In:Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and functional perspectives
Edited by Jana Pelclová and Wei-lun Lu
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 79] 2018
► pp. 149–178
Get fulltext
Chapter 7Dissuasion by characterization
The “poisoning” of an heroic analogy in Russian public discourse
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 8 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.08abe
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.08abe
The chapter examines public attitudes provoked by the nickname “Joan of Arc” in the Russian press. It argues that media discussions of Joan of Arc’s personality type have activated various prejudices among reporters and readers who tend to stigmatize strong-willed, independent, and self-confident women, such as Russian female oppositionists defying Putin’s regime. Ultimately these media discussions serve to discredit a movement that endangers the political elite. This chapter is a multidisciplinary investigation of the mechanism of dissuasion, combining framing theory, appraisal theory, and several approaches in metaphor research. The chapter looks at the discourse processes and argumentative techniques engendering evaluative shifts in reading this analogy. The reception-oriented analysis shows that this poisoned analogy has affected readers. Judging from remarks in the comments sections of newspapers, discourse participants tend to reproduce and reinforce most of the authorial disparaging cues.
Keywords: frame, allusion, dissuasion, appraisal, authorial distancing, irony, characterization
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Research framework
- 3.Research design
- 4.Biographies: Similarities and dissimilarities
- 5.Components of the interpretative frame
- 6.Inviting negative judgement: Mechanisms of stigmatization
- 6.1Ironic reversal
- 6.2Dissociation from positive attribution
- 6.3Amplifying problematic traits of the prototype
- 6.4Gender prejudice
- 7.Reception-oriented analysis
- 8.Discussion: Persuasive impact
- 9.Conclusion
References
References (51)
A’Beckett, Ludmilla. 2012. “The Play of Voices in Metaphor Discourse: A Case Study of ‘NATIONS ARE BROTHERS’.” Metaphor and Symbol 27 (2): 171–194.
. 2013a. “Cross-cultural Allusions in the Russian Press: Parallels between Joan of Arc and the Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko.” Foreign Language Studies 19: 101–132.
. 2013b. “Strategies to Discredit Opponents: Russian Presentations of Events in Countries of the Former Soviet Union.” Psychology of Language and Communication 17 (2): 133–156.
. 2013c. “The Joan of Arc Figures in Russian Discourse: Gender Prejudice against Women in Public Life.” Transcultural Studies: A Series in Interdisciplinary Research 9 (1–2): 113–129.
. 2014. Review of Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistic, Social Sciences and the Humanities
, by Lynne Cameron and Robert Maslen (eds.). Metaphor and the Social World 4 (1): 127–138.
Alexander, Richard. 2009. Framing Discourse on the Environment: A Critical Discourse Approach. New York: Routledge.
Amnesty International. 2011. “Jailed Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Must Be Released.” (11 October). [URL].
Amos, Howard. 2012. “Q&A: Tina Kandelaki Wants Russia to Have Style.” The Moscow Times. (8 June). [URL].
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination, trans. by Caryl Emerson, and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Barnden, John. 2012. “Metaphor and Simile: Fallacies Concerning Comparison, Ellipsis, and Inter-Paraphrase.” Metaphor and Symbol 27 (4): 265–283.
BBC Monitoring. 2008. “The Press in Russia.” BBC News, Europe. (16 May). [URL].
. 2014. “Ukraine Woman Pilot Savchenko in Middle of Media War.” BBC News, Europe. (10 July). [URL]
Bednarek, Monica. 2006. Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.
Cameron, Lynne. 2010a. “What is Metaphor and Why Does It Matter?” In Metaphor Analysis, ed. Lynne Cameron, and Robert Maslen, 3–26.London: Equinoxю.
. 2010b. “The Discourse Dynamics Framework for Metaphor.” In Metaphor Analysis, ed. by Lynne Cameron, and Robert Maslen, 77–97. London: Equinox.
Erofeyev, Viktor. 2012. “Жениться на Жанне д’Арк?” [To marry Joan of Arc?]. Komsomol’skaia Pravda. (6 January). [URL].
Gamson, William A., and Kathryn Lasch. 1983. “The Political Culture of Social Welfare Policy.” In Evaluating the Welfare State: Social and Political Perspectives, ed. by Spiro E. Shimon, and Ephraim Yutchman-Yaar, 397–415. New York: Academic Press.
Giora, Rachel. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context and Figurative Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Horvath, Robert. 2011. “Putin’s ‘Preventive Counter-revolution’: Post-Soviet Authoritarianism and the Spectre of Velvet Revolution.” Europe-Asia Studies 63 (1): 1–25.
Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2013. “Speaking to Europe: A Rhetorical Approach to Prime Minister Tony Blair’s Speech to the EU Parliament.” In Speaking of Europe, ed. by Kjersti Flottum, 19–43. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2010. “A New Look at Metaphorical Creativity in Cognitive Linguistics.” Cognitive linguistics 21 (4): 663–697.
Lipovskaia, Olga. 1994. “The Mythology of Womanhood in Contemporary ‘Soviet’ Culture.” In Women in Russia: A New Era in Russian Feminism, ed. by Anastasia Posadskaya, 123–134. London: Verso.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Lu, Wei-lun. 2008. “From Textual Prompts to Cognitive Models: A Context-oriented Perspective on Metaphor Interpretation in Taiwanese Presidential Speeches.” Language and Linguistics 9 (2): 341–358.
Macgilchrist, Felicitas. 2007. “Positive Discourse Analysis: Contesting Dominant Discourses by Reframing the Issues.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 1 (1): 74–94.
Martin, James R., and White, Peter R. R. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York, NY: Palgrave.
Meier, Andrew. 2012. “Ksenia Sobchak, the Stiletto in Putin’s Side.” The New York Times. (July 3). [URL].
. 2013. “The Heart of Europe: Synchronic Variation and Historical Trajectories of a Political Metaphor.” In Speaking of Europe, ed. by Kjersti Flottum, 135–151. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2014. “Metaphors: Sources forIintercultural Misunderstanding?” nternational Journal of Language and Culture 1 (1): 42–59.
Ng, Carl J. W., and Veronika Koller. 2013. “Deliberate Conventional Metaphor in Images: The Case of Corporate Branding Discourse. ” Metaphor and Symbol 28 (3): 131–147.
Osborn, Andrew. 2011. “Bloggers Who are Changing the Face of Russia as the Snow Revolution Takes Hold.” The Telegraph. (10 December). [URL].
Pettey, Gary R., and Richard M. Perloff. 2008. “Creating a Climate of Safer Sex: Making Efficacious Actions Possible.” In Adapting Cultural Communication to Cultural Needs, ed. by Piet Swanopoel and Hans Hocken, 31–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ponton, Douglas. 2010. “The Female Political Leader: A Study of Gender Identity in the Case of Margaret Thatcher.” Journal of Language and Politics 9 (2): 195–218.
Popa, Diana. 2013. “Multimodal Metaphors in Political Entertainment.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11 (2): 303–319.
Porto, M. Dolores, and Manuela Romano. 2013. “Newspaper Metaphors: Reusing Metaphors across Media Genres.” Metaphor and Symbol 28 (1): 60–73.
. 2007. “Gateshead Revisited: Perceptual Simulators and Fields of Meaning in the Analysis of Metaphors.” Metaphor and Symbol 23 (1): 24–49.
Robins, Shani, and Richard E. Mayer. 2000. “The Metaphor Framing Effect: Metaphorical Reasoning about Text-based Dilemmas.” Discourse Processes 30 (1): 57–86.
Sperling, Valerie. 2015. Sex, Politics and Putin. Political Legitimacy in Russia. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Spiegel Online International. 2012. “Putin’s Famous Enemy: Opposition in Russia Gaining High Profile Support.” (June 11. )[URL].
Svensson, Peter, and Dag Stenvoll. 2013. “Risky Readings: The Virtue of Overinterpretations and Speculations in Political Discourse Analysis.” In Speaking of Europe, ed. by Kjersti Flottum, 171–189. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Todd, Zazie, and Graham Low. 2010. “A Selective Survey of Research Practice in Published Studies Using Metaphor Analysis”. In Metaphor Analysis, ed. by Lynne Cameron, and Robert Maslen, 26–44. London: Equinox.
The Economist 2011. “Ukrainian justice: Don’t cross Viktor”. (13 August). [URL]
White, Gregory L. 2011. Wrapped up in Russia’s ‘Mink’ Revolution. The Wall Stree Journal. (17 December). [URL].
