Cover not available

In:Science Communication in Times of Crisis
Edited by Pascal Hohaus
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 96] 2022
► pp. 15–40

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 2
Which facts to trust in the debate on climate change?

On knowledge and plausibility in times of crisis

 | University of Kassel
 | University of Kassel
Published online: 10 August 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.96.02boh
Abstract
The assumption that the truth of facts is at the centre of knowledge crises would seem to suggest fact-checking or providing additional facts as methods of resolution. In this paper, this is reflected on by utilizing two complementary perspectives: an epistemological approach guided by theoretical positions from Philosophy of Science and a pragmalinguistic approach using methods of Applied Discourse Analysis. We argue that although facts are necessary in science communication, they are not sufficient. Instead, we suggest focusing on this question: To what extent do we consider a statement plausible? By dissecting a historical and a present case (geocentrism, climate change) and applying the complementary approaches described above, the relevance of their respective epistemic systems (Goldman 2010) and what we call ‘settings of comprehension’ can be revealed. In this process, it can be demonstrated why what some people consider absurd, others consider plausible, and vice versa. On this basis, science communication can operate from a more deliberate level.
Article outline
  • Introduction: The state of facts in knowledge crises
  • Questioning knowledge
  • Questioning facts
  • Asking a different question
  • Plausibility as a pattern of thinking and reasoning
  • Dissecting two knowledge crises
    • The dispute between Galileo and Bellarmine
    • Harald Lesch’s “Clarifying misconceptions about climate change”
    • James Inhofe’s senate speech on climate change
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (58)
References
Andriessen, Daniel. 2010. “The Aptness of Knowledge Related Metaphors. A Research Agenda.” In The Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Intellectual Capital, ed. by Susana Rodrigues, 59–66. Reading: Academic Publishing Limited.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. 1997. “The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Justification and Knowledge.” American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (4): 405–422.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ayer, Alfred J. 1956. The Problem of Knowledge. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrera, Oscar, Sergei Guriev, Emeric Henry, and Ekaterina Zhuravskaya. 2020. “Facts, Alternative Facts, and Fact Checking in Times of Post-Truth Politics.” Journal of Public Economics 182 (2): 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bittlingmayer, Uwe H. 2001. “‘Spätkapitalismus’ oder ‘Wissensgesellschaft’?” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B36: 15–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blackwell, Richard J. 1991. Galileo, Bellarmine, and the Bible. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Böhnert, Martin. 2020. Methodologische Signaturen. Ein philosophischer Versuch zur Systematisierung der empirischen Erforschung des Geistes von Tieren. Paderborn: Mentis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Böhnert, Martin, and Paul Reszke. 2015. “Linguistisch-philosophische Untersuchungen zu Plausibilität. Über kommunikative Grundmuster bei der Entstehung von wissenschaftlichen Tatsachen.” In Auf der Suche nach den Tatsachen: Proceedings der 1. Tagung des Nachwuchsnetzwerks ‘INSIST’, 22.–23. Oktober 2014, Berlin, ed. by Julia Engelschalt, and Arne Maibaum, 40–67. Köln: SSOAR. [URL]
Boghossian, Paul. 2011. “Epistemic Relativism Defended.” In Social Epistemology: Essential Readings, ed. by Alvin I. Goldman, and Dennis Whitcomb, 38–53. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coyne, George V. 2011. “Galileo and Bellarmine.” The Inspiration of Astronomical Phenomena VI ASP Conference Series 441: 3–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. 1994. “Marvelous Facts and Miraculous Evidence in Early Modern Europe.” In Questions of Evidence: Proof, Practice and Persuasion Across the Disciplines, ed. by James Chandler, Arnold I. Davidson, and Harry D. Harootunian, 243–274. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 1992. “The Image of Objectivity.” Representations 40: 81–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeRose, Keith. 2002. “Assertion, Knowledge, and Context.” Philosophical Review 111 (2): 167–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunlap, Riley E., and Aaron M. McCright. 2011. “Organized Climate Change Denial.” In The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, ed. by John S. Dryzek, Richard B. Norgaard, and David Schlosberg, 144–160. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dutant, Julien. 2015. “The Legend of the Justified True Belief Analysis.” Philosophical Perspectives 29 (1): 95–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faulkner, Paul. 2000. “The Social Character of Testimonial Knowledge.” The Journal of Philosophy 97 (11): 581–601. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “On Dreaming and Being Lied To.” Episteme 2 (3): 149–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finocchiaro, Maurice A., ed. 1989. The Galileo Affair: A Documentary History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleck, Ludwik. 1979. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frandsen, Finn, and Winni Johansen. 2017. Organizational Crisis Communication: A Multivocal Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardt, Andreas. 2018. “Wissenskonstitution im Text.” In Handbuch Text und Gespräch, ed. by Karin Birkner, and Nina Janich, 52–79. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I. 2010. “System-Oriented Social Epistemology.” Oxford Studies in Epistemology 3: 189–214.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1975. The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornuff, Daniel. 2017. “Wissenschaft im postfaktischen Zeitalter. Sieben Thesen.” ZiF-Mitteilungen 22 (3): 68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ichikawa, Jonathan J., and Matthias Steup. 2017. “The Analysis of Knowledge.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab. [URL] (accessed 17 July 2021).
infratest dimap. 2015. Glaubwürdigkeit der Medien. Published October 31st by infratest dimap. [URL]
Inhofe, James. 2015. Senate Speech on Climate Change. Filmed February 25th at the United States Capitol, Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C. Video, 1:30:28–1:53:31. [URL]
Kaplan, Mark. 1985. “It’s Not What You Know that Counts.” The Journal of Philosophy 82 (7): 350–363. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, Lutz. 2002. “Versuch über Plausibilität.” In Rhetorik Argumentation Geltung, ed. by Andreas Dörpinghaus, and Karl Helmer, 193–204. Würzburg: Könighausen & Neumann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Konerding, Klaus-Peter. 2015. “Sprache und Wissen.” In Handbuch Sprache und Wissen, ed. by Ekkehard Felder, and Andreas Gardt, 57–80. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1982. “Krise.” In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, ed. By Otto Brunner, Werner Conze, and Reinhart Koselleck, 617–650. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lackey, Jennifer. 1999. “Testimonial Knowledge and Transmission.” The Philosophical Quarterly 49 (197): 471–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1978. “History of Science and its Rational Reconstruction.” In The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers, vol 1, ed. by John Worrall, and Gregory Currie, 102–138. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lesch, Harald. 2019. Missverständnisse zum Klimawandel aufgeklärt. Published July 31st by Terra X Lesch & Co. Video, 20:55. [URL]
Longino, Helen, and Ruth Doell. 1983. “Body, Bias, and Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of Reasoning in Two Areas of Biological Science.” Signs 9 (2): 206–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luengo, María, and David García-Marín. 2020. “The Performance of Truth: Politicians, Fact-Checking Journalism, and the Struggle to Tackle COVID-19 Misinformation.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology 8 (3): 405–427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1980. “Gesellschaftliche Struktur und semantische Tradition.” In Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik. Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft, ed. by. Niklas Luhmann, 9–71, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lüthje, Corinna. 2017. “Field-Specific Mediatization: Testing the Combination of Social Theory and Mediatization Theory Using the Example of Scientific Communication.” Mediatization Studies 1 (1): 45–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nieminen, Sakari, and Valtteri Sankari. 2021. “Checking PolitiFact’s Fact-Checks” Journalism Studies 22 (3): 358–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
OED Online. 2021. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL] (accessed July 17, 2021).
Owens, David. 2006. “Testimony and Assertion.” Philosophical Studies 130 (1): 105–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rich, Tomothy S., Ian Milden, Mallory T. Wagner. 2020. “Research Note: Does the Public Support Fact-Checking Social Media? It Depends Whom and How You Ask.” Misinformation Review 1 (8): 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rödder, Simone. 2018. “Differenzierungstheorie. Ein soziologischer Faktencheck der Diagnose eines ‘postfaktischen Zeitalters’.” In 10 Minuten Soziologie. Fakten, ed. by. Gianna Behrendt, and Anna Henkel, 17–34. Bielefeld: Transcript. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1971. Problems of Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1994. A Social History of Truth. Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shin, Jieun, and Kjerstin Thorson. 2017. “Partisan Selective Sharing: The Biased Diffusion of Fact Checking Messages on Social Media.” Journal of Communication 67 (2): 233–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tereick, Jana. 2016. Klimawandel im Diskurs. Multimediale Diskursanalyse Crossmedialer Korpora. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winko, Simone. 2015. “Zur Plausibilität als Beurteilungskriterium literaturwissenschaftlicher Interpretationen.” In Theorien, Methoden und Praktiken des Interpretierens, ed. by Andrea Albrecht, Lutz Dannenberg, Olav Krämer, and Carlos Spoerhase, 483–512. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969. On Certainty. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Worsnip, Alex. 2017. “Contextualism and Knowledge Norms.” In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism, ed. by Jonathan J. Ichikawa, 177–190. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ryan, Jonathon
2025. The big global issues: Applied linguists and transdisciplinarity beyond SLA. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 529 ff. DOI logo
Savolainen, Reijo
2024. Fact-checking of political information about the Russo-Ukrainian conflict. Journal of Documentation 80:7 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue