Cover not available

In:Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and functional perspectives
Edited by Jana Pelclová and Wei-lun Lu
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 79] 2018
► pp. 227–258

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF

Chapter 10
Persuasion in academic discourse

Cross-cultural variation in Anglophone and Czech academic book reviews

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 8 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.11don
This chapter studies persuasion in academic book reviews from a cross-cultural perspective. After discussing the rhetorical structure of book reviews, the study explores the strategic means used by the authors of reviews to represent themselves as expert members of the disciplinary community, show authorial involvement, and open a dialogic space for the negotiation of their opinions and views. The analysis of citation practices, personal structures, and evaluation acts is carried out on a corpus of book reviews published in the linguistics journals Journal of English for Academic Purposes and Slovo a Slovesnost. The findings indicate that while both Anglophone and Czech linguists exploit these linguistic means for persuasive purposes, there is cross-cultural variation in their rate of occurrence and rhetorical functions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The genre of academic book reviews
  • 3.Persuasion in book reviews
  • 4.Cross-cultural variation: The Czech and the Anglophone academic discourse traditions
  • 5.Data and methodology
  • 6.Findings and discussion
    • 6.1Rhetorical structure
    • 6.2Citation
    • 6.3Personal structures
    • 6.4Evaluative acts
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (81)
References
Bennett, Karen. 2009. “English academic style manuals: A survey.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8: 43–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bednárek, Monika. 2008. Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based View. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bülow-Møller. 2005. “Persuasion in business negotiation.” In Persuasion across Genres, ed. by Helena Halmari and Tuija Virtanen, 27–58. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chamonikolasová, Jana. 2005. “Comparing the Structures of Academic Texts Written in English and Czech.” In Slovak Studies in English 1, ed. by Maria Huttová, 77–84. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert C. 1992. Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael. 1987. “Cultural Differences in the Organisation of Academic Texts.” Journal of Pragmatics 11: 211–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Čmejrková, Svetla. 1996. “Academic Writing in Czech and in English.” In Academic Writing, ed. by Eija Ventola, and Anna Mauranen, 137–152. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Čmejrková, Svetla, and František Daneš. 1997. “Academic Writing and Cultural Identity: The Case of Czech Academic Writing.” In Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse, ed. by Anna Duzsak, 40–62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diani, Giuliana. 2009. “Reporting and Evaluation in English Book Review Articles: A Cross-Disciplinary Study.” In Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, ed. by Ken Hyland and Giuliana Diani, 87–104. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga. 2012. “Cross-cultural Differences in the Construal of Authorial Voice in the Genre of Diploma Theses.” In Insights into Academic Genres, ed. by Carol Berkenkotter, Vijay K. Bhatia, and Maurizio Gotti, 301–328. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013a. “Authorial Presence in Academic Discourse: Functions of Author-reference Pronouns.” Linguistica Pragensia 23 (1): 9–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. “The Changing Face of Czech Academic Discourse.” In The Semiperiphery of Academic Writing, ed. by Karen Bennett, 39–61. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Cross-cultural Variation in Citation Practices: A Comparative Analysis of Citations in Czech English-medium and International English-medium Linguistics Journals.” In English as a Scientific and Research Language, ed. by Ramon Plo Alastrué, and Carmen Pérez-Llantada, 185–205. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duszak, Anna. 1997. “Cross-cultural Academic Communication: A Discourse Community View.” In Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse, ed. by Anna Duzsak, 11–39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felber, Lynette. 2002. “The Book Review: Scholarly and Editorial Responsibility.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 33 (3): 166–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, Trine Gedde-Dahl and Torodd Kinn. 2006. Academic Voices Across Languages and Disciplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John. 2000. “Discourse Community, Legitimate Peripheral Participation, and the Nonnative-English-speaking Scholar.” TESOL Quarterly 34 (1): 127–150. [URL]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, Lynne. 2004. “The Argument for Using English Specialized Corpora to Understand Academic and Professional Language.” In Discourse in the Professions, ed. by Ulla Connor, and Thomas Upton, 11–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Grammar and the Research Article.” In Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol Chapelle, 2394–2399. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gea Valor, Luisa M. 2000. A Pragmatic Approach to Politeness and Modality in the Book Review Articles. SELL Monograph. Valencia. Universitat de Valencia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannoni, Davide S. 2009. “Negotiating Research Values across Review Genres: A Case Study in Applied Linguistics.” In Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, ed. by Ken Hyland and Giuliana Diani, 17–33. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behavior. Garden City: New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gosden, Hugh. 1993. “Discourse Functions of Subject in Scientific Research Articles.” Applied Linguistics 14: 56–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio. 2009. “Introduction.” In Communality and Individuality in Academic Discourse, ed. by Maurizion Gotti, 9–21. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harwood, Nigel. 2005. “‘We Do Not Seem to Have a Theory … The Theory I Present Here Attempts to Fill This Gap’: Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Academic Writing.” Applied Linguistics 26: 343–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “An Interview-based Study of the Functions of Citations in Academic Writing across Two Disciplines.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (3): 497–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hewings, Ann, Theresa Lillis, and Dimitra Vladimirou. 2010. “Who’s Citing Whose Writings? A Corpus Based Study of Citations as Interpersonal Resource in English Medium National and English Medium International Journals.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 102–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hogan, Michael. 2013. “Persuasion in the Rhetorical Tradition.” In The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice, ed. by James Price Dillard and Lijiang Shen, 2–19. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Geoff Thompson (eds). 1999. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 1998. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. “Academic Attribution: Citation and the Construction of Disciplinary Knowledge.” Applied Linguistics 20 (3): 341–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow, England: London/New York: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Humble Servants of the Discipline? Self-mention in Research Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 18: 207–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Authority and Invisibility: Authorial Identity in Academic Writing.” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1091–1112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004a. “A Convincing Argument: Corpus Analysis and Academic Persuasion.” In Discourse in the Professions, ed. by Ulla Connor and Thomas A. Upton, 87–112. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004b. Disciplinary Discourses. Michigan: University of Michigan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Persuasion, Interaction and the Construction of Knowledge: Representing Self and Others in Research Writing.” International Journal of English Studies 8 (2): 1–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken and Giuliana Diani (eds). 2009. Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken and Carmen Sancho Guinda (eds.) (2012) Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas. 1997. “Persuasion by Inference: Analysis of a Party Political Broadcast.” In Political Linguistics, Special issue of Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11, ed. by Jan Blummaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 121–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 1985. Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreutz, Heinz and Annette Harres. 1997. “Some Observations on the Distribution and Function of Hedging in German and English Academic Writing.” In Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse, ed. by Anna Duzsak, 181–201. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuo, Chih-Hua. 1999. “The Use of Personal Pronouns: Role Relationships in Scientific Journal Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 18 (2): 121–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Livnat, Zohar. 2012. Dialogue, Science and Academic Writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorés Sanz Rosa. 2009. “(Non-)critical Voices in the Reviewing of History Discourse: A Cross-cultural Study of Evaluation.” In Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, ed. by Ken Hylandm and Giuliana Diani, 143–160. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James and Peter White. 2005 The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2000. “Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 1993. “Contrastive ESP Rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English Economic Texts.” English for Specific Purposes 12 (3): 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moreno, Anna I., and Lorena Suarez. 2008. “A Study of Critical Attitude across English and Spanish Academic Book Reviews.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7 (1): 15–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Academic Book Reviews in English and Spanish: Critical Comments and Rhetorical Structure.” In Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, ed. by Ken Hyland, and Giuliana Diani, 161–178. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Motta-Roth, Desirée. 1996. “Same Genre, Different Discipline: A Genre-based Study of Book-reviews in Academe.” The ESPecialist 17 (2): 99–131.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “Discourse Analysis and Academic Book Reviews: A Study of Text and Disciplinary Cultures.” In Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes, ed. by Immaculada Fortanet, Santiago Posteguillo, Juan C. Palmer, and Juan F. Coll, 29–58. Castello de la Plana: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mur-Dueňas, Pilar. 2007. “I/we Focus on …: A Cross-cultural Analysis of Self-mentions in Business Management Research Articles.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6 (2): 143–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Citation in Business Management Research Articles.” In Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse, ed. by Eija Suomela-Salmi, and Fred Dervin, 49–60. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petersen, Margrethe, and Philip Shaw. 2002. “Language and Disciplinary Differences in a Biliterate Context.” World Englishes 21 (3): 357–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Povolná, Renata. 2012. “Cross-cultural Variation in the Degree of Dialogicality in Research Articles: On Some Text-organizing Devices.” In Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse, by Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga, Renata Jančaříková, Gabriela Miššíková, and Renata Povolná, 29–58. Brno: Masaryk University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salager-Mayer, Francoise, and María Angeles Alcaraz Ariza. 2007. “Negative Appraisals in Academic Book Reviews: A Cross-linguistic Approach.” In Intercultural Aspects of Specialized Communication, 2nd ed., ed. by Christopher N. Candlin, and Maurizio Gotti, 149–171. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sancho Guinda, Carmen and Ken Hyland. 2014. Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, Peter. 2004. “How Do We Recognise Implicit Evaluation in Academic Book Reviews.” In Academic Discourse – New Insights into Evaluation, ed. by Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti, and Elena Tognini Bonelli, 121–140. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, Philip. 2006. “Evaluative Language in Evaluative and Promotional Genres.” In Variation in Business and Economic Discourse: Diachronic and Genre Perspactives, ed. by Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti, Marina Dosena, and Belinda Crawford, 152–165. Roma: Officina Edizioni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “The Lexis and Grammar of Explicit Evaluation in Academic Book Reviews, 1913 and 1993.” In Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, ed. by Ken Hyland, and Giuliana Diani, 217–235. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, Philip, and Irena Vassileva. 2009. “Co-evolving Ecademic Rhetoric across Culture: Britain, Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany in the 20th Century.” Journal of Pragmatics 4 (2): 290–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson. 2010. “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind and Language 25: 359–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stašková, Jaroslava. 2005. “Options of Identity: Authorial Presence in Research Articles Abstracts.” In Slovak Studies in English 1, ed. by Maria Huttová, 201–207. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sudková, Marcela. 2012. “Vyjadřování interpersonální funkce v českých a anglických odborných textech. Kontrastivní studie.” [Expressing the interpersonal function in Czech and English academic texts. A contrastive study.] Časopis pro moderní filologie 2012 (1): 31–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Research Genres. Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, Ramona, and Suganthi John. 1999. “The ‘I’ in Identity: Exploring Writer Identity in Student Academic Writing through the First Person Pronoun.” English for Specific Purposes 18: 23–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thieme, Katja. 2010. “Constitutive Rhetoric as an Aspect of Audience Design: The Public Texts of Canadian Suffragists.” Written Communication 27 (1): 36–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2001. “Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning to Argue with the Reader.” Applied Linguistics 22 (1): 58–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff and Susan Hunston. 1999. “Evaluation: An introduction.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanderbiesen, Jeroen. 2016. “Mixed Viewpoints and the Quotative-reportive Cline in German: Reported Speech and Reported Eventuality.” In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen, 41–91. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vassileva, Irena. 1998. “Who Am I/Who Are We in Academic Writing?” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8 (2): 163–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2016. “Introduction: On tools for Weaving Meaning Out of Viewpoint Threads.” In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen, 1–10. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija, and Helena Halmari. 2005. “Persuasion across Genres: Emerging Perspectives.” In Persuasion across Genres, ed. Helena Halmari, and Tuija Virtanen, 3–24. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Alex Ding & Milada (Millie) Walkova
2025. Language in Book Reviews. In Reference Module in Social Sciences, DOI logo
Yuan, Wen, Yue Jin & Yingli Yang
2024. The Influence of Disciplinary Variation and Speaker Characteristics on the Use of Hedges and Boosters in Zhihu Live Talks. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 67:1 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Afful, Joseph Benjamin Archibald, Eugene Kwesi Hesse, Ebenezer Agbaglo & Emmanuel Mensah Bonsu
2023. Persuasive strategies in grant recommendation letters written by senior faculty in a Ghanaian university. ExELL 11:2 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
YAKUT, İlyas & Fatma YUVAYAPAN
2022. LEXICAL BUNDLES ACROSS DISCIPLINES: THE CASE OF RESEARCH ARTICLES IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES. İnönü University International Journal of Social Sciences (INIJOSS) DOI logo
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga, Martin Adam, Renata Povolná & Radek Vogel
2020. Persuasive Strategies Across the Academic, Business, Religious and Technical Discourses. In Persuasion in Specialised Discourses, ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Povolná, Renata
2018. On some persuasive strategies in technical discourse: Cross-cultural analysis of directives in English and Czech technical manuals. Topics in Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Povolná, Renata
2019. CROSS-CULTURAL VARIATION IN THE EXPRESSION OF PERSUASIVE POWER IN THE GENRE OF TECHNICAL MANUALS: THE CASE OF DIRECTIVES. Discourse and Interaction 12:1 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Povolná, Renata
2020. Persuasion in Technical Discourse: The Role of Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in User Manuals. In Persuasion in Specialised Discourses, ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue