of corroborating ‘back-up’ arguments for his narrative. The result offers clues to ways of re-activating epistemic vigilance and thus, argumentative resistance, against conspiracy theories.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Trump’s “Chinese virus” claim as part of a figurative war scenario
  • 4.Discussion: The advantage of combining conspiracy theory and metaphor scenarios
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (63)
References
Augustyn, Rafał, and Ewelina Prażmo. 2020. “The Spread of Chinese Virus in the Internet Discourse: A Cognitive Semantic Analysis.” Gema Online Journal of Language Studies · November 2020, (accessed 29 November 2020).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banco, Erin, and Daniel Lippman. 2021. “Top Trump Officials Pushed the Coronavirus ‘Lab Leak’ Theory. Investigators had Doubts.” Politico, 16/06/2021.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, Benjamin R. 2020. “The (In)Appropriateness of the WAR Metaphor in Response to SARS-CoV-2: A Rapid Analysis of Donald J. Trump’s Rhetoric.” Frontiers in Communication 5: 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benziman, Yuval. 2020. “‘Winning’ the ‘battle’ and ‘beating’ the COVID-19 ‘enemy’: Leaders’ Use of War Frames to Define the Pandemic.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 26 (3): 247–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergmann, Eirikur. 2018. Conspiracy and Populism. The Politics of Misinformation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brooks, Brad. 2020. “Like the Flu? Trump’s Coronavirus Messaging Confuses Public, Pandemic Researchers Say”. Reuters, 14 March 2020. [URL] (accessed 29 May 2020).
Brugman, Britta C., Christian Burgers, and Gerard J. Steen. 2017. “Recategorizing political frames: a systematic review of metaphorical framing in experiments on political communication.” Annals of the International Communication Association 41 (2): 181–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruns, Axel, Stephen Harrington, and Edward Hurcombe. 2020. “‘Corona? 5G? or both?’: the dynamics of COVD-19/5G conspiracy theories on Facebook.” Media International Australia 177 (1): 12–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buckledee, Steve. 2018. The Language of Brexit: How Britain Talked Its Way Out of the European Union. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgers, Christian, Elly A. Konijn, and Gerard J. Steen. 2016. “Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse Through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony.” Communication Theory 26: 410–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butter, Michael, and Peter Knight. 2015. “Bridging the Great Divide: Conspiracy Theory Research for the 21st Century.” Diogenes, 62 (3–4): 17–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds). 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calvillo, Dustin P., Bryan J. Ross, Ryan J. B. Garcia, Thomas J. Smelter, and Abraham M. Rutchick. 2020. “Political ideology predicts perceptions of the threat of COVID-19 (and susceptibility to fake news about it). Social Psychological and Personality Science 11: 1119–1128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chan, Hoi-Wing, Connie Pui-Yee Chi, Shijiang Zuo, Xue Wang, Li Liu, and Ying-yi Hong. 2021. “Not-so-straightforward Links between Believing in COVID-19-Related Conspiracy Theories and Engaging in Disease-preventive Behaviours.” HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS 8:104. . (accessed 10 January 2022)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Metaphors of Brexit. No Cherries on the Cake? Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chiang, Wen-Yu and Ren-Feng Duann. 2007. “Conceptual metaphors for SARS: ‘war’ between whom?” Discourse & Society 18 (5): 579–602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cillizza, Chris. 2016. “Donald Trump’s Post-truth Campaign and What it Says about the Dismal State of US Politics.” The Independent, 10/05/2016. [URL]
Croucher, Stephen M., Thao Nguyen, and Diyako Rahmani. 2020. “Prejudice Toward Asian Americans in the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Effects of Social Media Use in the United States.” Frontiers in Communication 5. . (accessed 20 December 2021)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Ancona, Matthew. 2017. Post-Truth: The New War on truth and how to fight back. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Coninck, David, Thomas Frissen, Koen Matthijs, Leen d’Haenens Grégoire Lits, Olivier Champagne-Poirier, Marie-Eve Carignan, Marc D. David, Nathalie Pignard-Cheynel, Sébastien Salerno, and Melissa Généreux. 2021. “Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation About COVID-19: Comparative Perspectives on the Role of Anxiety, Depression and Exposure to and Trust in Information Sources.” Frontiers of Psychology 12:646394. . (accessed 20 November 2021)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demata, Massimiliano. 2018. “I think that Maybe I Wouldn’t be Here if it Wasn’t for Twitter. Donald Trump’s Populist Style on Twitter.” Textus 31 (1): 67–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm,” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evanega, Sarah, Mark Lynas, Jordan Adams, and Karinne Smolenjak. 2020. Coronavirus misinformation: quantifying sources and themes in the COVID-19 ‘infodemic’. Cornell University: [URL]; (accessed 20/12/2020)
Evon, Dan. 2020. “Was a 5G tower torn down in China to stop COVID-19?” Snopes, 2 April 2020. [URL] (accessed 28 May 2020).
Flusberg, Stephen J., Teenie Matlock, and Paul H. Thibodeau. 2018. “War metaphors in public discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 33 (1): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Georgiou, Neophytos, Paul Delfabbro, and Ryan Balzan. 2020. “COVID-19-related conspiracy beliefs and their relationship with perceived stress and pre-existing conspiracy beliefs.” Personality and Individual Differences 166: 110201. (accessed 28 May 2020).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. [1975] 1989. “Logic and conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words, 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartman, Todd K., Michael Marshall, Thomas V. A. Stocks, Ryan McKay, Kate Bennett, Sarah Butter, Jilly Gibson Miller, Philip Hyland, Liat Levita, Anton P. Martinez, Liam Mason, Orla McBride, Jamie Murphy, Mark Shevlin, Frédérique Vallières, and Richard P. Bentall. 2021. “Different Conspiracy Theories Have Different Psychological and Social Determinants: Comparison of Three Theories About the Origins of the COVID-19 Virus in a Representative Sample of the UK Population.” Frontiers in Political Science (accessed 28 November 2021)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodgkin, Paul. 1985. “Medicine is War: and Other Medical Metaphors.” British Medical Journal 291: 1820–1821. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imhoff, Roland, and Pia Lamberty. 2020. “A Bioweapon or a Hoax? The Link between Distinct Conspiracy Beliefs about the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak and Pandemic Behavior.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 11 (8): 1110–1118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keeley, Brian. 1999. “Of Conspiracy Theories.” The Journal of Philosophy 96 (3): 109–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koley, Tapas Kumar, and Monika Dhole. 2021. The COVID-19 Pandemic. The Deadly Coronavirus Outbreak. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980/2003. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Elisabeth Wehling. 2016. Your Brain’s Politics. How the Science of Mind Explains the Political Divide. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markowitz, David M., Brittany Shoots-Reinhard, Ellen Peters, Michael C. Silverstein, Raleigh Goodwin, and Pär Bjälkebring. 2021. “Dehumanization during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Frontiers in Psychology 12. . (accessed 24 May 2021)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maxmen, Amy, and Smiriti Mallapaty. 2021. “The COVID Lab-leak Hypothesis: What Scientists do and don’t Know.” Nature 08/06/2021. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Momtaz, Rym. 2020. “Inside Macron’s Coronavirus War.” Politico 15 April 2020. [URL] (accessed 25 April 2020)
Musolff, Andreas. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “Factual Narrative and Truth in Political Discourse.” In Narrative Factuality. A Handbook, ed. by Monika Fludernik, and Marie-Laure Ryan, 351–365. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. “’War against COVID-19’: Is the pandemic as war Metaphor Helpful or Hurtful?”. In Pandemic and Crisis Discourse, ed. by Andreas Musolff, Ruth Breeze, Sara Vilar-Lluch, and Kayo Kondo, 307–320. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neagu, Mariana. 2022. “Metaphoric Framings of Fighting COVID-19.” In Pandemic and Crisis Discourse, ed. by Andreas Musolff, Ruth Breeze, Sara Vilar-Lluch, and Kayo Kondo, 255–270. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oborne, Peter, and Tom Roberts. 2017. How Trump Thinks: His Tweets and the Birth of a New Political Language. London: Head of Zeus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Molly Xie, and Joanna Zhuoan Chen. 2022. “When wars are good: Emotional unpacking anti-coronavirus measures through metaphors in HK press conferences.” In Pandemic and Crisis Discourse, ed. by Andreas Musolff, Ruth Breeze, Sara Vilar-Lluch, and Kayo Kondo, 225–240. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renard, Jean Bruno. 2015. “What Causes people to Believe Conspiracy Theories?” Diogenes, 62 (3–4): 71–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seixas, Eunice Castro. 2021. “War Metaphors in Political Communication on Covid-19.” Frontiers in Sociology 5:538680. . (accessed 28 November 2021)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silaški, Nadežda, and Tatjana Đurović. 2022. “From a Threatening Enemy to a Corona Tsunami: Adjusting the COVID-19 Pandemic Metaphors to Political Agendas in Serbian Public Discourse.” In Pandemic and Crisis Discourse, ed. by Andreas Musolff, Ruth Breeze, Sara Vilar-Lluch, and Kayo Kondo, 271–284. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan. 1991. Illness as Metaphor. Aids and its Metaphors. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson. 2010. “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind & Language 25 (4): 359–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steuter, Erin, and Deborah Wills. 2008. At War with Metaphor. Media, Propaganda, and Racism in the War on Terror. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., and Adrian Vermeule. 2009. “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2): 202–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trump, Donald. 2020a. Remarks by President Trump, Vice President Pence, and Members of the Coronavirus Task Force in Press Conference, 26 February 2020. [URL] (accessed 26 April 2021)
. 2020b. Oval Office Speech on the Coronavirus Outbreak, 11 March 2020. [URL] (accessed 26 April 2021)
. 2020c. Remarks by President Trump, Vice President Pence, and Members of the Coronavirus Task Force in Press Briefing, 17 March 2020; [URL] (accessed 26 April 2021).
. 2020d. Remarks by President Trump, Vice President Pence, and Members of the Coronavirus Task Force in Press Briefing, 01 April 2020; [URL]. (accessed 26 April 2021)
. 2020e. Remarks by President Trump, Vice President Pence, and Members of the Coronavirus Task Force in Press Briefing, 10 April 2020; [URL] (accessed 26 April 2021)
. 2020f. Remarks by President Trump in Press Conference, 14 July 2020; [URL] (accessed 26 April 2021)
. 2020g. United Nations General Assembly Speech, 21 September 2020. VOX.com, 22 September 2020, [URL] (accessed 26 April 2021)
United Kingdom Government. 2020. 5G and coronavirus (COVID-19). 6 May 2020. [URL] (accessed 28 May 2020).
United Nations. 2020. COVID-19: “5G broadband conspiracy ‘a hoax with no technical basis’.” UN Telecoms Agency, 22 April 2020. [URL] (accessed 28 May 2020).
WHO. 2015. Best Practices for the Naming of New Human Infectious Diseases. World Health Organization, May 2020; [URL]. (accessed 20 April 2021).
. 2020. Naming the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the virus that causes it, 11 February 2020. [URL] (accessed 28 May 2020).
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Augé, Anaïs
2025. France’s “drôle de guerre”. Journal of Language and Politics 24:3 ► pp. 483 ff. DOI logo
Dayter, Daria & Sofia Rüdiger
2025. Persuasion and Influence in Linguistic Research. In Manipulation, Influence and Deception, ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Grogan, Kimberly & Elise Stickles
2025. ‘Climate cults’ and ‘climate sins’. Metaphor and the Social World DOI logo
Iori, Ilaria
2025. WAR Metaphors and Agency: The Case of the COP27 News Coverage. Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation (LCM Journal) 11:2 DOI logo
Trimithiotis, Dimitris & Theodosia Demetriou
2025. When pro-vaccine media discourses meet vaccine hesitancy. Journal of Language and Politics DOI logo
van Dijk, Teun A.
2025. Discourse and Ideologies of the Radical Right, DOI logo
Musolff, Andreas
2023. Permacrisis, Conspiracy Stories and Metaphors. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium 8:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Musolff, Andreas
2025. An Unlikely ‘Traitor’ in the ‘War’ against Covid-19: Dr Anthony Fauci. Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation (LCM Journal) 11:2 DOI logo
Musolff, Andreas
2025. Figurative framing in political interaction. In Framing in Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 354], ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. (Re)framing Persuasion. In Manipulation, Influence and Deception, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue