Cover not available

In:Science Communication in Times of Crisis
Edited by Pascal Hohaus
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 96] 2022
► pp. 119–142

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 6
Persuasion in health communication

The case of Saudi and Australian tweets on COVID-19 vaccination

 | College of Humanities & Sciences, Prince Sultan University
Published online: 10 August 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.96.06eld
Abstract
This study examined the persuasive strategies employed by the Saudi and Australian departments of health to encourage the public to take the COVID-19 vaccines. I analysed 200 tweets using an adaptation of Dontcheva-Navratilova, Adam, Povolná and Vogel’s (2020) model of persuasion. The results showed that Australian tweets included significantly more logos strategies while the Saudi tweets were the only ones that employed pathos strategies. As for ethos, the Saudi and Australian tweets included similar numbers of appeals although their use of the relevant strategies varied. A qualitative analysis of the tweets revealed additional differences, such as more frequent use of questions by Australians, more frequent use of performatives by Saudis and the inclusion of religious discourse in the Saudi tweets.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Theoretical background
  • Literature review
  • Methodology
    • Data collection
    • Data coding
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • Appendix
References (41)
References
Al-Momani, Kawakib R. 2014. “Strategies of persuasion in letters of complaint in academic context: The case of Jordanian university students’ complaints”. Discourse Studies 16 (6): 705–728. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altwell, Katie, Jeremy K. Ward and Sian Tomkinson. 2021. “Manufacturing consent for vaccine mandates: A comparative case study of communication campaigns in France and Australia.” Frontiers in Communication 6: 1–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Álvarez, Irina A. and Alfonso Muñoz. 2012. “An insight into Twitter: A corpus based contrastive study in English and Spanish.” Revista de Lingüístice y Lenguas Aplicadas 7: 37–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berlanga, Inmaculada, Francisco García-García and Juan S. Victoria. 2013. “Ethos, pathos and logos in Facebook user networking: New “Rhetor” of the 21st century.” Communicar: Scientific Journal of Media Education 41 (21): 127–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1978. “Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena.” In Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, ed. by Esther N. Goody, 56–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chou, Wen-Ying S. and Alexandra Budenz. (2020). “Considering emotion in COVID-19 vaccine communication: Addressing vaccine hesitancy and fostering vaccine confidence.” Health Communication 35 (14): 1718–1722. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Decker, Benny, Reinhild VandeKerckhove and Dominiek Sandra. 2016. “When two basic principles class: about the validity of written chat language as a research tool for spoken language variation. Flemish Chatspeak as a Test Case.” Journal of Language Contact 9 (1): 101–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga, Martin Adam, Renata Povolná and Radek Vogel. 2020. Persuasion in specialised discourses. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
El-Dakhs, Dina A. S. and Mervat M. Ahmed. 2021. “A variational pragmatic analysis of the speech act of complaint focusing on Alexandrians and Najdis.” Journal of Pragmatics 181: 120–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faasse, Kate, Chatman, Casey J. Chatman and Leslie R. Martin. 2016. “A comparison of language use in pro-and anti-vaccination comments in response to a high profile Facebook post.” Vaccine 34 (47): 5808–5814. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanani, Achmad, Slamet Setiawan, Oikurema Purwati, Maisarah Maisarah and Uswatun Qoyyimah. 2020. “Donald Trump’s grammar of persuasion in his speech.” Heliyon 6 (1): 1–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabrielova, Elena V. and Olga I. Maksimenko. 2021. Implicit vs explicit evaluation: How English-speaking Twitter users discuss migration problems. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (1): 105–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Edward T. 1976. Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Brooks/Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higgins, Colin and Robyn Walker. 2012. “Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports.” Accounting Forum 36 (3): 194–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, Jemma H. O. 2020. “Logos, ethos, pathos and the marketing of higher education.” Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 3 (1): 87–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert. 2001. Culture’s consequence: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hosni, Hala Rashed. 2020. “Advice giving in Egyptian Arabic and American English: A cross-linguistic, cross-cultural study.” Journal of Pragmatics 155: 193–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, Juliane and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2021. Cross-cultural pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, Guanqwei and Feng Cao. 2011. “Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (11): 2785–2809. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamimura, Taeko and Kyoko Oi. 1998. “Argumentative strategies in American and Japanese English.” World Englishes 17 (3): 307–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klymenko, Olga. 2019. “Twitterserve: The birth of new words.” Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 4 (11): 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krishnan, Isai A., Teoh Mei Lin, Hee Sio Ching, Selvajothi Ramalingam and Elanttamil Maruthai. 2020. “Using rhetorical approach of ethos, pathos and logos by Malaysian Engineering students in persuasive email writings.” Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 5 (4): 19–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lamichhane, Yog R. 2017. “The role of Aristotelian appeals in influencing consumer behavior.” Journal of Development and Social Engineering 3 (1): 65–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ma, Jinxuan and Lynne Stahl. 2017. “A multimodal critical discourse analysis of anti-vaccine information on Facebook.” Library and Information Science Research 39 (4): 303–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mao, LuMing R. 1993. “Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed.” Journal of Pragmatics 21 (5): 451–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mckinnon, Merryn and Lindy A. Orthia. 2017. “Vaccination communication strategies: What have we learned and lost in 200 years?” Journal of Science Communication 16 (3): 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mønsted, Bjarke and Sune Lehmann. 2022. “Characterizing polarization in online vaccine discourse-A large-scale study.” PLoS ONE 17 (2): e0263746. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mpofu, Shepherd. 2019. “Jesus comes to South Africa: Black Twitter as citizen journalism in South Africa politics.” African Journal Studies 40 (1): 67–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. 2016, August 4. Internet access – households and individuals: 2016. Retrieved from: [URL]
O’Reilly, Tim and Sarah Milstein. 2009. The Twitter book. Sebastopol: O’Relley Media Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perloff, Richard M. 2010. “Dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the twenty-first century.” New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samuel-Azran, Tal, Moran Yarchi and Gadi Wolfsfed. 2015. “Aristotelian rhetoric and Facebook success in Israel’s 2013 election campaigns.” Online Information Review 39 (2): 149–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2008. Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory continuum. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, Richard K. 2006. Health Communication. New York: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uysal, Hacer U. 2012. “Argumentation across L1 and L2 writing: Exploring cultural influences and transfer issues.” Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 9 (1): 133–159.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Von Rohr, Marie-Thérèse R. 2018. Persuasion in smoking cessation online: An interpersonal pragmatics perspective. An unpublished doctorate thesis at University of Freiburg, Germany. Retrieved from: [URL]
Willerton, Russell. 2008. “Writing toward readers’ better health: A case study examining the development of online health information.” Technical Communication Quarterly 17 (3): 311–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhiyong, Dai. 2016. “Logos, pathos and ethos in David Cameron’s political speech: A rhetorical analysis.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 6 (2): 63–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Yunxia. 2013. “A cross-cultural analysis of English and Chinese business faxes: A genre perspective.” Ibérica 26 (1): 35–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam & Mervat M. Ahmed
2025. Persuasion Strategies in Facebook Health Communication: A Comparative Study between Egypt and the United Kingdom. Open Cultural Studies 9:1 DOI logo
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam, Mervat M. Ahmed & Nahlah Mardini
2025. A pragmatic study of the X complaints and responses to complaints. Language and Dialogue 15:2 ► pp. 232 ff. DOI logo
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam, Noorchaya Yahya & Buthainah M. Al Thowaini
2025. Persuading in Arabic and English: A Study of EFL Argumentative Writing in Contrast with Native English Norms. Open Cultural Studies 9:1 DOI logo
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam, Laila Mardini & Lutfia Alhabbad
2024. The persuasive strategies in more and less prestigious linguistics journals: focus on research article abstracts. Cogent Arts & Humanities 11:1 DOI logo
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam & Nermine Galal Ibrahim
2023. The realization of the speech acts of complaint and responding to complaint in Vodafone Egypt versus Vodafone UK. Language and Dialogue 13:3 ► pp. 336 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue