In:Metaphor, Nation and Discourse
Edited by Ljiljana Šarić and Mateusz-Milan Stanojević
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 82] 2019
► pp. 127–154
Chapter 5Metaphors for language contact and change
Croatian language and national identity
Published online: 20 May 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.82.06cic
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.82.06cic
Abstract
This chapter analyses the discursive construction of Croatian language identity and demonstrates that figurative language plays a crucial role in the process of national and linguistic (dis)identification. The ideological nature and complexity of nations and languages make both concepts highly susceptible to figuration. Based on an analysis of ninety-seven sociolinguistic texts authored by influential social actors, published from 1995 up to the present day, I propose a schematic scenario – an unacceptable language phenomenon is a danger to the nation – that both underlies puristic language ideology and indirectly sustains the status of the Croatian language as a national emblem. Conceptualizations of language contact and change in terms of drowning, colonization, illness, and poisoning constitute the core of the metaphor-based scenario, discursively construing danger to the language and nation.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 2.1Language – constructing and delineating nations
- 2.2Croatian extra-linguistic context
- 2.3Discourse, metaphor, blending, and scenarios
- 3.Method and data
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Undesirable elements taint and corrupt language
- 4.2The nation is affected by linguistic changes
- 4.3Language requires purification
- 4.4Language needs protection
- 5.Construction of identity through discourse and implications of metaphorical language for language users
- 6.Conclusion
Notes References
References (36)
Primary sources
Babić, Stjepan. 2004. Hrvanja hrvatskoga: hrvatski u koštacu sa srpskim i klinču s engleskim [The Wrestlings of Croatian: Croatian in the Grip of Serbian and in the Grasp of English]. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
Bagdasarov, Artur. 2011. “Treba li Hrvatskoj druga Deklaracija o položaju hrvatskog jezika? [Does Croatia need another Declaration on the Status of the Croatian Language?].” Vijenac 453. Matica hrvatska. [URL] (Accessed 16 May 2016)
. 2012. “Goldsteinova jezično-pravopisna mutacija [Goldstein’s Linguistic and Orthographic Mutation].” Portal Hrvatskoga kulturnog vijeća. [URL] (Accessed 15 May 2016).
. 2013. “Hrvatski jezik je najveća svetinja hrvatskog naroda [The Croatian Language is the Greatest Sanctity of the Croatian Nation].” Vijenac 496. Matica hrvatska. [URL] (Accessed 17 March 2016).
Čatić, Igor. 2015. “Je suis Jezik.” Hrvatski fokus. [URL] (Accessed 15 June 2016).
Glas Koncila. 2013. Jezik – kolijevka narodnog identiteta [Language – the Cradle of National Identity]. [URL] (Accessed 15 May 2016).
Hrvatski jezični portal [The Croatian Language Portal]. Znanje d.o.o. & Srce. Continually updated at: [URL]
Jezici i nacionalizmi [Language and Nationalisms]. n.d. (website). [URL] (Accessed 9 June 2017).
Lucić, Predrag. 1995. “Dossier: Govorite li hrvatski i dokle? Silovanje jezika [Dossier: Do you Speak Croatian and to what Extent? Language Rape].” Feral Tribune (sourced from the author’s personal archive).
. 2005. “Mali jezikoslovni rječnik [Small Glossary of Linguistics].” Sarajevske Sveske 10. [URL] (Accessed 8 April 2016).
Lučić, Radovan. 2007. “Uvest ću još koju riječ i ozdravit će duša tvoja! [I Shall Introduce a Couple of other Words and your Soul will be Healed!].” In Jezik i identiteti [Language and Identities: Proceedings], ed. by Jagoda Granić, 337–347. Zagreb/Split: Hrvatsko društvo za primijenjenu lingvistiku.
Secondary sources
Absillis, Kevin, and Jürgen Jaspers. 2016. “Beware of the Weeds: Understanding Flemish Linguistic Purism as a Utopian Discourse.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2016 (262): 1–24.
Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, revised ed. London: Verso.
Bermel, Neil. 2006. “Metaphors and the Conceptualization of Language.” In Linguistic Authority, Language Ideology, and Metaphor. 262–300. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Blommaert, Jan. 2006. “Language Policy and National Identity.” In An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method, ed. by Ricento Thomas, 238–254. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2011. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor, 2nd edition. Houndmills/Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Douglas, Mary. 1970. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London/Reading/Fakenham: Penguin Books.
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2003. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Greenberg, Robert D. 2008. Language and Identity in the Balkans: Serbo-Croatian and its Disintegration, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hosokawa, Naoko. 2015. “Nationalism and Linguistic Purism in Contemporary Japan: National Sentiment Expressed through Public Attitudes towards Foreignisms.” Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 15 (1): 48–65.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Langston, Keith, and Anita Peti-Stantić. 2011. “A Language Academy by any Other Name(s): The Case of Croatia.” Language Policy 10 (4): 343–360.
. 2014. Language Planning and National Identity in Croatia (= Palgrave Studies in Minority Languages and Communities). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Musolff, Andreas. 2006. “Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 21 (1): 23–38.
Musolff, Andreas. 2015. “Dehumanizing Metaphors in UK Immigrant Debates in Press and Online Media.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3 (1): 41–56.
Polzenhagen, Frank, and René Dirven. 2008. “Rationalist or Romantic Model in Globalization?” In Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems, ed. by Gitte Kristiansen and René Dirven, 301–331. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Smith, Anthony D. 2010. Nationalism: Theory, Ideology, History, 2nd ed. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.
Spitzmüller, Jürgen. 2007. “Staking the Claims of Identity: Purism, Linguistics and the Media in post-1990 Germany.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (2): 261–285.
Van Dijk, Teun. 1997. Discourse as Structure and Process: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Van der Horst, Joop. 2008. Het Einde Van De Standardtaal. Een Wisseling Van Europese Taalcultuur. Amsterdam: J.M. Meulenhoff, 2008. Translated by Radovan Lučić (2016) as Propast standardnoga jezika. Zagreb: Srednja Europa.
Vlašić, Marija. 2010. Tradicija purizma u hrvatskom jezikoslovlju [Puristic Tradition in Croatian Linguistics]. Ph.D. thesis, Prague: Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy. [URL] (Accessed 8 August 2016).
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Sewell, Andrew
Čičin-Šain, Višnja
2023. Metaphors and pseudometaphors of language as controversial messages in public discourse about Serbian. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:1 ► pp. 117 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
