In:Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and functional perspectives
Edited by Jana Pelclová and Wei-lun Lu
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 79] 2018
► pp. 207–224
Get fulltext
Chapter 9Constructing the ideal organization
Metaphor in higher education brand communication
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 8 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.10ng
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.10ng
This chapter looks at brand communication and how metaphor relates to the cognitive and functional dimensions of this persuasive communication by way of examining how Singapore’s publicly-funded higher education institutions communicate with their audiences. The chapter highlights the role of animate and anthropomorphic metaphors in communicating ideal(ized) representations of these organizations – typically as dynamic, competitive, and purposefully-motivated actors – in the endeavor to forge affinity with audiences and stakeholders. In doing so, the chapter calls for a view of brand communication that considers not just how such communication seeks to persuade audiences in support of the organization, but also how it encourages audiences to subscribe to the attributes and values that the ideal organization supposedly embodies.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Singapore’s HEIs and persuasive communication
- 3.Metaphor and persuasive communication
- 4.Textual analysis
- 4.1Animation/anthropomorphization in HEI brand communication
- 4.2Analyzing a specific example
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
Notes References
References (38)
Aaker, Jennifer L. 1997. “Dimensions of Brand Personality.” Journal of Marketing Research 34 (3): 347–356.
Balmer, John M. T. 2001. “Corporate Identity, Corporate Branding and Corporate Marketing: Seeing Through the Fog.” European Journal of Marketing 35 (3/4): 248–291.
2012. “Strategic Brand Alignment: Perspectives from Identity Based Views of Corporate Brands.” European Journal of Marketing 46 (7/8): 1064–1092.
Balmer, John M. T., and Edmund R. Gray. 2003. “Corporate Brands: What Are They? What of Them?” European Journal of Marketing 37(7/8): 972–997.
Bhalla, Shobha T. 2005. “SMU – Going From Being Different to Making a Difference.” Today, 8 March: 24.
Birch, Kean, and Vlad Mykhnenko. 2010. “Introduction: A World Turned Right Way Up.” In The Rise and Fall of Neoliberalism: The Collapse of an Economic Order?, ed. by Kean Birch, and Vlad Mykhnenko, 1–20. London: Zed Books.
Brown, Roger. 2011. “The March of the Market.” In The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer, ed. by Mike Molesworth, Richard Scullion, and Elizabeth Nixon, 11–24. London: Routledge.
Cameron, Lynn. 1999. “Operationalising ‘Metaphor’ for Applied Linguistic Research.” In Researching and Applying Metaphor, ed. by Lynn Cameron, and Graham Low, 3–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christensen, Lars T., and Søren Askegaard. 2001. “Corporate Identity and Corporate Image Revisited: A Semiotic Perspective.” European Journal of Marketing 35 (3/4): 292–315.
Chua, Ai L., and Denise Heng. 2008. “CI-QAF – the LATEST BUZZWORD in ITE.” InTunE. [URL]. [Retrieved June, 2015].
Csaba, Fabian F., and Anders Bengtsson. 2006. “Rethinking Identity in Brand Management.” In Brand Culture, ed. by Jonathan E. Schroeder, and Miriam Salzer-Mörling, 118–135. Abingdon: Routledge.
Flowerdew, John. 2004. “The Discursive Construction of a World-Class City.” Discourse & Society 15 (5): 579–605.
Hopkinson, Christopher. This volume. “Saving Face Online: Institutional Responses to Negative Customer Reviews on TripAdvisor
.” In Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and Functional Perspectives, ed. by Jana Pelclová, and Wei-lun, Lu. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kapferer, Jean-Noël. 2004. The New Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term. London: Kogan Page.
Koller, Veronika. 2009a. “Brand Images: Multimodal Metaphor in Corporate Branding Messages.” In Multimodal Metaphor, ed. by Charles Forceville, and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi, 45–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2009b. “Corporate Self-Presentation and Self-Centredness: A Case for Cognitive Critical Discourse Studies.” In Language and Social Cognition: Expression of the Social Mind, ed. by Hanna Pishwa, 267–287. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Leitch, Shirley, and Neil Richardson. 2003. “Corporate Branding in the New Economy.” European Journal of Marketing 37 (7/8): 1065–1079.
Lin, Angel. 2009. “Local Interpretation of Global Management Discourses in Higher Education in Hong Kong: Potential Impact on Academic Culture.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 10 (2): 260–274.
Macmillan Dictionary, s.v. “Robust.” [URL].
Marginson, Simon. 2011. “Higher Education in East Asia and Singapore: Rise of the Confucian Model.” Higher Education 61: 587–611.
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2005. “The Entrepreneurial University: A Discursive Profile of a Higher Education Buzzword.” Critical Discourse Studies 2 (2): 95–120.
Ministry of Education. 2005. Autonomous Universities: Towards Peaks of Excellence. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
Ng, Carl J. W., and Veronika Koller. 2013. “Deliberate Conventional Metaphor in Images: The Case of Corporate Branding Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 28 (3): 131–147.
Pragglejaz Group. 2007. “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1): 1–39.
Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steen, Gerard. 2008. “The Paradox of Metaphor: Why We Need a Three-Dimensional Model of Metaphor.” Metaphor and Symbol 23 (4): 213–241.
. 2011. “What Does ‘Really Deliberate’ Really Mean? More Thoughts on Metaphor and Consciousness.” Metaphor and the Social World 1 (1): 53–56.
