Cover not available

In:Conspiracy Theory Discourses
Edited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 98] 2022
► pp. 25–48

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 2
A corpus-driven exploration of conspiracy theorising as a discourse type

Lexical indicators of argumentative patterning

ORCiD logo with link | University of Milan
Published online: 1 December 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98.02cat
Abstract
This chapter takes a view of conspiracy theorising as a discourse type and seeks to identify candidate linguistic features of such discourse in a corpus of books devoted to 9/11 conspiracy theories. Adopting a corpus-driven approach, the study identifies three discursive traits which appear prominent in conspiracy discourse. The first trait concerns a high incidence of metadiscursive references to terms such as report, version and story, which are associated with negatively evaluative verbs (for example, claim) when premodified by the adjective official, and tend to co-occur with verbs such as emerge when referring to conspiracy theorists’ preferred versions. The second regards the frequent recourse to terms such as evidence (lack of which characterizes official stories) and facts (typically posited to be at the heart of conspiratorial versions). Finally, the study identifies the salience of hypothetical structures, signalled by the recurrent use of the modal would, which question official accounts using a modus tollens form of confutational argumentation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction, aim and scope of research
  • 2.Corpus and method
  • 3.The 911CT corpus: Preliminary insights from corpus analysis
    • 3.1Delving deeper into the data: Qualitative investigation
      • 3.1.1Official accounts, stories and versions
      • 3.1.2Contested epistemologies: Hard (or no) evidence, and obvious facts
      • 3.1.3“Surely if a plane is ‘vaporized’ then the occupants would be vaporized too?”: Refutational argumentation and modus tollens
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
References (33)
References
Aupers, Stef. 2020. “Decoding Mass Media/encoding Conspiracy Theory.” In The Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory, ed. by Michael Butter and Peter Knight, 469–482. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baden, Christian, and Tzlil Sharon. 2021. “BLINDED BY THE LIES? Toward an Integrated Definition of Conspiracy Theories.” Communication Theory 31 (1): 82–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michael Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butter, Michael, and Peter Knight (eds). 2020a. The Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020b. “Conspiracy Theory in Historical, Cultural and Literary Studies.” In The Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory, ed. by Michael Butter and Peter Knight, 28–42. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byford, Jovan. 2011. Conspiracy Theories: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deschrijver, Cedric. 2021. “On the Metapragmatics of ‘Conspiracy Theory’: Scepticism and Epistemological Debates in Online Conspiracy Comments.” Journal of Pragmatics 182: 310–321 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas, and Alison Duguid. 2014. “Corpus Linguistics and CDA: A Critical Look at Synergy”. CDA20+ Symposium, University of Amsterdam, 9 September 2014.
Giachanou, Anastasia, Bilal Ghanem, and Paolo Rosso. 2021. “Detection of Conspiracy Propagators Using Psycho-linguistic Characteristics.” Journal of Information Science. January 2021. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giry, Julien, and Pranvera Tika. 2020. “Conspiracy Theories in Political Science and Political Theory.” In The Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory, ed. by Michael Butter and Peter Knight, 108–120. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gualda Caballero, Estrella. 2020. “Social Network Analysis, Social Big Data and Conspiracy Theories.” In The Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory, ed. by Michael Butter and Peter Knight, 135–147. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel, and Erik Stei. 2011. “How Quotation Marks what People do with Words.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (10): 2650–2663. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1964. “The Paranoid Style in American Politics.” Harper’s Magazine, November 1964, available at [URL]
Keeley, Brian L. 1999. “Of Conspiracy Theories.” The Journal of Philosophy 96 (3): 109–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vít Suchomel. 2014. “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years on.” Lexicography 1: 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Olivier and Kenzo Nera. 2020. “Social Psychology of Conspiracy Theories.” In The Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory, ed. by Michael Butter and Peter Knight, 121–134. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kou, Yubo, Xinning Gui, Yunan Chen, and Kathleen H. Pine. 2017. “Conspiracy Talk on Social Media: Collective Sensemaking during a Public Health Crisis.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1, CSCW, Article 61 (November 2017), Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leone, Massimo, Mari-Liis Madisson and Andreas Ventsel. 2020. “Semiotic Approaches to Conspiracy Theories.” In The Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory, ed. by Michael Butter and Peter Knight, 43–55. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1992 [1979]. “Activity Types and Language.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Madisson, Mari-Liis, and Andreas Ventsel. 2021. Strategic Conspiracy Narratives. A Semiotic Approach. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKenzie-McHarg, Andrew. 2020. “Conceptual History and Conspiracy Theory.” In The Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theory, ed. by Michael Butter and Peter Knight, 16–27. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miskimmon, Alister, Ben O’Loughlin, and Laura Roselle (eds). 2017. Introduction. In Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International Relations, ed. by Alister Miskimmon, Ben O’Loughlin and Laura Roselle, 1–22. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oswald, Steve. 2016. “Conspiracy and Bias: Argumentative Features and Fersuasiveness of Conspiracy Theories.” OSSA Conference Archive. 168. [URL]
Pipes, Daniel. 1998. Conspiracy: The Power of the Paranoid Style in History. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Predelli, Stefano. 2003. “Scare Quotes and their Relation to Other Semantic Issues.” Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (1): 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robins, Robert S., and Jerrold M. Post. 1997. Political Paranoia: The Psychopolitics of Hatred. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samory, Mattia, and Tanushree Mitra. 2018. “The Government Spies Using Our Webcams: The Language of Conspiracy Theories in Online Discussions.” Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 152 (November 2018), Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant. 2000. “ATs, DTs and Interactional Hybridity: The Case of Genetic Counselling.” In Discourse and Social Life, ed. by Srikant Sarangi and Malcolm Coulthard, 1–27. Longman: Harlow.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Southwell, Brian G., Emily A. Thorson, and Laura Sheble (eds.). 2018. Misinformation and Mass Audiences, Austin, TX: The University of Texas Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., and Adrian Vermeule. 2009. “Symposium on Conspiracy Theories. Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2): 202–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tangherlini, Timothy R., Shadi Shahsavari, Behnam Shahbazi, Ehsan Ebrahimzadeh, and Vwani Roychowdhury. 2020. “An Automated Pipeline for the Discovery of Conspiracy and Conspiracy Theory Narrative Frameworks: Bridgegate, Pizzagate and Storytelling on the Web.” PLoS ONE 15 (6): e0233879. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, Michael J. 2018. “Propagating and Debunking Conspiracy Theories on Twitter During the 2015–2016 Zika Virus Outbreak.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, And Social Networking 21 (8): 485–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, Michael J., and Karen M. Douglas. 2013. “What about Building 7? A Social Psychological Study of Online Discussion of 9/11 Conspiracy Theories.” Frontiers in Psychology 4: 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Stumpf, Sören
2025. Syntaktische Negation in Verschwörungstheorien: Eine diskursgrammatische Untersuchung der Inexistenz-Konstruktion [ es gibt kein X]. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 53:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Deschrijver, Cedric
2024. News media’s epistemological framings of the Covid-19 ‘lab leak’ hypothesis. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue