Cover not available

In:Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and functional perspectives
Edited by Jana Pelclová and Wei-lun Lu
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 79] 2018
► pp. 281–302

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF

Chapter 12
Iconicity in independent noun phrases in print advertising

A multimodal perspective

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 8 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.13pel
This chapter studies the interplay of multimodal iconic signs that construct the meaning of independent noun phrases in advertisements promoting food products. The methodology consists in approaching the diagrammatic iconicity found in language through the perspective of Kress and van Leeuwen’s (1996, 2001) analytical framework of multimodal text and the perspective of typeface design and impression variables as described by Henderson, Giese and Cote (2004). The analysis reveals that independent noun phrases iconicize the process of production, the ingredients used, the variety of products, and gustatory perception. The language diagrammatic iconicity in the analyzed advertisements is achieved by a sequential ordering of modifiers that mirrors either chronological order or the order of importance, and by means of figurative language, lexical cohesion, and a lack of explicit syntactic relations. Both typographic and visual iconicity tend to objectify the semantic dimension of the diagrammatic iconicity. At the same time, the visual iconicity mirrors a close spatial relation between the consumer and the product.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Iconicity and its role in advertising
  • 3.Data and methods
  • 4.Results of the investigation
    • 4.1Iconicity of production process
    • 4.2Iconicity of the ingredients used
    • 4.3Iconicity of the variety of products
    • 4.4Iconicity of gustatory perception
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Primary sources
  • References
  • Web pages consulted
References (64)
Primary sources
Food Family Living Tesco. 2013. (September–November).
Specialty Food. 2012. (January–December). [URL].
. 2013. (January–December). [URL].
Tesco realfood. 2013. (February–September).
References
Arens, William F. 2005. Contemporary Advertising. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Finegan Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buijzen, Moniek, and Patti M. Valkenburg. 2004. “Developing a Typology of Humor in Audiovisual Media.” Media Psychology 6: 146–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Celhay, Franck, Jacqueline Boyselle, and Justin Cohen. 2015. “Food Packages and Communication through Typeface Design: the Exoticism of Exotypes.” Food Quality and Preference 39: 157–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Childers, Terry L. and Jeffrey Jass. 2002. “All Dressed Up with Something to Say: Effects of Typeface Semantic Associations on Brand Perceptions and Consumer Memory.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 12: 93–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, Guy. 1992. The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dąbrowski, Jarosław. 2002. “Metaphors in Advertising Texts. A Cognitive Grammar Analysis.” In The Evidence of Literature. Interrogating Texts in English Studies, ed. by Sven-Johan Spånberg, Henryk Kardela, and Gerald Porter, 295–313. Lublin: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cuypere Ludovic, and Klaas Willems. 2008. “Introduction: Naturalness and Iconicity in Language.” In Naturalness and Iconicity in Language, ed. by Klaas Willems, and Ludovic De Cuypere, 1–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doyle, John R., and Paul A. Bottomley. 2004. “Font Appropriateness and Brand Choice.” Journal of Business Research 57: 873–880. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Dressed for the Occasion: Font-product Congruity in the Perception of Logotype.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 16: 112–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dragon, Ric. 2011. “Who Created AIDA.” Integrated Digital Marketing. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enkvist, Erik, Nils. 1981. “Experiential Iconicism in Text Strategy.“ Text 1: 77–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. “Text Strategies: Single, Dual, Multiple. In Language Topics: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, Vol. II, ed. by Ross Steele, and Terry Threadgold, 203–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Andreas. 1999. “Graphological Iconicity in Print Advertising: A Typology.” In Form Miming Meaning. Iconicity in Language and Literature, ed. by Max Nänny, and Olga Fischer, 123–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, and Max Nänny. 1999. “Introduction: Iconicity as a Creative Force in Language Use.” In Form Miming Meaning. Iconicity in Language and Literature, ed. by Max Nänny, and Olga Fischer, xv–xxxvi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giardino, Valeria, and Gabriel Greenberg. 2014. “Introduction: Varieties of Iconicity.” The Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6: 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1990. Syntax. A Functional Typological Introduction. Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjmanis Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. “Isomorphism and the Grammatical Code: Cognitive and Biological Considerations.” In Iconicity in Language, ed. by Raffaele Simone, 47–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, Angela. 2002. The Language of Advertising. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goh, Robbie B. H. 2001. “Iconicity in Advertising Signs. Motive and Method in Miming ‘the Body’.” In The Motivated Sign. Iconicity in Language and Literature 2, ed. by Max Nänny, and Olga Fischer, 189–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gulas, Charles S., and Marc G. Weinberger. 2006. Humor in Advertising. A Comprehensive Analysis. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael, A. K. 1994. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, John (ed.) 1985. Iconicity in Syntax. Proceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June 24–26, 1983. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henderson, Pamela W., Joan L. Giese, and Joseph A. Cote. 2004. “Impression Management Using typeface Design.” Journal of Marketing 68: 60–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermerén, Lars. 1999. English for Sale. A Study of the Language of Advertising. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971. “Quest for the Essence of Language.” In Selected Writings II, ed. by Roman Jakobson, 345–359. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, Mihyun, and Sejung Marina Choi. 2013. “The Effects of Typeface on Advertising and Brand Evaluations: The Role of Semantic Congruence.” The Journal of Advertising and Promotion Research 2 (2): 26–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leciánová, Jana. 2008. “FTAs in U.S. TV Commercials on Cosmetic Products.” Topics in Linguistics 2: 33–38. Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1966. English in Advertising: A Linguistic Study of Advertising in Great Britain. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N., Margaret Deuchar, and Robert Hoogenraad. 1982. English Grammar for Today: A New Introduction. London: Macmillan Press Ltd. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ljungberg, Christiana. 1997. “Iconicity: A Definition.” Iconicity in Language and Literature. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Photographs in Narrative.” In Outside-in – Inside-out, ed. by Constantino Maeder, Olga Fischer, and William J. Herlofsky, 133–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez Lirola, María, and Jan Chovanec. 2012. “The Dream of a Perfect Body Come True: Multimodality in Cosmetic Surgery Advertising.” Discourse & Society 23 (5): 487–507. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marzo, Daniela. 2008. “What Is Iconic about Polysemy? A Contribution to Research on Diagrammatic Transparency.” In Naturalness and Iconicity in Language, ed. by Klaas Willems, and Ludovic De Cuypere, 167–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael S., and David L. Mothersbaugh. 2002. “Effects of Typographic Factors in Advertising-based Persuasion: A General Model and Initial Empirical Tests.” Psychology and Marketing 19: 663–691. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, Greg. 1994. Words in Ads. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Najafian, Maryam. 2011. “The Words behind Images: A Critical Social Semiotic Approach toward Analyzing Advertising.” International Journal of Linguistics 3 (1): 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nöth, Winfried. 2008. “Semiotic Foundations of Natural Linguistics and Diagrammatic Iconicity.” In Naturalness and Iconicity in Language, ed. by Klaas Willems, and Ludovic De Cuypere, 73–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pelclová, Jana. 2011. “Hybridization in American TV Commercials.” Kalbu Studijos/Studies about Languages 19: 89–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders (author), Nathan Houser, and Christian J. Kloesel (eds.) 1992. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piller, Ingrid. 1999. “Iconicity in Brand Names.” In Form Miming Meaning. Iconicity in Language and Literature, ed. by Max Nänny, and Olga Fischer, 325–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Advertising as a Site of Language Contact. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (23): 170–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prado-Alonso, José Carlos. 2008. “The Iconic Function of Full Inversion in English.” In Naturalness and Iconicity in Language, ed. byKlaas Willems, and Ludovic De Cuypere, 149–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Restrepo Boada, María del Rosario. 2014. “Graphic Design Production as a Sign.” Sign Systems Studies 42 (2/3): 308–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rush, Susan. 1998. “The Noun Phrase in Advertising English.” Journal of Pragmatics 29 (2): 155–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sonesson, Göran. 2008. “Prolegomena to a General Theory of Iconicity Considerations on Language, Gesture and Picture.” In Naturalness and Iconicity in Language, ed. by Klaas Willems, and Ludovic De Cuypere, 47–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “From Mimicry to Mime by Way of Mimesis: Reflections on a General Theory of Iconicity.” Sign System Studies 38 (1/4): 18–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speck, Paul Surgi. 1991. “The Humorous Message Taxonomy: A Framework for the Study of Humorous Ads.” Current Issues and Research in Advertising 13 (1–2): 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tantillo, John, Janet Di Lorenzo-Aiss, and Richard E. Mathisen. 1995. “Quantifying Perceived Differences in Type Styles: An Exploratory Study. Psychology & Marketing 12(5): 447–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tellis, Gerard J. 1998. Advertising and Sales Promotion Strategy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urbanová, Ludmila. 2006. “Interaction of Spoken and Written Language in Newspaper Advertising”. In Discourse and Interaction 2, ed. by Renata Povolná, and Olga Dontcheva-Navrátilová, 173–180. Brno: Faculty of Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005a. Introducing Social Semiotics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodward, Gary C., and Robert E. Denton. 2014. Persuasion and Influence in American Life. Long Grove: Waveland Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Web pages consulted
enoxforddictionaries.com
www.myfonts.com
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue