Cover not available

In:The Language of Crisis: Metaphors, frames and discourses
Edited by Mimi Huang and Lise-Lotte Holmgreen
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 87] 2020
► pp. 87–107

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 3
Responding to organisational misbehaviour

The influence of public frames in social media

 | Aalborg University
Published online: 16 July 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.87.03hol
Abstract
Over the past decades, the seriousness with which organisational crises have developed has, in part, been contingent on public access to social media platforms. Analysing two Danish organisational crises, the chapter explores whether the conceptual repertoires that underlie public evaluation of organisational behaviour are embedded in shared social and cultural practices that allow them to be expressed and shared easily and intuitively. The findings suggest that by drawing on well-established experiential domains in social and cultural life, users in public social media may instantiate frames that inspire other users to follow suit. This may create dominant interpretations across platforms and lay the foundation of crisis development.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Framing and the relevance of metaphor to public social media action
    • 2.1Metaphor as framing
  • 3.Case studies and data retrieval
    • 3.1Data and their retrieval
  • 4.Framing the steakhouse
    • 4.1Two frames to discredit the steakhouse
  • 5.Framing the bank
    • 5.1One frame to discredit the bank
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (54)
References
Berlingske Tidende. 2014. “Nu boykotter 100.000 danskere bøf-gigant– kommentarer”, 22 September, available at: [URL]
Chilton, Paul A. 1996. Security Metaphors – Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coombs, W. Timothy. 2015. Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding, 4th Ed. Thousand Oaks/London: SageGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward a Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 41: 6–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan and Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics – An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Facebook on Nordjyske Stiftstidende. 2014. 19 September, available at: [URL]
Facebook on TV2 Nyhederne. 2014. 20 September, available at: [URL]
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairhurst, Gail. 2010. The Power of Framing: Creating the Language of Leadership. New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1975. “An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning.” Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of The Berkeley Linguistics Society, 123–31. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1982. “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, edited by Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–37. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gladwell, Malcolm. 2014. David & Goliat– Kunsten at kæmpe mod giganter [Translated from English: David and Goliath – Underdogs, misfits, and the art of battling giants]. Copenhagen: Lindhardt og Ringhof.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hallahan, Kirk. 1999. “Seven Models of Framing: Implications for Public Relations.” Journal of Public Relations Research 11 (3): 205–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heath, Robert L. 2010. “Crisis Communication: Defining the Beast and De-marginalizing Key Publics.” In The Handbook of Crisis Communication, edited by W. Timothy Coombs, and Sherry J. Holloday, 1–13. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing, Chichester. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hellsten, Iina, James Dawson, and Loet Leydesdorff. 2010. “Implicit Media Frames: Automated Analysis of Public Debate on Artificial Sweeteners.” Public Understanding of Science 19: 590–608. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmgreen, Lise-Lotte. 2012. “Framing a Bank: Reputation Management During Financial Crises.” In Metaphor and Mills: Figurative Language in Business and Economics, edited by Michael White and Honesto Herrera-Soler, 243–64. Berlin/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Why Am I to Blame When the Law Is on My Side?”: A Study of Crises, Public Opinion and Frames.” On the Horizon 23 (4): 363–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmgreen, Lise-Lotte, and Torben Vestergaard. 2009. “Evaluation and Audience Acceptance in Biotech News Texts.” Journal of Pragmatics, 41: 586–601. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnen, Marius, Marc Jungblut, and Marc Ziegele. 2018. “The Digital Outcry: What Incites Participation Behavior in an Online Firestorm.” New Media & Society 20 (9): 3140–3160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark, and George Lakoff. 2002. “Why Cognitive Linguistics Requires Embodied Realism.” Cognitive Linguistics 13 (3): 245–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kent, Michael L., and Maureen Taylor. 2016. “From Homo Economicus to Homo Dialogicus: Rethinking Social Media Use in CSR Communication.” Public Relations Review 42: 60–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltan. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Metaphor, Culture, and Discourse: The Pressure of Coherence.” In Metaphor and Discourse, edited by Andreas Musollf, and Jörg Zinken, 11–24. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Second edition. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor”. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, edited by Andrew Ortony, 202–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenges to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Metaphors We Live By. New edition with afterword. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, C., and J. Bernoff. 2008. Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Zongchao. 2016. “Psychological Empowerment on Social Media: Who Are the Empowered Users?” Public Relations Review 42: 49–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Brooke F. 2010. “Distinguishing How Elite Papers and A-list Blogs Cover Crises: Insights for Managing Crises Online.” Public Relations Review 36: 28–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Brooke F., Lucinda Austin, and Yan Jin. 2011. “How Publics Respond to Crisis Communication Strategies: The Interplay of Information Form and Source.” Public Relations Review. 37: 345–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas, and Jörg Zinken (eds.). 2009. Metaphor and Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muntinga, D. D., M. Moorman, and E. G. Smit. 2011. “Introducing COBRAs: Exploring Motivations for Brand-related Social Media Use.” International Journal of Advertising 30 (1): 13–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Politiken. 2012. ”Vrede over reklame: Hallo banktyper, tror I, vi har glemt, at I er überskurkene?”, 25 November, available at: [URL].
. 2014. ”Ekspert om Jensens Bøfhus-sagen: Det er blevet nemmere at kaste lidt op på sociale medier”, 22 September, available at: [URL]
Quinn, Naomie. 1991. “The Cultural Basis of Metaphor.” In Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology, edited by J. Fernandez, 56–93. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritchie, David. 2003. ““argument is war”– Or Is It a Game of Chess? Multiple Meanings in the Analysis of Implicit Metaphors.” Metaphor and Symbol 18 (2): 125–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romano, Manuela, and Maria Dolores Porto. 2016. Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rost, Katja, Lea Stahel, and Bruno S. Frey. 2016. “Digital Social Norm Enforcement: Online Firestorms in Social Media.” PLoS ONE 11 (6): e0155923. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saeby Avis. 2014. “Jensens Fiskerestaurant tabte sagen i Højesteret”, 19 September, available at: [URL]
Shao, Guosong. 2009. “Understanding the Appeal of User-generated Media: A Uses and Gratification Perspective.” Internet Research 19 (1): 7–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schultz, Friederike, Sonja Utz, and Anja Göritz. 2011. “Is the Medium the Message? Perceptions of and Reactions to Crisis Communication via Twitter, Blogs and Traditional Media.” Public Relations Review 37: 20–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schultz, Friederike, and Juliana Raupp. 2010. “The Social Construction of Crises in Governmental and Corporate Communications: An Inter-organizational and Inter-systemic Analysis.” Public Relations Review 36: 112–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Twitter 2014. 20 September, available at: Twitter.com, #boefhusgate.
Van der Meer, Toni G. L. A., and Piet Verhoeven. 2013. “Public Framing of Organizational Crisis Situations: Social Media versus News Media.” Public Relations Review 39: 229–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Meer, Toni G. L. A., Piet Verhoeven, Hans Beentjes, and Rens Vliegenthart. 2014. “When Frames Align: The Interplay between PR, News Media, and the Public in Times of Crisis.” Public Relations Review 40: 751–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2009. Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waymer, Damion, and Robert Heath. 2007. “Emergent Agents: The Forgotten Publics in Crisis Communication and Issues Management Research.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 35: 88–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfe, Richard, and Daniel S. Putler. 2002. “How Tight Are the Ties That Bind Stakeholder Groups?” Organization Science 13 (1): 64–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziem, Alexander. 2014. Frames of Understanding in Text and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Holmgreen, Lise-Lotte
2024. “We’re Not Proud of the Cases We’ve Been Involved in”: Crisis Resolution on Facebook Using Conversational Human Voice. International Journal of Business Communication 61:1 ► pp. 70 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue