In:Metaphor, Nation and Discourse
Edited by Ljiljana Šarić and Mateusz-Milan Stanojević
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 82] 2019
► pp. 227–258
Chapter 9The role of metonymy and metaphor in the conceptualization of the nation
An emergent ontological analysis of syntactic-semantic constructions
Published online: 20 May 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.82.10per
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.82.10per
Abstract
This corpus-based study presents an emergent ontological analysis of syntactic-semantic constructions of the concept nation. Using large Croatian corpora, I analysed the ontological congruence of the collocations of the lexeme nacija ‘nation’ in five types of syntactic-semantic constructions. This approach enabled a formal hierarchical description of the metaphorical conceptualization of the nation and the cognitive mechanism of eliciting reification, personification and social appraisal of the nation. Metaphorical mappings are seen as a powerful instrument for conceptualizing the institutional status of the nation, reinforcing the interaction between members, and the creation of collective identity that influences a person’s self-appraisal, and vice versa.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction and approaches
- 2.What kind of entity is the nation?
- 2.1The emergent constructivist approach to the ontology of the nation
- 2.2Emergent ontological description as an iterative function of meronomy and classification
- 2.3Cultural models of the nation
- 2.4The diachronic aspect of the componential analysis
- 2.5Language as a tool of conceptual construal
- 3.Analysis of syntactic-semantic constructions
- 3.1 Syntactic-semantic constructions and construal of meaning
- 3.2Noun collocates of the coordinated construction
- 3.3Adjective collocates of the adjective modifier construction
- 3.4Noun collocates of the dependent genitive construction
- 3.5Verb collocates of the thematic object construction
- 3.6Verb collocates of the agentive subject construction
- 4.Ontological congruence analysis of categorization, metonymy, and metaphor
- 4.1Cognitive profiling of meronomic relations in syntactic-semantic constructions
- 4.1.1Meronymy in the adjective modifier construction
- 4.1.2Meronymy in the genitive construction
- 4.1.3Meronymy in the thematic object construction
- 4.1.4Meronymy in the agentive subject construction
- 4.2Metaphor as incongruent profiling of extended meronomic relations
- 4.3Pragmatic relevance of metaphors in discourse
- 4.1Cognitive profiling of meronomic relations in syntactic-semantic constructions
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgment Notes References
References (51)
Barcelona, Antonio. 2000. “On the Plausibility of Claiming a Metonymic Motivation for Conceptual Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, ed. by Antonio Barcelona, 93–108. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bennardo, Giovanni, and Victor C. De Munck. 2014. Cultural Models: Genesis, Typology and Experiences. New York: Oxford University Press.
Borghi, Anna M., and Ferdinand Binkofski. 2014. Words as Social Tools: An Embodied View on Abstract Concepts. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Brdar, Mario. 2007. Metonymy in Grammar: Towards Motivating Extensions of Grammatical Categories and Constructions. Osijek: Faculty of Philosophy.
Brin, Sergey and Lawrence Page. 1998. “The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine.” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30(1–7): 107–117.
Buccino, Giovanni, Ivan Colagè, Nicola Gobbi, and Giorgio Bonaccorso. 2016. “Grounding Meaning in Experience: A Broad Perspective on Embodied Language.” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 69: 69–78.
Capra, Fritjof. 1997. The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. New York: Anchor Books.
Capra, Fritjof, and Piero Luisi. 2014. The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2013. Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Palgrave: Macmillan.
Chiao, Joan Y., and Katherine D. Blizinsky. 2016. “Cultural Neuroscience: Bridging Cultural and Biological Sciences.” In Social Neuroscience: Biological Approaches to Social Psychology, ed. by Eddie Harmon-Jones, and Michael Inzlicht, 247–275. New York: Routledge.
Chow, Ho Ming, Raymond A. Mar, Yisheng Xu, Siyuan Liu, Suraji Wagage, and Allen R. Braun. 2014. “Embodied Comprehension of Stories: Interactions between Language Regions and Modality-specific Neural Systems.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26 (2): 279–295.
D’Andrade, Roy. 1987. “A Folk Model of the Mind.” In Cultural Models in Language and Thought, ed. by Dorothy Holland, and Naomi Quinn, 112–151. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, Nick C., and Diane Larsen-Freeman. 2009. Language as a Complex Adaptive System. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley–Blackwell.
Ellis, Nick C., Matthew Brook O’Donnell, and Ute Römer. 2015. “Usage-Based Language Learning.” In The Handbook of Language Emergence, ed. by Brian MacWhinney, and William O’Grady, 163–180. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley–Blackwell.
Emmeche, Claus, Simo Køppe, and Frederik Stjernfelt. 1997. “Explaining Emergence: Towards an Ontology of Levels.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28 (1): 83–117.
Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E. Taylor. 2013. Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. London: Sage Publications.
Gibbs, W. Raymond. 2017. Metaphor Wars: Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gildea, Daniel, and David Temperley. 2010. “Do Grammars Minimize Dependency Length?” Cognitive Science 34 (2): 286–310.
Hogan, Patrick Colm. 2009. Understanding Nationalism: On Narrative, Cognitive Science, and Identity. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
James, Paul. 1996. Nation Formation: Towards a Theory of Abstract Community. London: Sage Publications.
Kolstø, Pål. 2000. Political Construction Sites. Nation-Building in Russia and the Post-Soviet States. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980/2003. Metaphors We Live By, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ljubešić, Nikola, and Tomaž Erjavec. 2011. “hrWaC and slWac: Compiling Web Corpora for Croatian and Slovene.” In Text, Speech and Dialogue 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. by Ivan Habernal, and Václav Matoušek, 395–402. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Máiz, Ramón. 2003. “Framing the Nation: Three Rival Versions of Contemporary Nationalist Ideology.” Journal of Political Ideologies 8 (3): 251–267.
Moussaïd, Mehdi, Juliane E. Kämmer, Pantelis P. Analytis, and Hansjörg Neth. 2013. “Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation.” PLoS ONE 8 (11): e78433.
Mumenthaler, Christian, and David Sander. 2012. “Social Appraisal Influences Recognition of Emotions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102 (6): 1118–1135.
Musolff, Andreas. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Nardon, Luciara, and Richard M. Steers. 2009. “The Culture Theory Jungle: Divergence and Convergence in Models of National Culture.” In Cambridge Handbook of Culture, Organizations, and Work, ed. by Rabi S. Bhagat, and Richard M. Steers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pavlaković, Vjeran, and Benedikt Perak. 2017. “How Does this Monument Make You Feel?: Measuring Emotional Responses to War Memorials in Croatia.” In The Twentieth Century in European Memory: Transcultural Mediation and Reception, ed. by Barbara Törnquist-Plewa, and Tea Sindbak Andersen. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Perak, Benedikt. 2017. “Pojmovne mreže leksema neugodnih i nepobuđenih emocija. Usporedba pojmova tuga, jad, žalost, depresija i sjeta u koordiniranoj konstrukciji [Conceptual Networks of Lexemes Referring to Hedonic Negative and Low Arousal Emotion Concepts: Comparison of the Croatian Lexemes Sadness, Depression, Sorrow, Grief and Melancholy in Coordinated Constructions].” In Jezik kao predmet proučavanja i jezik kao predmet poučavanja, ed. by Diana Stolac, and Anastazija Vlastelić, 297–317. Zagreb: Srednja Europa.
Perak, Benedikt, and Sanja Puljar D’Alessio. 2013. “Kultura kao emergentno svojstvo otjelovljene spoznaje [Culture as an Emergent Property of Embodied Cognition].” In Avanture kulture: kulturalni studiji u lokalnom kontekstu, ed. by Nenad Fanuko, and Sanja Puljar D’Alessio, 77–108. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.
Radden, Günter. 2000. “How Metonymic are Metaphors?” In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, ed. by Antonio Barcelona, 93–108. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Richerson, Peter J., and Robert Boyd. 2005. Not by Genes Alone. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rokkan, Stein. 1975. “Dimensions of State Formation and Nation-Building. A Possible Paradigm for Research on Variations within Europe.” In The Formation of National States in Western Europe, ed. by Charles Tilly, 562–600. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rychlý, Pavel, and Adam Kilgarriff. 2007. “An Efficient Algorithm for Building a Distributional Thesaurus (and other Sketch Engine Developments).” In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the ACL on Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions, 41–44. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2010. “Does Frequency in Text Instantiate Entrenchment in the Cognitive System?” In Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-Driven Approaches, ed. by Dylan Glynn, and Kerstin Fischer, 101–133. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Searle, John. 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Simon, Patrick, Victor Piché, and Amélie A. Gagnon. 2015. Social Statistics and Ethnic Diversity: Cross-National Perspectives in Classifications and Identity Politics. New York: Springer International Publishing.
Smith, Eliot R., and Frederica R. Conrey. 2007. “Agent-Based Modeling: A New Approach for Theory Building in Social Psychology.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 11 (1): 87–104.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Susanne Flach. 2016. “The Corpus-Based Perspective on Entrenchment.” In Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning: How We Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge, ed. by Hans-Jörg Schmid, 101–128. Washington, DC: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tomasello, Michael. 2000. “First Steps toward a Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition.” Cognitive Linguistics 11 (1–2): 61–82.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Wang, Yongqi & Yujie Xie
Perak, Benedikt & Tajana Ban Kirigin
Ban Kirigin, Tajana & Benedikt Perak
Salamurović, Aleksandra
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
