Cover not available

In:Metaphor, Nation and Discourse
Edited by Ljiljana Šarić and Mateusz-Milan Stanojević
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 82] 2019
► pp. 201–224

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 8
“The state of our Union is strong.” Metaphors of the nation in State of the Union addresses

 | University of Turin
Published online: 20 May 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.82.09dem
Abstract
This chapter discusses the metaphors of the nation used by the last four US presidents (Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump) in their annual State of the Union addresses. It is argued that the two main metaphors of the nation used by the presidents, a nation is a building and a nation is a person, are key discursive elements which define the essential ideological characteristics of the nation and constitute a hegemonic concept of national identity. The chapter explains elements of continuity and variation in these metaphorical images in the presidential addresses in terms of the ritual nature of the address and the genre theory of the “New Rhetorics.”
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1The SOTU address and genre
    • 2.2Nation and metaphor
  • 3.Metaphors of the nation in Clinton, Bush, Obama and Trump
    • 3.1Methodology
    • 3.2Build
    • 3.3America, nation, our country
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (44)
References
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities. 2nd ed. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayley, Paul, and Cinzia Bevitori. 2015. “Two Centuries of ‘Security’: Semantic Variation in the State of the Union Address (1790–2014).” In Gentle Obsessions: Literature, Linguistics and Learning in Honour of John Morley, ed. by Alison Duguid, Anna Marchi, Alan Partington, and Charlotte Taylor, 60–80. Roma: Artemide.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beard, Charles A. 1935. American Government and Politics, 7th ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1995. Banal Nationalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bougher, Lori D. 2012. “The Case for Metaphor in Political Reasoning and Cognition.” Political Psychology 33 (1): 145–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, David. 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 1990. Deeds Done in Words: Presidential Rhetoric and the Genres of Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey E. 1995. “Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 87–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. “Presidential Leadership of the Public Agenda.” Paper prepared for presentation at the 2014 meeting of the American Political Science Association. Accessed 20 February 2017. [URL]
Corpling server. [URL]
Dobbins, James. 2003. “Nation-Building: The Inescapable Responsibility of the World’s Only Superpower.” RAND Review, Summer 2003. Accessed 20 February 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. 1996. “Presidential Rhetoric: What Difference does it Make?” In Beyond the Rhetorical Presidency, ed. by Martin J. Medhurst, 199–217. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Language and Power, 2nd ed. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 2006. Nations and Nationalism. 2nd ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goatly, Andrew. 1997. The Language of Metaphors. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kovács, Éva. 2011. “The Traditional vs. Cognitive Approach to English Phrasal Verbs.” Publicationes Universitatis Miskolcinensis. Sectio Philosophica 16 (1): 141–160.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1991. “Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf.” Public paper, 30 January 1991, University of California at Berkeley. Accessed 12 August 2016. [URL]
. 1996. Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Metaphor and War, Again.” Alternet, 17 March 2003. Accessed 12 August 2016. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster. 2018. [URL]
Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. “Rhetorical Community: The Cultural Basis of Genre.” In Genre and the New Rhetoric, ed. by Aviva Friedman, and Peter Medway, 67–78. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust: The Concept of the Body Politic. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 9 (3): 301–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ng, Sik Hung, and James J. Bradac. 1993. Power in Language. Verbal Communication and Social Influence. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, Gerhard. 2017. “State of the Union Addresses and Messages.” The American Presidency Project. Accessed 1 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossiter, Clinton. 1956. The American Presidency. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shogan, Colleen J. 2015. “The President’s State of the Union Address: Tradition, Function, and Policy Implications.” Congressional Research Service. Accessed 10 January 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1998. Nationalism and Modernism. A Critical Survey of Recent Theories of Nations and Nationalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stephenson, Carolyn. 2005. “Nation Building.” Beyond Intractability, January 2005. Accessed 25 March 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šarić, Ljiljana. 2015. “Metaphors in the Discourse of the National.” Družboslovne Razprave 31 (80): 47–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teten, Ryan L. 2003. “Evolution of the Modern Rhetorical Presidency: Presidential Presentation and Development of the State of the Union Address.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 33 (2): 333–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. 1990. Ideology and Modern Culture. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walter, Jochen, and Jan Helmig. 2008. “Discursive Metaphor Analysis: (De)construction(s) of Europe.” In Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World, ed. by Terrell Carver, and Jernej Pikalo, 119–131. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Martin Reisigl. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Hunt, Sally
2021. COVID and the South African Family: Cyril Ramaphosa, President or father?. Discourse, Context & Media 44 ► pp. 100541 ff. DOI logo
Salamurović, Aleksandra
2020. Metonymy and the conceptualisation of nation in political discourse. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 8:1 ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue