Get fulltext from our e-platform
Abbott, A. (1988). The System of Professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Agha, A. (2005). Introduction. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. Volume 15, 1. Pages 1–5. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, P. and Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera’s immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry. Vol. 3(3), pp. 304–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History. 7(1–4), pp. 335–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. and Georgakopoulou, A. 2008. Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text and Talk. Vol. 28(3), pp. 377–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbour, R. (2007). Doing focus groups. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbour, R. and Kitzinger, J. (1999). (eds) Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Research and Practice. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauman, R. (2004). A World of Other’s Words. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baynham, M. (2011). Stance, positioning, and alignment in narratives of professional experience. Language in Society. Vol. 40, pp. 63–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazemore, G. (2000). Community justice and a vision of collective efficacy: The case of restorative conferencing. In Horney, J. (ed.) Policies, Processes, and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beach, W. (1990). Language as and in technology: Facilitating topic organization in a videotext focus group meeting. In M. J. Medhurst (Ed.), Communication and the Culture of Technology, pp. 197–220. Pullman, WA: Washington State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beach, W. and Terri Metzger, T. (1997). Claiming insufficient knowledge. Human Communication Research 23: pp. 562–588. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, K. (2016). Pragmatic Markers in British English. New York: Cambridge U. Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beyea, S. C. and Nicoll, L. H. (2000). Collecting, analyzing, and interpreting focus group data. Acorn Journal. Vol. 71(6), pp. 1281–1283.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., and Finegan, E. 1999. Grammar of Spoken and Written English. NewYork: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., and Robson, K. (2001). Focus Groups in Social Research. London: Sage Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blyth Jr., C., Recktenwald, S. and Wang, J. (1990). I’m Like, “Say What?!”: A New Quotative in American Oral Narrative. American Speech, 65: pp. 215–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of Capital. In J. E. Richardson (ed), Handbook of Theory of Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–258.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briggs, C. (1986). Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Interview. In Senft, G., Ostman, J., and Verschueren, J. (eds.) Culture and Language Use. (Handbook of pragmatic highlights 2). John Benjamins Publishing pp. 202–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carr, E. S. (2010). Enactments of expertise. Annual Review of Anthropology. 39, pp. 17–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chappell, A. and Lanza-Kaduce, L. (2010). Police academy socialization: Understanding the lessons learned in a paramilitary-bureaucratic organization. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 39(2), pp. 187–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. (2007). Discourse variation, grammaticalization and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 11(2), pp. 155–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clear, T. and Karp, D. (1999). The Community Justice Ideal. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, A. (1985). The Symbolic Construction of Community. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, K. (2015). Institutions, trust, and social Order. In Lawler, E., Shane, T. and Yoon, J. Order on the Edge of Chaos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 125–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Craig, R. and Sanusi, A. (2000). ‘I’m just saying …”: Discourse markers of standpoint continuity. Argumentation. 14, pp. 425–445. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crow, Graham What are Community Studies. (2018). NY: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debras, C. (2017). The Shrug. Gesture 16 (1): 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Fina, A. and Georgakpoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Jorio, Andrea. (2000). Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity. A translation of La mimica degli antichi investigata nel gestire napoletano (1832), and with an Introduction and Notes, by Adam Kendon. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Positioning. In The Handbook of Narrative Analysis. DeFina, A., and Georgakopoulou, A. (eds) NY: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 369–387.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dines, E. (1980). Variation in discourse ‘And stuff like that’. Language in Society 9: pp. 13–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, P. and Holt, E. (1988). Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems. 35, 4. 398–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DuBois, B. (1989). Pseudoquotation in current English communication; “Hey, she didn’t really say it.” Language in Society. 18, pp. 343–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erickson, F. and Schultz, J. (1982). Counselor as Gatekeeper: Social Interaction in Interviews. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erikson, K. T. (1978). Everything in its Path: Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek Flood. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse. New York: Routlege. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrara, K. and Bell, B. (1995). Sociolinguistic Variation and Discourse Function of Constructed Dialogue Introducers: The Case of Be+Like. American Speech, 70: pp. 265–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filipi, A. and Wales, R. (2003). Differential uses of okay, right, and alright, and their function in signaling perspective shift or maintenance in a map task. Semiotica. 147(1/4), pp. 429–455.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleming, L. and Lempert, M. (2014). Poetics and Performativity. In N. Enfield, P. Kockelman and J. Sidnell (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 485–515. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox Tree, J. and Schrock, J. (2002). Basic Meanings of You Know and I Mean. Journal of Pragmatics . 34, pp. 727–747. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frake, C. (1972). ‘Struck by speech’: The Yakan concept of litigation. In Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt. pp. 106–129.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuller, J. (2003). Use of the discourse marker like in interviews. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 7(3), pp. 365–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gal, S. and Irvine, J. (1995). The boundaries of language and disciplines: How ideologies construct differences. Social Research. 62, pp. 967–1001.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Signs of Difference: Language and Ideology in Social Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, R. (2001). When Listeners Talk. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilbert, K. and Matoesian, G. (2016). Multimodal action and speaker positioning in Closing Argument. In Multimodal Communication. Vol. 4(2), pp. 93–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glenn, P. (1989). Initiating shared laughter in multi-party conversations. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53: pp. 127–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Laughing at and laughing with: Negotiations of participants’ alignments through conversational laughter. In ten Have, P. and Psathas, G. (eds.) Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America. pp. 43–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gobet, F. (2016). Understanding Expertise. London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1979). Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. and McNeill, D. (1999). The role of gesture and mimetic representation in making language the province of speech. In M. Corballis and S. Lea (eds.), The Descent of Mind. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 155–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry 50, 3-4. 303–317.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1986). Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica. Vol. 62(1–2), pp. 29–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). Audience Diversity, Participation and Interpretation. Text, 6: pp. 283–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, pp. 1489–1522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Embodied hearers and speakers constructing talk and action in interaction. Cognitive Studies. 16(1), pp. 51–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M. (2004). Participation. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 222–244.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenbaum, T. (2000). Moderating Focus Groups. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gubrium, J. and Holstein, J. (2001). From the individual interview to the interview society. In Gubrium, J. and Holstein, H. (eds.) Handbook of Interview Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. pp. 3–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, W. (1996). Language and Communicative Practices. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Joint commitment and common ground in a ritual event. In Roots of Sociality. N. Enfield and S. Levinson (eds). New York: Berg. pp. 299–328.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (2018). The Impulse to Gesture. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haviland, J. (1996). Projections, Transpositions, and Relativity. In Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. (eds) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 271–323.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Pointing, gesture spaces and mental maps. In McNeill, D. (ed). Language and Gesture. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 13–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Hey! Topics in Cognitive Science. 7 pp. 124–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herbert, S. (2006). Citizens, Cops, and Power. Chicago: University of Chicago. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hester, S. and Housley, W. (2002). Introduction: Ethnomethodology and national identity. In Stephen Hester, S. and Housley, W. (eds.), Language, Interaction and National Identity. Burlington, VT: Ashgate. pp. 1–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hewitt, J. and Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers. American Sociological Review. 40, pp. 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, J. (1995). The Voices of Don Gabriel: Responsibility and Self in a Modern Mexicano Narrative. In Tedlock, D. and Mannheim, B. (eds) The Dialogic Emergence of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. pp. 97–147.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holstein, J. and J. Gubrium. (2004). Active interviewing. In Silverman, D. (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage. pp. 140–161.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holt, E. (2007). I’m eyeing your chop up mind”: Reporting and enacting. In E. Holt and R. Clift (eds). Reporting Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press. 47–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000). Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview: The Living Questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1975). Breakthrough into performance. In Ben-Amos, D. and Goldstein, K. (eds) Approaches to Semiotics [AS]: Folklore: Performance and Communication. Berlin/Boston, DE: De Gruter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing Statement. In T. Sebeok (ed.) Style in Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. pp. 398–429.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. (2009). Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In A. Jaffe (ed). Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 3–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds.) Structures of Social Action. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 346–369.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. (2016). Language theory in contemporary sociolinguistics. In Nikolas Coupland ed. Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press. 417–432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jung, H. (2017). Focus group interaction in evaluation research. Applied Linguistics Review 8 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karkkainen, E. (2007). The role of I guess in conversational stancetaking. In Stancetaking in Discourse ed by Robert Englebretson. 183–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (2013). Conversation analysis and interview studies. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (ed.) Chapelle, C. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1986). Some reasons for studying gesture. Semiotica 62, pp. 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). Do gestures communicate?: A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction 27: pp. 175–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Language and gesture: Unity or duality. In D. McNeill (ed). Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 47–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. and Moore, M. (1995). Underwriting the Risky Investment in Community Policing: What Social Science Should Be Doing to Evaluate Community Policing. The Justice System Journal, 17: pp. 271–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kishner, J. and Gibbs Jr., R. (1996). How ‘just’ gets its meanings: Polysemy and context in psychological semantics. Language and Speech 39: pp. 19–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S. (2003). Pointing: A foundational building block of human communication in S. Kita (ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet. (pp. 85–108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krahmer, E. and Swerts, M. (2007). The effects of visual beats on prosodic prominence: Acoustic analyses, auditory perception and visual perception. Journal of Memory and Language. 57, 396–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koven, M. (2014). Interviewing: Practice, ideology, genre, and intertextuality. Annual Review of Anthropology. Vol. 43, pp. 499–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kraska, P. and Cubellis, L. J. (1997). Militarizing Mayberry and beyond: Making sense of American paramilitary policing. Justice Quarterly 14, pp. 607–629. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. and Waletsky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4): pp. 3–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavin, D. and Maynard, D. (2001). Standardization vs. rapport: Respondent laughter and interviewer reaction during telephone surveys. American Sociological Review 66: pp. 453–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lawson, C. (2014). Situating police in a late modern society. The ontology of police Identity. Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles. 87 (4). pp. 270–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, D. (1987). The semantics of just . Journal of Pragmatics, 11: pp. 377–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Categories in the description of just . Lingua, 83: pp. 43–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J. (2010). Policing after 9/11: Community policing in an age of homeland security. Police Quarterly 13 (4): 347–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lempert, M. (2018). On the pragmatic poetic of prose: Gesture, parallelism, and politics. Signs and Society. Vol 6, 1, p. 120–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, G. (1987). Collaborative turn sequences: Sentence construction and social action. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. U. of California-Irvine.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society 20, pp. 441–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynch, M. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of priviledged knowledge. Theory, Culture, and Society. 17, 3. 26–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1982). Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor Ergo Sum? In Jarvella, R. J. and Klein, W. (eds.) Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics. Chinchester, New York: John Wiley. pp. 101–124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macnaghten, P. and Myers, G. (2004). Focus groups: The moderator’s view and the analyst’s view. In Qualitative Research Practice (eds.) Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. F. and Silverman, D. London: Sage, pp. 65–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maguire, E. and Wells, W. (2002). Community policing as communication reform. In Howard Giles (ed.) Law Enforcement, Communication, and Community. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 33–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mann, S. (2011). A critical review of qualitative interviews in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), pp. 6–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manning, P. (1988). Community policing as a drama of control. In Green, J. and Mastrofski, S. (eds.), Community Policing: Rhetoric or Reality. New York: Praeger. pp. 27–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maricchiolo, F., Gnisci, A., Bonaiuto, M. and Ficca, G. (2009). Effects of different types of hand gestures in persuasive speech on receivers’ evaluations. Language and Cognitive Processes. 24, 239–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matoesian, G. (1999). The grammaticalization of participant roles in the constitution of expert identity. Language in Society 28 (4): 491–521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Role Conflict as an Interactional Resource in the Multimodal Emergence of Expert Identity. Semiotica. 171, pp. 15–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, D. and Schaeffer, N. (2000). Sociology of social scientific knowledge: Survey research and ethnomethodology’s asymmetric alternates. Social Studies of Science. Vol. 30(3), pp. 323–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Gesture and communication. In K. Brown (ed) Encyclopedia of Linguistics (2nd edition). (pp 58–67). New York: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Gesture: A psycholinguistic approach. In Hogan, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 344–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2009). Like and other discourse markers. In P. Peters, P. Collins and A. Smith (eds). Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 317–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, D. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol 22, 129–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). The Focus Group Guidebook. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Basic and Advanced Focus Groups. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2008). What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In Metaphor and Gesture, Alan Cienki and Cornelia Müller (eds). Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 219–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mushin, I. (2001). Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, G. (1998). Displaying Opinions: Topics and Disagreement in Focus Groups. Language in Society, 27: pp. 85–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Functions of Reported Speech in Group Discussion. Applied Linguistics, 20: pp. 376–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Unspoken speech: Hypothetical reported discourse and the rhetoric of everyday talk. Text. 19 (4), pp. 571–590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Matters of Opinion: Talking About Public Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, G. and Lampropoulou, S. (2012). Impersonal you and stance-taking in social research interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 44: pp. 1206–1218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). What place reference can do in social research interviews. Discourse Studites 15, 3. 333–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, G. and Macnaghten, P. (1999). Can focus groups be analysed as talk? In. Barbour, R. and Kitzinger, J. (eds.) Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. London: Sage, pp. 173–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1996). Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In Gumperz, J. and Levinson, S. (eds.) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 407–437.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, E. and Capps, L. (2001). Living Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Overstreet, M. (1999). Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Overstreet, M. and Yule, G. (2002). The metapragmatics of and everything . Journal of Pragmatics, 34: pp. 785–794. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patton, M. (1987). How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potter, J. and Reicher, S. (1987). Discourses of community and conflict. British Journal of Social Psychology 26: pp. 25–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Puchta, C. and Potter, J. (2004). Focus Group Practice. London: Sage Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (2002). Ritual and Foreign Language Practices at School. Language in Society. 31: 491–525. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rapley, T. (2004). Interviews. In Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J., and Silverman, D. (eds.), Qualitative Research Practice (pp.15–34). London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romaine, S. and Lange, D. (1991). The Use of Like as a Marker of Reported Speech and Thought: A Case of Grammaticalization in Progress’. American Speech, 66: pp. 227–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D. (ed.) (1994). The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Evaluating multi-agency anti-crime partnerships: Theory, design, and measurement issues. In Evaluation for Crime Prevention: Crime prevention studies. Tilley, N. (ed.) Vol. 14, pp. 171–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D., Graziano, L., Stephens, C. and Schuck, A. (2011). Understanding Community policing and legitimacy-seeking behavior in virtual reality: A national study of municipal police websites. Police Quarterly 14 (1): 25–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roulston, K. (2006). Close encounters of the CA kind: A review of literature analyzing talk in research interviews. Qualitative Research 6 (4), pp 515–534. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Interview ‘problems” as topics for analysis. Applied Linguistics, 32 (1), pp. 77–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Introduction. In Interactional studies of Qualitative Research Interviews. (K. Roulston (ed). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 3–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1978). Technical considerations of a dirty joke. In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. J. Schenkein (ed). New York: Academic Press, pp. 249–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sauer, B. (2003). The Rhetoric of Risk: Technical Documentation in Hazardous Environments. Malwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheibman, J. (2004). Inclusive and exclusive patterning of the English first person plural: Evidence from conversation. In M. Achard and S. Kemmer (eds). Language, Culture, and Mind. Stanford: CSLI Publications. pp. 377–396.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Subjective and intersubjective uses of generalizations in English conversations. In Robert Englebretson, R. (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp. 111–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1988/9). From interview to confrontation: Observations on the Bush/Rather encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction. Vol. 22, pp. 215–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). “Narrative analysis: Thirty years later. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4): pp. 97–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. (1995). Intercultural Communication. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, I. (1999). Qualitative Evaluation. London: Sage Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shoaps, R. (1999). The Many Voices of Rush Limbaugh: The Use of Transposition in Constructing a Rhetoric of Common Sense. Text, 19: pp. 399–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, J. (2006). Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39: pp. 377–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Basso, K., Selby, H. (eds). Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: U. of New Mexico Press. p. 11–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Clyne, P., Hanks, W., and Hofbauer, C. (eds). The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society of the University of Chicago. pp. 193–247.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1981). The Limits of Awareness. Sociolinguistic Working Paper Number 84. Southwest Educational Development Lab., Austin, TX.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985). On the pragmatic “poetry” of prose: Parallelism, repetition, and cohesive structure in the time course of dyadic conversation. In D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications. Washington D.C: Georgetown University Press, 181–198.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Metapragmatic Discourse and the Metapragmatic Function. In J. Lucy (ed.) Reflexive Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 33–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). The Improvisational Performance of Culture in Realtime Discursive Practice. In Creativity in Performance, R. K. Sawyer (ed.). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. pp. 265–312.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Denotation and the pragmatics of language. In N. Enfield, P. Kockelman and J. Sidnell (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 128–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skarzynska, K. (2002). We and they in Polish political discourse. In Duszak, A. (ed.), Us and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. pp 249–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stephenson, B. (2015). Ritual: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford U. Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stasch, R. (2011). Ritual and Oratory Revisited: The Semiotics of Effective Action. Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 159–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stirling, L. and Manderson, L. (2011). About you: Empathy, objectivity and authority. Journal of Pragmatics 43: pp. 1581–1602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, T. and Sidnell, J. (2005). Introduction. Semiotica volume 156-1/4. 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, J. (1993). Gesture as communication I: Its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication Monographs 60: pp. 275–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). On projection. In Goody, E. (ed.), Social Intelligence and Interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 87–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Studdert, D. (2005). Conceptualizing Community: Beyond the State and Individual. New York: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, S. and Richards, K. (2011). Theorizing qualitative research interviews in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), pp. 1–5. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1989). Talking Voices. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tavarez, D. (2014). Ritual Language. In N. Enfield, P. Kockelman and J. Sidnell (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp 516–536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
TeBendorf, S. (2014). Pragmatic and Metaphoric – Combining Functional with Cognitive Approaches in the Analysis of the “Brushing Aside Gesture.” In Body – Language – Communication volume 2. C. Muller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill and J. Bressem (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 1540–1558.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tonnies, F. (2001). Community and Civil Society. New York: Cambridge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travers, M. (2005). Evaluation research and criminal justice: Beyond a political critique. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. Vol. 38(1), pp. 39–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsui, A. (1991). The pragmatic functions of I Don’t Know . Text, 11: pp. 607–622. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tutton, M. (2009). When in means into: Towards an understanding of boundary-crossing in . Journal of English Linguistics. 37: 5–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identity as an analysts’ and participants’ resource. In Charles Antaki, C. and Widdicombe, S. (eds.), Identities in Talk. London: Sage. pp. 191–206.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilce, J. (2017). Culture and Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. (1999). Focus groups: A feminist method. Psychology of Women Quarterly Vol. 23, pp. 181–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Focus group research. In Qualitative research: Theory, Method, and Practice. Silverman, D. (ed.) London: Sage Publications. pp. 177–199.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Analysing interaction in focus groups. In Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. Drew, P., Raymond, G. and Weinberg, D. (eds.), London: Sage Publications. pp. 50–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 44(1), pp. 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, R., Cillia, R., Reisig, M. and Liebhart, K. (1999). The Discursive Construction of National Identity. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wortham, S. (2001). Narratives in Action: A Strategy for Research and Analysis. New York, NY: Teachers Colleges Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue