In:Variation in Political Metaphor
Edited by Julien Perrez, Min Reuchamps and Paul H. Thibodeau
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 85] 2019
► pp. 35–60
Chapter 2Fairies, Christmas miracles and sham marriages
A diachronic analysis of deliberate metaphors in Belgian political discourse
Published online: 6 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.85.02hey
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.85.02hey
Abstract
This research analyzes the use of potentially deliberate metaphors in Belgian governmental policy statements over a time span of ten years. The analysis of this type of metaphor allows for further investigation into metaphor variation. Our results suggest that one variable that plays a role in the variation of political metaphors is the political situation of a country: the more hectic the political landscape, the more metaphor variation might occur. Throughout this chapter, some of the most striking potentially deliberate metaphors and tendencies are discussed, with the aim of establishing a possible explanation for what drives metaphorical variation in political discourse.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical framework: CDA, CMT and DMT as starting points for political metaphor analysis
- 3.Data and method
- 3.1Description of the corpus and political context
- 3.2Methodology: The identification of potentially deliberate metaphors
- 4.Findings: Diachronic perspective on the variation of potentially deliberate metaphors in Belgian politics
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Concluding remarks
Notes References
References (31)
Billig, M. & Macmillan, K. (2005). ‘Metaphor, Idiom and Ideology: The Search for “No Smoking Guns” across Time.’ Discourse and Society, 16 (4), 459–80.
Cameron, L. (2007). ‘Patterns of Metaphor Use in Reconciliation Talk.’ Discourse and Society, 18 (2), 197–222.
Carver, T. and Pikalo, J. (Eds.). (2008). Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In McHoul, A. & Rapley, M. (Eds.), How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods (pp. 25–38), London: Continuum.
Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1 (1), 26–52.
(2007). Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Gruber, H. (1993). Political language and textual vagueness. Pragmatics, 3 (1), 1–28.
Heyvaert, P., Dodeigne, J., Perrez, J. & Reuchamps, M. (submitted). Metaphors in spontaneous political communication: A case study of the use of deliberate metaphors in informal political interviews.” Journal of Language and Politics.
Koller, V. & Davidson, P. (2008). Social Exclusion as Conceptual and Grammatical Metaphor: A Cross-Genre Study of British Policy-Making. Discourse and Society, 19 (3), 307–331.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
La Chambre des Représentants de Belgique. URL: [URL]
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Musolff, A. (2012). The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9 (3), 301–310.
Nacey, S. (2013). Metaphors in Learner English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Perrez, J. & Reuchamps, M. (2014). Deliberate Metaphors in Political Discourse: The Case of Citizen Discourse. Metaphorik.de, 25, 7–41.
(2015). Special Issue on the Political Impact of Metaphors. Metaphor and the Social World, 5 (2), 165–76.
Perrez, J., Randour, F. & Reuchamps, M. (forthcoming). De l’uniformité du discours politique : analyse bibliométrique et linguistique de la catégorisation des discours politiques. CogniTextes.
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T. & Steen, G. J. (2018). DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics, 2 (2), 129–147.
Steen, G. J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model for metaphor. Metaphor & Symbol, 23, 213–241.
(2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor – Now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (1), 26–64.
(2015). Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72.
(2017). Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14 (1), 1–24.
Steen, G., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T. & Pasma, T. (2010). A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thibodeau, P. (2017). The function of metaphor framing, deliberate or otherwise, in a social world. Metaphor and the Social World, 7 (2), 270–290.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Shurma, Svitlana & Alla Golovnia
2025. The role of state rhetoric in the conceptualization of the COVID-19 pandemic. In COVID-19 [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 11], ► pp. 216 ff.
Xu, Yuting & Zaijiang Wei
Musolff, Andreas
2023. Culture-specific variation in interpretations of nations as
bodies metaphors by English and German L1 speakers. In Cultural Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 103], ► pp. 15 ff.
Steen, Gerard J.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
