In:Political Discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe
Edited by Martina Berrocal and Aleksandra Salamurović
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 84] 2019
► pp. 23–38
Chapter 2Diffuse messages as aggression and violence in political discourse
Published online: 23 July 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.84.02kus
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.84.02kus
Abstract
Diffuse messages are characterized by an unclear axiological and/or illocutionary orientation. If this diffuseness is used to mislead addressees and to domineer over someone by misleading him or her, then the diffuse message can be seen as an act of aggression and linguistic violence. Diffuse messages are a rhetorical practice which can often be observed in authoritarian and totalitarian contexts, where they are used to wield power over the interlocutor. Examples are given from Russian political discourse from the early periods of the Soviet Union up until now.
Article outline
- 1.A soft voice
- 2.A monument
- 3.Diffuseness and vagueness
- 4.Diffuseness in political rhetoric
- Lenin
- Stalin
- Brezhnev
- Putin
- 5.Conclusion
Note References
References (33)
Brezhnev, Leonid I.. 1970. “Rech’ na V. sezde Pol’skoy obedinennoy rabochey partii 12 noyabrya 1968 goda [Speech at the 5th Congress of the Polish United Workers’ Party on the 12th November 1968].” In Leninskim kursom [In Lenin’s Direction]. Vol. 2. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury: 324–336.
Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech. A Politics of the Performative. New York & London: Routledge.
Dönninghaus, Sabine. 1999. Sprache und Täuschung. Ein Beitrag zur lexikalischen Semantik des Russischen unter Berücksichtigung kognitionstheoretischer Überlegungen. [Language and Deception. A Contribution to Lexical Semantics of Russian, Taking into Account the Theory of Cognition.].” Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
. 2005. Die Vagheit der Sprache. Begriffsgeschichte und Funktionsbeschreibung anhand der tschechischen Wissenschaftssprache [Language Vagueness. The History and the Functional Description of the Term. The Case of the Czech Scientific Language].” Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Dymarsky, M. (ed). 2008. Rechevaya konfliktologiya. [Language of Conflictology]. St-Petersburg: RGPU im. Gertsena.
Gelber, Katharine. 2002. Speaking Back: The Free Speech Versus Hate Speech Debate. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gorham, Michael S. 2014. After Newspeak. Language Culture and Politics in Russia from Gorbachev to Putin. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Herz, Michael, and Peter Molnar (eds). 2012. The Content and Context of Hate Speech: Rethinking Regulation and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Köhnken, Günter, and Thomas Вliesener. 2002. “Psychologische Theorien zur Erklärung von Gewalt und Aggression [Psychological Theories on Violence and Aggression].” In Aggression und Gewalt [Aggression and Violence], ed. by Ostendorf, Heribert, and Günter Köhnken, and Gerd Schütze, 71–94. Frankfurt/М. et al.: Peter Lang..
Kuße, Holger. 1998. Konjunktionale Koordination in Predigten und politischen Reden. Dargestellt an Belegen aus dem Russischen. [Conjunctional Coordination in Sermons and Political Speeches. Examples from Russian]. München: Otto Sagner.
. 2005. “Im Krieg mit den Molchen: Stereotypen der Aggression bei Karel Čapek [In the War with the Newts: Stereotypes of Aggression in Karel Čapek’s Works].” In Stereotyp und Geschichtsmythos in Kunst und Sprache. Die Kultur Ostmitteleuropas in Beiträgen zur Potsdamer Tagung, 16.–18. Januar 2003 [Stereotypes and Historical Myths in Arts and Language].” The Culture of East-Central Europe in Papers of the Potsdam Conference, 16 – 18th of January 2003], ed. by Berwanger, Katrin, and Peter Kosta. Frankfurt/M. et al.: Peter Lang: 631–646.
. 2008. “Das Böse der positiven Rede. Ein Topos der Kommunikation in der russischen Kulturgeschichte (Avvakum, Fonvizin, Solov’ev) [The Evil in the Positive Speech. A Topos of Communication in Russian Cultural History (Avvakum, Fonvizin, Solovyev)].” In Das Böse in der russischen Kultur [The Evil in Russian Culture], ed. by Bodo Zelinsky, 44–59. Köln & Weimar & Wien: Böhlau.
. 2013. “Emotive Signs and Evaluation in Totalitarian Language: About “Vekhi” and Andrei Vyshinsky.” In Totalitarian Political Discourse? Tolerance and Intolerance in Eastern and East Central European Countries. Diachronic and Synchronic Aspects, ed. by Beatrix Kreß, 11–23. Frankfurt/M. et al.: Peter Lang.
. 2015. “Dostoevskij und die Sprache des Bösen.” [Dostoevsky and the Language of Evil]. In Wer wagt es solche Fragen vorzulegen? Dostojewskijs Weltanschauung. Jahrbuch der deutschen Dostojewskij-Gesellschaft. 21 [Who Dares to Ask Such Questions? The Weltanschauung of Dostoevsky. Yearbook of the Dostoevsky Society. 21], ed. by Gudrun Goes, 144–162. München & Berlin & Washington, DC: Otto Sagner.
Lenin, Vladimir I. l969a. “Tovarishchi-Rabochie! Idem v posledniy, rešitel’niy boy! [Comrade Workers, Forward To The Last, Decisive Fight!].” In Polnoe sobranie sochineny [Lenin’s Collected Works]. Vol. 37 (Iyul’ 1918–Mart 1919), 38–42. Moskva: Politizdat’.
1969b. “Obrashchenie k Krasnoy armii [An Appeal to the Red Army].” In Polnoe sobranie sochineny. Vol. 38 (Mart–Iyun’ 1919), 234–235. Moskva: Politizdat’.
1972. “An Appeal to the Red Army.” In Lenin’s Collected Works. Vol. 29. Moscow: Progress Publishers: 244–245.
. 1974. “Comrade Workers, Forward To The Last, Decisive Fight!” In Lenin’s Collected Works. Vol. 28, 54–58. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Pinkal, Manfred. 1995. Logic and Lexicon. The Semantics of the Indefinite. Dor-drecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.
Report. 1938: Report of court proceedings in the case of the anti-Soviet Bloc of Rights and Trotskyites: heard before the military collegium of the Supreme Court of the U.S.S.R.. Moscow, March 2–13, 1938. Moscow: People’s Commissariat of Justice of the U.S.S.R. Available at: [URL] [09/01/2010].
Ryazanova-Clark, Lara. 2016. “Linguistic Violence in Contemporary Russia Public Discourses.” Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61(1): 3–28.
Sharonov, I. A. (ed). 2004. Aggressiya v yazyke i rechi. Sbornik statey. [Aggression in Language and Speech. Collection of Articles]. Moskva: RGGU.
2012. Rechevaya aggressiya. Territoriya vrazhdy. [Aggression in Speech. The Territory of Hostility]. Moskva: Forum.
Stalin, Iosif V. 1949: “Politichesky otchet Central’nogo komitetą. 3 dekabrya. III: Partiya i oppozicyya [Political Report of the Central Committee].” In Sochineniya. Vol. 10 (Avgust–Dekabr’ 1927) [Works. Vol. 10 (August–December 1927)], 325–353. Moskva: Gospolitizdat’.
1954. “Political Report of the Central Committee. December 3. III: The Party and the Opposition.” In Works. Vol. 10 (August–December 1927), 333–361. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
Weiss, Daniel. 1986. “Was ist neu am „Newspeak”? Reflexionen zur Sprache und Politik in der Sowjetunion.” [“What is New in “Newspeak?” Reflexions on Language and Politics in Sovietunion”]. In Slavistische Linguistik 1985 [Slavic linguistics 1985], ed. by Renate Rathmayr. München: Otto Sagner: 247–325.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
