In:Variation in Political Metaphor
Edited by Julien Perrez, Min Reuchamps and Paul H. Thibodeau
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 85] 2019
► pp. 107–130
Chapter 5Greek metaphors in the fiscal straightjacket
Published online: 6 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.85.05vog
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.85.05vog
Abstract
This paper examines the use of figurative language in the context of the Greek financial crisis during the period 2010–2011. In particular it examines the use of metaphor as a framing device (Camp 2015) in five speeches delivered by the Greek Prime Minister, George A. Papandreou. These speeches aimed to officially introduce to the public the collapse of the Greek economy, and most importantly, the change in the financial policies of the government which would be, or were, characterized by harsh economic measures such as job cuts, reduction of wages and pensions, as well as cuts on social spending. A close look at these speeches reveals extensive use of metaphoric language, with positively valenced metaphoric frames significantly outnumbering negative ones. The metaphoric language of the speeches appears in clusters and revolves mainly around three core themes: namely, the state of the economy, the process to improve it, and the role of the Greek people in this process. Variation in political metaphor is observed in these three themes and also in a case of a non-linguistic metaphor related to light. A fact that makes the use of metaphoric language of extreme interest in these speeches is that it is placed within a straightjacket, i.e. the fiscal straightjacket.
Keywords: metaphor, political speech, framing, valence, variation, financial crisis
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The fiscal straightjacket
- 3.Corpus and method
- 4.Quantitative analysis
- 5.Positive vs negative metaphoric frames
- 6.Comparison between positive and negative metaphoric frames
- 7.Qualitative analysis
- 8.Central themes and variation in political metaphor
- 8.1Variation in non-linguistic metaphor
- 9.Clusters of metaphoric frames
- 10.Discussion
- 11.Conclusion
Notes References Speeches
References (39)
Amadeo, K. (2018). Eurozone debt crisis: causes, cures and consequences [Blogpost](March 17). Retrieved from [URL]
Arrese, Á. & Vara-Miguel, A. (2016). A comparative study of metaphors in press reporting of the Euro crisis. Discourse & Society, 27 (2), 133–155.
Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A. & Steen, G. J. (2016). Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory, 26 (4), 410–430.
Cameron, L. & Low, G. (2004). Figurative variation in episodes of educational talk and text. European Journal of English Studies, 8 (3), 355–73.
Cameron L. & Stelma, J. (2004). Metaphor clusters in discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 (2), 107–136.
Camp, E. (2015). “Why metaphors make good insults: perspectives, presupposition, and pragmatics.” Philosophical Studies, 174 (1): 1–18.
Charteris-Black, J. & Musolff, A. (2003). “Battered hero’ or ‘innocent victim’? A comparative study of metaphors for euro trading in British and German financial reporting.” English for Specific Purposes, 22 (2), 153–176.
Cornelissen, J., Holt, R. & Zundel, M. (2011). The role of analogy and metaphor in the framing and legitimization of strategic change. Organization Studies, 32 (12), 1701–1716.
Cottarelli, C. (2012). Fiscal adjustment: Too much of a good thing? [Blog post] (January 29). Retrieved from [URL].
Creed, D. W. E., Langstraat J. A., & Scully, M. A. (2002). “A picture of the frame: Frame analysis as technique and as politics.” Organizational Research Methods 5: 34–55.
Fiscal policy. (2016). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2:39 pm, October 24, 2016, from [URL].
Johnson, J. T. & Taylor, S. E. (1981). The effect of metaphor on political attitudes. Basic and Applied Psychology, 2, 305–316.
Landau, M. J., Sullivan, D. & Greenberg, J. (2009). Evidence that self-relevant motivations and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social issues. Psychological Science, 20, 1421–1427.
Lizardo, O. (2012). The conceptual bases of metaphors of dirt and cleanliness in moral and non-moral reasoning. Cognitive Linguistics, 23 (2), 367–393. .
Lopez, A., Rojo, M. & Lliopis, M., & Orts, A. (2010). Metaphorical pattern analysis in financial texts: Framing the crisis in positive and negative metaphorical terms. Journal of pragmatics, 42, 3300–3313.
Magnay, D., McLaughlin, E., Naik, B. & Retiniotis, M. (2010). Greece Accept Bailout Package. (May, 2). Retrieved from [URL]
Mio, J. S. (1990). A thousand points of light and other misuses of metaphor. In Mio, J. S. (Chair), The Point of Figurative Language. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.
Ottatti, V., Renstrom, R. & Price, E. (2014). The metaphorical framing model: Political communication and public opinion. In Landau, M., Robinson, M. D. & Meier, B. P. (Eds), The Power of Metaphor: Examining its Influence on Social Life (pp. 179–202), Washington: American Psychological Association.
Paivio, A. (1979). Psychological processes in the comprehension of metaphor. In Ortony, A. Mark Landau, Michael. D. Robinson, and Brian P. Meier: (Ed), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 150–177), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T. & Steen, J. G. (2015). How viruses and beasts affect our opinions (or not): The role of extendedness in metaphorical framing. Metaphor and the Social World, 5 (2), 245–263.
Reuchamps, M., Dodeigne, J. & Perrez, J. (2018). Changing your political mind: The impact of a metaphor on citizens’ representations and preferences for federalism. Regional & Federal Studies, 28 (2), 151–175.
Scheufele, A. D. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3 (2–3), 297–316.
Scheufele, A. D. & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: the evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57 (1), 9–20.
Steen, J. G., Dorst, G. A., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T. & Pasma, T. (2010). A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins publishing company.
Steen J., G., Reijnierse, G. & Burgers, C. (2014). When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PLoS ONE, 9 (12).
Thibodeau, H. P. & Boroditsky, L. (2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8(1), .
Thompson, S. (1996). Politics without metaphors is like fish without water. In Mio, J. S. & Katz, A. N. (Eds), Metaphor: Implications and Applications (pp. 185–201), Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Opinions and ideologies in the press. In Bell, A. & Garrett, P. (Eds) Approaches to Media Discourses (pp. 21–63), Malden & Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
YPES. Υπουργείο εσωτερικών. Retrieved on 10:52 pm, January, 17 2018, from [URL]
Wallop, H. (2010). Greece: why did its economy fail so hard?” (April, 28). Retrieved from [URL]
PrimeMinisterGR. (2010a, April 23). Δήλωση Πρωθυπουργού από Καστελόριζο. Retrieved from [URL]
. (2010b, December 31). Μήνυμα του Πρωθυπουργού για το Νέο Έτος. Retrieved from [URL]
. (2011a, May 27). Δήλωση από Μέγαρο Μαξίμου. Retrieved from [URL]
. (2011b, June 10). Σας καλώ να δουλέψουμε μαζί. Retrieved from [URL]
. (2011c, June 15). Είναι ώρα ευθύνης. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.