Cover not available

In:Imagining the Peoples of Europe: Populist discourses across the political spectrum
Edited by Jan Zienkowski and Ruth Breeze
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 83] 2019
► pp. 73–100

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Chapter EPUB

Chapter 3
European populism(s) as a counter-hegemonic discourse?

The rise of Podemos and M5S in the wake of the crisis

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 13 August 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.83.04bor
Abstract
In this chapter, we compare the discourse of Podemos and Movimento Cinque Stelle in order to answer the following question: to what extent do these movements pertain to the same political phenomenon? Based on Laclau’s definition of populism, we provide a “snapshot” of both parties’ discourse between 2012 and 2016 by carrying out a corpus-based analysis that combines lexicography and metaphor analysis. The results show that they display a populist logic and represent two counter-discourses against neoliberal hegemony. However, they also display important differences that could prove to be decisive when it comes to seizing political power and building an alternative to the hegemonic order they challenge, as their recent evolutions have shown.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Populism as a reaction against the hegemonic order in a context of crisis
    • Populism as a political logic
    • Populism against neoliberal hegemony in times of austerity: “Re-politicizing” and “Re-nationalizing” politics
  • Corpus and methods
  • Similarities between Podemos and M5S’: Two populist counter-discourses against neoliberal hegemony
  • Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (51)
References
Albertazzi, Daniele and Duncan McDonnell. 2015. Populists in Power. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickerton, Christopher. 2012. European Integration: From Nation-States to Member States. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickerton, Christopher and Carlo Invernizzi-Accetti. 2014. “Democracy Without Parties? Italy After Berlusconi”. The Political Quarterly 85(1): 23–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark and Richard S. Katz. 2005. “From Catch-All Politics to Cartelization: The Political Economy of the Cartel Party.” West European Politics 28: 33–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borriello, Arthur. 2017. “’There is no Alternative’: How Italian and Spanish Leaders’ Discourse Obscured the Political Nature of Austerity”. Discourse & Society. Published Online 28 (3): 241–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “La vertu du sacrifice collectif. Antagonisme et valeurs morales dans le discours d’austérité en Italie et en Espagne Durant la crise de la zone euro (2010-2013).” Langage et société 166: 75–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret. 1999. “Trust the People ! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy” Political Studies 47(1): 2–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2000. “Metaphor and Vocabulary Teaching in ESP Economics.” English for Specific Purposes 19(2): 149–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2004. Post-democracy. Cambridge: PolityGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neo-Liberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Prat, Cesareo R.-A. 2015. “Semejanzas y diferencias entre el Movimento 5 stelle y Podemos [Similarities and differences between the Five Star Movement and Podemos].” Società Mutamento Politica. Rivista italiana di sociologia 6(11): 51–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Della Sala, Vincenzo. 1997. “Hollowing out and Hardening the State: European Integration and the Italian Economy.” West European Politics 20(1): 14–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer: 121–138. London: SAGE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Language and Globalization. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gauthier, Gilles. 1994. “La métaphore guerrière dans la communication politique [The war metaphor in political communication].” Recherches en communication 1: 131–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerbaudo, Paolo. 2017. The Mask and the Flag. Populism, Citiznism and Global Protest. London: Hurst and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason and David Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartleb, Florian. 2015. “Here to Stay: Anti-Establishment Parties in Europe.” European View 14(1): 39–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howarth, David. 2000. Discourse. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iglesias, Pablo. 2015. Politics in a Time of Crisis. Podemos and the Future of a Democratic Europe. London & New York: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kioupkiolis, Alexandros. 2016. “Podemos: the Ambiguous Promises of Left-Wing Populism in Contemporary Spain.” Journal of Political Ideologies 21(2): 99–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knight, Daniel M. and Charles Stewart. 2016. “Ethnographies of Austerity: Temporality, Crisis and Affect in Southern Europe.” History and Anthropology 27(1): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2004. “The Populist Challenge.” West European Politics 37(2): 361–378. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Takis S. Pappas (eds). 2015. European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1990. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchart, Oliver. 2007. Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2013. Ruling the Void : The Hollowing-Out of Western Democracy. London : Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzolini, Samuele, and Arthur Borriello. 2017. “Southern European Populisms as Counter-Hegemonic Discourses? Podemos and M5S in Comparative Perspective.” In Podemos and the New Political Cycle, ed. by Marco Briziarelli and Oscar Garcia Agustin: 227–254. Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mény, Yves and Yves Surel. 2002. “The Constitutive Ambiguity of Populism” In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, ed. by Yves Mény, and Yves Surel: 1–21. Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2015. “How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism.” Government and Opposition 50(2): 189–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 1998. “The Radical Centre. A Politics without Adversary” Soundings 9: 11–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. On the Political. London and New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39(4): 542–563. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muñoz, Jordi and Jacques Fontaine. 2016. “De l’hypothèse populiste à la nouvelle gauche. Origine et bases électorales de Podemos.” Pôle Sud 45: 43–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nerghes, Adina, and al. 2015. “A Toxic Crisis: Metaphorizing the Financial Crisis.” International Journal of Communication 9: 106–132.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prentoulis, Marina and Lasse Thomassen. 2013. “Political Theory in the Square: Protest, Representation and Subjectification.” Contemporary Political Theory. 12(3): 166–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. 2005. La haine de la démocratie. Paris: La Fabrique. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roux, Christophe. 2016. “Partis émergents en Europe du Sud. Une introduction compare.” Pôle Sud 45: 5–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semenzin, Silvia. 2015. “La comunicación política en tiempos de crisis: una comparación entre Italia y España [Political communication in times of crisis: a comparison between Italy and Spain].” Documentación de las Ciencias de la Información 38: 83–102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sommerer, Erwan. 2005. “L’école d’Essex et la théorie politique du discours: une lecture “post-marxiste” de Foucault [The Essex school and the political theory of discourse: a “post-Marxist” reading of Foucault].” Raisons Politiques 19: 193–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis and al. 2016. “A New Populism Index at Work: Identifying Populist Candidates and Parties in the Contemporary Greek Context.” European Politics and Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Straehle, Carolyn, and al. 1999. “Struggle as metaphor in European Union discourses on unemployment.” Discourse & Society 10(1): 67–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torfing, Jacob and David Howarth (eds). 2005. Discourse Theory in European Politics. Identity, Policy and Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaara, Eero. 2014. “Struggles over Legitimacy in the Eurozone Crisis: Discursive Legitimation Strategies and their Ideological Underpinnings.” Discourse & Society 25(4): 500–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vittori, Davide. 2017. “Podemos and the Five-star Movement: populist, nationalist or what?” Contemporary Italian Politics 9(2): 142–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, Michael. 2003. “Metaphor and economics: The case of growth.” English for Specific Purposes 22(2): 131–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and al. (eds). 2013. Right-Wing Populism in Europe. Politics and Discourse. London and New York: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Melito, Francesco
2025. Hegemonic struggles and the role of contemporary ‘organic intellectuals’: A different perspective for the analysis of discourses. Politics 45:3 ► pp. 458 ff. DOI logo
Tarazona Vento, Amparo
2025. Megaprojects in austerity times: Populism, politicisation, and the breaking of the neoliberal consensus. Urban Studies 62:1 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Serafis, Dimitris, E. Dimitris Kitis & Stavros Assimakopoulos
2022. Sailing toIthaka. Journal of Language and Politics 21:2 ► pp. 344 ff. DOI logo
Bickerton, Christopher J. & Carlo Invernizzi Accetti
2021. Technopopulism, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue