In:Imagining the Peoples of Europe: Populist discourses across the political spectrum
Edited by Jan Zienkowski and Ruth Breeze
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 83] 2019
► pp. 257–284
Get fulltext
Chapter 10“The people” in the discourse of the Romanian government and opposition
Between populism and the quest for democracy
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 13 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.83.11lev
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.83.11lev
Abstract
This article analyzes the discourse of the government and opposition parties in Romania, between 2011 and 2012. It examines the construction of “the people” as a popular subject, by applying both quantitative and qualitative analysis. The results show that the government tended to present “the people” as the only agents responsible for their material well-being, while denying the possibility for them to influence the decisions taken in the political sphere. In contrast, the opposition focused on the representation of the Romanian citizens as voters who have the democratic right to decide their rulers. The opposition parties attributed to the state the responsibility for general prosperity. The opposition constructs an extended chain of equivalences between the demands of various socio-professional categories forming “the people” and a marked dichotomy between “the people” and the governing elites, which are subsequently equated with the communist dictatorship.
Keywords: Romania, populism, Left, Right, inclusion, exclusion, liberalism, social democracy
Article outline
- Introduction
- Background to the case
- Data selection and methodology
- Discussion of the quantitative results
- Defining ‘the people’
- The cultural dimension of ‘the people’
- The material dimension
- The political dimension
- Defining political actors
- Conclusions
References
References (38)
Adevărul. 2010. 81% dintre români cred că țara merge într-o direcție greșită [81% of Romanians believe that the country is on the wrong track.], 21 December. [URL]
Associated Press. 2012. Protests Over Austerity Measures Turn Violent in Romania, 15 January. [URL]
Business Magazin. 2012. Cum a plecat guvernul Boc – de la A la Z [How the Boc government left – from A to Z.], 15 February. [URL]
De Cleen, Benjamin. 2018. “Populism and the discursive construction of ‘the people’: in defence of a discourse-theoretical perspective on populism as a political logic.” In Imagining the peoples of Europe: political discourse across the political spectrum, edited by Jan Zienkowski and Ruth Breeze, unknown. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
De la Torre, Carlos (ed.). 2015. The Promise and Perils of Populism. Global Perspectives. Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky.
DEX. 1998. Dicționarul explicativ al limbii române [Explanatory Dictionary of the Romanian Language], coordinated by Ion Coteanu, and Lucreția Mareș. Ediția a II-a. Academia Română. Institutul de Lingvistică ”Iorgu Iordan. București: Univers Enciclopedic.
Domnisoru, Ciprian. 2011. O retrospectivă a protestelor din 2011 în România. [A retrospective of the 2011 protests in Romania]. 21 December. [URL]
Duca, Bogdan. 2011. “Uniunea Social Liberală – partidul stângii românești?” [The Social-Liberal Union – the party of the Romanian left?]. Revista Cultura, 354, 15 December. [URL]
Filc, Dani. 2015. “Latin American inclusive and European exclusionary populism: colonialism as an explanation”. Journal of Political Ideologies, 20 (3): 263–283.
. 2011. “Post-populism: explaining neo-liberal populism through the habitus”. Journal of Political Ideologies, 16 (02): 221–238.
Freire, André. 2015. “Left-right ideology as a dimension of identification and of competition.” Journal of Political Ideologies, 20 (1): 43–68.
Georgescu, Dana. 2012. „
Uniunea Social-Liberală, ”coabitare mai veche”.” [The Social Liberal Union, an older cohabitation.], 5 February. [URL]
Hanley, Seán, and Allan Sikk. 2016. Economy, corruption or floating voters? Explaining the breakthroughs of anti-establishment reform parties in eastern Europe. Party Politics 22 (4): 522–533.
Ibenskas, Raimondas, and Allan Sikk. 2017. Patterns of party change in Central and Eastern Europe, 1990-2015. Party Politics 23 (1): 43–54.
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vit Baisa, Jan Bǔsta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovvář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vit Suchomel. 2014. The Sketch Engine: ten years on. Lexicography 1: 7–36.
. 2005b. “Populism: What’s in a Name?” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, edited by Francisco Panizza: 32–49. London: Verso.
Maeda, Ko. 2015. Determinants of opposition fragmentation: Parliamentary rules and opposition strategies. Party Politics 2(2): 763–774.
Marian, Simion Florea. 2000. Înmormântarea la români [The Burial at the Romanians]. Edition, introduction, bibliography and glossary by Iordan Datcu. București: Saeculum I.O.
McAllister, Ian, and Stephen White. 2007. “Political parties and democratic consolidation in post-communist societies.” Party Politics 13 (2): 197–216.
Mudde, Cas. 2015. “Conclusion: Some Further Thoughts on Populism”. In The Promise and Perils of Populism. Global Perspectives, edited by Carlos de la Torre: 431–452. Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky.
Ochoa Espejo, Paulina. 2015. “Power to Whom? The People between Procedure and Populism.” In The Promise and Perils of Populism. Global Perspectives, edited by Carlos de la Torre: 59–90. Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky.
Rancière, Jacques. 2016. “The Populism That Is Not To Be Found”. In What Is a People? by Alain Badiou et al..: 101–105. New York: Columbia University Press.
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2015. “Populism, Political Mobilizations and Crises of Political Representation”. In The Promise and Perils of Populism. Global Perspectives, edited by Carlos de la Torre: 140–158. Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky.
Rychlý, Pavel. 2008. A Lexicographer-Friendly Association Score. Proc.2nd Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Languages Processing RASLAN 2: 6–9.
Stan, Lavinia. 2013. “Romanian Politics in 2012: Intra-Cabinet Coexistence and Political Instability.” South-East European Journal of Political Studies, I (3): 12–26.
Stavrakakis, Yannis, and Giorgios Katsambekis. 2014. “Left-wing populism in the European periphery: the case of SYRIZA”. Journal of Political Ideologies 19 (2): 119–142.
Stenogram of the Senate session (7 February, 2011). [URL]
Stenogram of the common session of the Parliament (16 March, 2011). [URL]
(23 January, 2012). [URL]
Șomănescu, Mihai. 12 January, 2017. Cinci ani de la protestele anti-Băsescu din 2012: cele mai violente mișcări de stradă de la mineriade încoace. Cronologia unui război intern [Five years since the protests against Băsescu in 2012: the most violent street manifestations since the miners’ protests. The chronology of an internal war.]. [URL]
Van Der Valk, Ineke. 2003. “Right-Wing Parliamentary Discourse on Immigration in France”. Discourse & Society 14 (3): 309–348.
White, Jonathan. 2011. “Left and Right as political resources”. Journal of Political Ideologies 16 (2): 123–144.
