In:History, Discourse, and Policy in Modern Turkey
Alper Çakmak
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 95] 2021
► pp. 35–92
Chapter 3(De?) constructing and rewriting the history
Figures and events
Published online: 26 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.95.c3
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.95.c3
Abstract
This chapter proceeds methodically to scrutinizing the assumption that examining imagined representations of crucial historical figures and affairs that consolidate an alternative reading of modern Turkish history is the main essence of understanding the influence of Ottoman admiration re-writing the past. Before exploring the elements of the discourse and policy relationship, a major issue worth analyzing is the discursive forge that deconstructs and reconstructs the tenets/components of Turkish history and political culture. The chapter primarily reveals discourses of deconstruction and reconstruction through CDA and DHA. The political discourse of reconstruction is the central pillar that paves the way for the discursive introduction of a new paradigm in which a rhetorician is positioned as the most suitable narrator and agent of action. On the grounds of reciprocal constructive identification with others, the discourse of deconstruction scapegoats the opposition for the malaises of the present, whereas the discourse of reconstruction rebuilds the in-group as superior to all others.
Article outline
- 3.1Pro-Tutelage vs Neo-Ottoman Readings on the History of the Turkish Republic
- 3.2Introduction of the commemoration of Kut-Al-Amara, re-imagining the Sick Man of Europe
- 3.3The discourse of history during Gezi Park protests
- 3.4An Ottoman officer and the founding father: Ghazi Mustafa Kemal vs Atatürk
- 3.5Discourse on coups and coup attempts
- 3.6Borders of heart: Discrediting Lausanne Treaty & negotiators
- 3.7Discourse going beyond the alleged history: Myth-writing
Notes
