Cover not available

In:Metaphor, Nation and Discourse
Edited by Ljiljana Šarić and Mateusz-Milan Stanojević
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 82] 2019
► pp. 101–126

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 4
“Let’s work on our Serbian!”

Standard language ideology, metaphors and discourses about Serbian national identity in the newspaper Politika in 2015

 | University of Oslo
Published online: 20 May 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.82.05ver
Abstract
This chapter explores the use of metaphors in the column “Let’s Safeguard Serbian” in the Serbian newspaper Politika in 2015. In this column, adherents of the standard language ideology offered advice about spelling, loanwords, and syntax as well as regarding the name of the language and preferred alphabet. Drawing on critical discourse analysis and metaphor analysis, I examine the link between prescriptivism and contemporary discourses on Serbian national identity. I argue that most metaphors appearing in texts that fall into “the complaint tradition” (Milroy and Milroy) do not reveal a clear-cut link between prescriptivism and nationalism. However, the complaint tradition also reactivates a rich repository of conventional(ized) metaphors and metonymies that reach back to Romanticism and have much more far-reaching implications ideologically.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.“Let’s work on our Serbian”: The campaign and its reception and relationship to the ideology of the standard language in Serbia
  • 3.What’s in a metaphor? The “complaint tradition” remixed
  • 4.Language as the organic expression of the nation’s character
  • 5.Language and territory: The ideological implications of metonymy
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
References (71)
References
Primary sources
Aničić, Gradimir 2015. “Hleba i jezika.” Politika, 1 September 2015. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brborić, Veljko. 2015. “Kampanja ‘Negujmo srpski jezik’ dala rezultate.” RTS (Radio-Televizija Srbije), 29 November 2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bugarski, Ranko. 2015. “Dezinformacije o Evropskoj jezičkoj povelji.” Politika, 19 October 2015. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Đogo, Gojko. 2015. “Srbe žele prevesti u bosanski narod.” Srna (Novinska agencija Republike Srpske), 24 April 2015. Accessed 3 December 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dragićević, Rajna. 2015a. “Sve je više boraca za nepismenost.” Politika, 3 September 2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. “Samo su misli proste a jezik ne može da bude prost.” Politika, 20 September 2015. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Đurić, Maja. 2015. “Koliko čuvamo srpski jezik: Da li je u toku pravopisni bunt?” N1, 2 December 2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knežević, Marija. 2015. “Prošlo vreme književnog jezika.” Politika, 30 November2015. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kovačević, Miloš. 2015. “O jednakosti srpskog jezika.” Politika, 14 September2015. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Bošnjački nije bosanski.” Politika, 3 June2016. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milanović, Aleksandar. 2015. “Pogled izdaleka. ” Politika, 28 October2015. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miloradović, Sofija. 2015. “Dijalektizmi su u modi.” Politika, 30 September2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrović, Dragoljub. 2015a. “Srpskohrvatski jezik nikad nije postojao.” Politika, 20 October2015. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. “Dogovorimo se o predmetu spora.” Politika, 6 December 2015. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radić, Jovanka. 2015. “Polna ravnopravnost uzmiče pred rodnom.” Politika, 9 November2015. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radovanović, Zoran. 2015. “Tuđice nisu otmene reči.” Politika, 4 September2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radisavljević, Zoran. 2015a. “Srpski jezik se umnožava deljenjem.” Politika, 23 April2015. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. “Potrebna nam je jezička policija.” Politika, 18 July2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simić, Radoje. 2015. “Gde su granice srpskog jezika.” Politika, 2 September2015. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stijović, Rada. 2015. “Kulin ban je pisao ćirilicom.” Politika, 19 September2015. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanasić, Sreto. 2015a. “Treba li nam glagol trebati.” Politika, 25 November2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. “Jeste da smo na Balkanu, ali imamo i svoje.” Politika, 1 December2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vulićević, Marina. 2015a. “Srpski jezik predaje hrvatski lektor.” Interview with Veljko Brborić. Politika, 6 September2015. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. “Sve što smo stvorili čuva se u jeziku.” Interview with Sreto Tanasić. Politika, 13 September2015. Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Secondary sources
Aleksov, Bojan. 2005. “Adamant and Treacherous: Serbian Historians on Religious Conversions.” In Myths and Boundaries in South-Eastern Europe, ed. by Pål Kolstø, 158–190. London: Hurst & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arsenijević, Boban. 2015a. “Trebamo (imati) standard [We Need (to Have) a Standard].” Blog, 16 April2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. “Je suis nepismen [Je Suis Illiterate].” Blog, 22 April2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015c. “Intervju 15 minuta (Interview with Aleksandar Stankov for the Programme 15 Minutes of the News Portal Južne Vesti).” Južne vesti, 20 April2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015d. “Malograđanska normativnost našeg mentaliteta [The Petit Bourgeois Normativity of our Mentality].” Interview with Marjana Stevanović. Danas, 23 April 2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bermel, Neil. 2007. Linguistic Authority, Language Ideology, and Metaphor: The Czech Orthography Wars. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 1999. Language Ideological Debates. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonfiglio, Thomas Paul. 2010. Mother Tongues and Nations: The Invention of the Native Speaker. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breuilly, John. 2008. Introduction to Nations and Nationalism, 2nd ed., by Ernest Gellner, xiii–liv. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bugarski, Ranko. 2004. “Language and Boundaries in the Yugoslav Context.” In Language, Discourse, and Borders in the Yugoslav Successor States, ed. by Helen Kelly-Holmes, and Brigitta Busch, 21–37. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Language, Identity and Borders in the Former Serbo-Croatian Area.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 33 (3): 219–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Thomas. 1970. “The War for a Serbian Language and Orthography.” Harvard Slavic Studies 5: 1–81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ćosić, Pavle. 2015. “Srbi su najnepismeniji narod u Evropi [The Serbs are the Most Illiterate People in Europe].” Balkan Magazin, 26 November 2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goatly, Andrew. 2011. “Conventional Metaphor and the Latent Ideology of Racism.” In Beyond Cognitive Metaphor: Perspectives on Literary Metaphor, ed. by Monika Fludernik, 258–280. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Robert D. [2004] 2008. Language and Identity in the Balkans: Serbo-Croatian and its Disintegration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2008. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Metaphor: Toward a Theoretical Framework.” Critical Discourse Studies 5 (2): 91–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hidalgo-Dowing, Laura, and Blanca Kraljevic-Mujic. 2017. “Metaphor and Persuasion in Commercial Advertising.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language, ed. by Elena Semino, and Zsófia Demjén, 323–336. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilić, Marija. 2012. “Purizam u proučavanju srpskog kao manjinskog jezika: srpsko-mađarski jezički kontakt [Purism in the Study of Serbian as a Minority Language: Serbian-Hungarian Language Contact].” In Jezik i društvo, ed. by Jelena Filipović, and Julijana Vučo, 303–321. Belgrade: Faculty of Philology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Collective Narrative: The Narrative on Croatian Language from Academic to Far-Right Discourses in Serbia.” Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology 1: 49–73.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad. 1987. “On Schleicher and Trees.” In Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Henry M. Hoenigswald, and Linda F. Wiener, 109–113. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2002. Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980a. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1980b. “Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language.” The Journal of Philosophy 77 (8): 453–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, Jeannette. 2015. Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1981. Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 2001. “Language Ideologies and the Consequences of Standardization.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 5 (4): 530–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, James, and Lesley Milroy. [1985] 2012. Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English. 4th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, Anna. 1987. “‘Organic’ and ‘Organism’ in Franz Bopp.” In Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Henry M. Hoenigswald, and Linda F. Wiener, 81–107. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Nineteenth-Century Linguistics, vol. 4, ed. by Giulio Lepschy. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2000. “Political Imagery of Europe: A House Without Exit Doors?” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 21 (3): 216–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust: The Concept of the Body Politic. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 9 (3): 301–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Metaphor and Persuasion in Politics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language, ed. by Elena Semino, and Zsófia Demjén, 309–322. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas, and Jörg Zinken (eds). 2009a. Metaphor and Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. “A Discourse-Centred Perspective on Metaphorical Meaning and Understanding.” In Metaphor and Discourse, ed. by Andreas Musolff, and Jörg Zinken, 1–8. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peti-Stantić, Anita (ed.). 2008. Identitet jezika jezikom izrečen. Zbornik rasprava s okruglog stola o knjizi Roberta D. Greenberga Jezik i identitet na Balkanu [The Identity of Language Told by Language. Proceedings of the Round Table about Language and Identity in the Balkans by Robert D. Greenberg]. Zagreb: Srednja Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrović, Tanja. 2006. “Language Ideologies in Contact: The Case of Refugees from Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina in Serbia.” In Marginal Linguistic Identities: Studies in Slavic Contact and Borderland Varieties, ed. by Dieter Stern, and Christian Voss, 261–274. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Srbija i njen jug. “Južnjački dijalekti” između jezika, kulture i politike [Serbia and its South. “Southern Dialects” between Language, Culture, and Politics].” Belgrade: Fabrika knjiga.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, Günter. 2003. “How Metonymic are Metaphors?” In Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by René Dirven, and Ralf Pörings, 407–434. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radić, Jovanka, and Sofija Miloradović. 2009. “Srpski jezik u kontekstu nacionalnih identiteta – povodom srpske manjine u mađarskoj [Serbian in the Context of National Identities: the Case of the Serbian Minority in Hungary].” Južnoslovenski Filolog 65: 153–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1978. “The Metaphorical Process as Cognition, Imagination, and Feeling.” Critical Inquiry 5 (1): 143–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simonović, Marko. 2015a. “Od danas pišem neznam [From Today on, I Write I Dunno].” Peščanik, 20 April2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. “Redu ne trebaju organi reda [Order Does not Need Organs of Order].” Peščanik, 13 May2015. Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šarić, Ljiljana. 2015. “Metaphors in the Discourse of the National.” Družboslovne Razprave 31 (80): 47–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, Iina Hellsten, and Brigitte Nerlich. 2007. “Discourse Metaphors.” In Body, Language, and Mind. Vol. 2, Sociocultural Situatedness, ed. by René Dirven, Tom Ziemke, Roslyn M. Frank, and Enrique Bernárdez, 363–385. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Čičin-Šain, Višnja
2023. Metaphors and pseudometaphors of language as controversial messages in public discourse about Serbian. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:1 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue