Cover not available

In:Doing Politics: Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourse
Edited by Michael Kranert and Geraldine Horan
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 80] 2018
► pp. 105–126

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 5
Off the record

The transcription of parliamentary debates for political discourse analysis

Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.80.05sha
Abstract
This chapter examines the benefits and drawbacks of using Official Reports, such as the UK House of Commons “Hansard” for political discourse analysis. Previous studies identifying transformations that occur to the oral version of events in the process of constructing Official Reports (e.g. Slembrouck 1992) show that transcribers and editors make significant changes and omissions, raising questions about their suitability for the analysis of parliamentary discourse. Acknowledging the theoretical, analytical and interpretative elements of all transcriptions, I critically appraise different types of political discourse analysis that use UK Official Report data. I conclude with some suggestions about the categories affected by Official Report transformations, and suggest that using this data for the analysis of parliamentary discourse should always be critical and reflexive.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • The Official Report (OR), the Hansard, and the representation of speech in writing
  • Transcription as theory and research practice
  • The benefits and drawbacks of using or data for the analysis of political discourse
  • Does it matter? Can we use the Official Report(s) for analysing political discourse?
  • Notes
  • References
References (41)
References
Antaki, Charles, and Ivan Leudar. 2001. “Recruiting the Record: Using Opponents’ Exact Words in Parliamentary Argumentation.” Text 21 (4): 467–488.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, Stephen R., Peter Kerr, Christopher Byrne, and Liam Stanley. 2014. “Questions to the Prime Minister: A Comparative Study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron.” Parliamentary Affairs 67 (2): 253–280.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayley, Paul, Cinzia Bevitori, and Elizabetta Zoni. 2004. “Threat and Fear in Parliamentary Debates in Britian, Germany and Italy”. In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 185–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 2000. “The Politics of Transcription.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1439–1465.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Pam Wells. 2012. “Adversarial Discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31 (1): 30–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, and Sylvia Shaw. 2016. Gender, Power and Political Speech: Women and Language in the 2015 UK General Election. Basingstoke: Palgrave Pivot UK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carbó, Teresa. 1992. “Towards an Interpretation of Interruptions in Mexican Parliamentary Discourse (1920–60).” Discourse & Society 3 (1): 25–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2014. Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul A. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, Guy. 1990. “Transcribing Infinity: Problems of Context Presentation.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 1–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demmen, Jane, Lesley Jeffries, and Brian Walker. 2018. “Charting the semantics of labour relations in House of Commons debates spanning two hundred years: A study of parliamentary language using corpus linguistic methods and automated semantic tagging.” In Doing Politics. Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourse, edited by Michael Kranert and Geraldine Horan, 81–104. Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture (DAPSAC) 80. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duff, Patricia A., and Celia Roberts. 1997. “The Politics of Transcription; Transcribing Talk: Issues of Representation.” TESOL Quarterly 31 (1): 167–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Isabela Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul. 2014. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. 4th edn. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamilton, Craig, Laura Hidalgo Downing, Robert Cockcroft, and Susan Cockcroft. 2014. Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. 3rd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 2001. “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 12 (4): 451–472.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hughes, Rebecca. 1996. English in Speech and Writing: Investigating Language and Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2013. “Gendering Confrontational Rhetoric: Discursive Disorder in the British and Swedish Parliaments.” Democratization 20 (3): 501–521.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 1986. “Language in the Media: The Construction of the Domains of Public and Private.” Media, Culture & Society 8: 395–419.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langdon, David. 1969. Punch Magazine available at: [URL] (accessed 1 May 2016).
Martin, James. 2014. Politics and Rhetoric: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mollin, Sandra. 2007. “The Hansard Hazard: Gauging the Accuracy of British Parliamentary Transcripts.” Corpora 2 (2): 187–210.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicholas, Sian. 2001. “Churchill’s Radio Imposter?” History Today 51 (2): 5–6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1979. “Transcription as Theory.” In Developmental Pragmatics, ed. by Elinor Ochs, and Bambi Schiefflen, 43–72. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramagobin, Ryan. 2015. “Mhairi Black’s Maiden Speech Hits 10 Million Online Views.” Independent, July 20. [URL].
Reid, Christopher. 2014. “Rhetoric and Parliamentary Leadership – Prime Minister’s Questions.” In Rhetoric in British Politics and Society, ed. by Judi Atkins, Alan Finlayson, James Martin, and Nick Turnbull, 45–57. Basingstoke ; New York: Macmillan Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2010. “Rhetoric of Political Speeches”. In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Veronika Koller, 243–270. Berlin/NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, Sylvia. forthcoming. Women, Language and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2000. “Language, Gender and Floor Apportionment in Political Debates.” Discourse & Society 11 (3): 401–418.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Governed by the Rules? The Female Voice in Parliamentary Debates.” In Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts, ed. by Judith Baxter, 81–102. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shenhav, Shaul R. 2008. “Showing and Telling in Parliamentary Discourse: The Case of Repeated Interjections to Rabin’s Speeches in the Israeli Parliament.” Discourse & Society 19 (2): 223–255.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slembrouck, Stef. 1992. “The Parliamentary Hansard “Verbatim” Report: The Written Construction of Spoken Discourse.” Language and Literature 1 (2): 101–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spary, Carole. 2010. “Disrupting Rituals of Debate in the Indian Parliament.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 16 (3): 338–351.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trewin, J. C. 1952. Printers to the House: The Story of ‘Hansard’. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2000. “On the Analysis of Parliamentary Debates on Immigration.” In The Semiotics of Racism: Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak, 85–103. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vice, John, and Stephen Farrell. 2017. The History of Hansard. London. House of Lords Hansard and the House of Lords Library.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wintour, Patrick. 2011. “Labour Fury as David Cameron Tells Angela Eagle: “Calm Down, Dear”.” Guardian, April 27. [URL].
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Jeffries, Lesley, Fransina Stradling, Alexander von Lünen & Hugo Sanjurjo-González
2023. Hansard at Huddersfield. In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 111], ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Wissik, Tanja
2021. Encoding Interruptions in Parliamentary Data: From Applause to Interjections and Laughter. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative :Issue 14 DOI logo
Demmen, Jane, Lesley Jeffries & Brian Walker
2018. Charting the semantics of labour relations in House of Commons debates spanning two hundred years. In Doing Politics [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 80], ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue