Cover not available

In:Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and functional perspectives
Edited by Jana Pelclová and Wei-lun Lu
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 79] 2018
► pp. 43–62

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF

Chapter 2
Construction of the speaker’s persuasive image in public discourse

Classical rhetoric revisited

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 8 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.03zma
This chapter presents Greco-Roman conceptualizations of rhetorical ethos in order to show that classical rhetoric, when properly reconstructed in the framework of its (relevant) sociocultural context, can fruitfully contribute to the research and analysis of persuasive strategies in contemporary public discourse. A reconstruction of a model for analysis of rhetorical ethos is proposed and applied to selected contemporary data. The analysis presents a case study of persuasion through character in formal addresses of Slovenian Prime Minister-designates. Two issues are explored in particular: (1) the relevance of rhetorical ethos as a persuasive strategy and (2) the characteristics of rhetorical ethos in these speeches.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Rhetoric and persuasion
  • 2.Rhetorical ethos – a theoretical background
  • 3.Analysis: Towards characteristics of rhetorical ethos in Slovenian political rhetoric
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
References (41)
Sources
Transcription of the first extraordinary session of the Slovenian National Assembly, November 9, 2004:[URL] (retrieved February 9, 2009).
Transcription of the first extraordinary session of the Slovenian National Assembly, November 7, 2008:[URL] (retrieved February 9, 2009).
References
Amossy, Ruth. 2001. “Ethos at the Crossroads of Disciplines: Rhetoric, Pragmatics, Sociology.” Poetics Today 22 (1): 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Argumentation in Discourse: A Socio-discursive Approach to Arguments.” Informal Logic 29 (3): 252–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aristotle. (2006). Art of Rhetoric, trans. by John Henry Freese. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blair, Anthony J. 2012. “Argumentation as Rational Persuasion.” Argumentation 26: 71–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. 2004. The Rhetoric of RHETORIC: The Quest for Effective Communication. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Alan. 1986. “Ethotic argument.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 3: 245–258.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buxton, Richard G. A. 1982. Persuasion in Greek Tragedy. A Study of Peitho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cicero. 19541 (1999repr.). Rhetorica ad Herennium. With an English Translation by Harry Caplan. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conley, Thomas M. 1990. Rhetoric in the European Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Edward P. J., and Robert J. Connors. 1999. Classi1cal Rhetoric for the Modern Student, 4th ed. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fahnestock, Jeanne. 1999. Rhetorical Figures in Science. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halmari, Helena, and Tuija Virtanen (eds.). 2005. Persuasion across Genres. A Linguistic Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isocrates. 1963. Isocrates with an English Translation in Three Volumes by George Norlin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Karlyn Kohrs Campbell. 1982. “Rhetorical Hybrids: Fusion of Generic Elements.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 68 (2): 146–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. 1963. The Art of Persuasion in Greece. New Jersey, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1972. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World 300 B.C.–A. D. 300. New Jersey, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. Comparative Rhetoric. An Historical and Cross-cultural Introduction. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas. 2009. “The Democratic Narcissus: The Agonism of the Ancients Compared to that of the (Post)moderns.” In Law and Agonistic Politics, ed. by Andrew Schaap, 15–41. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kohrs Campbell, Karlyn, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 1985. “Inaugurating the Presidency.” Presidential Studies Quaterly 15 (2): 394–411.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leff, Michael. 2003. “Rhetoric and Dialectic in Martin Luther King’s ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail.” In Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 255–268. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Perelman, ad Hominem Argument, and Rhetorical Ethos.” Argumentation 23: 301–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lunsford, Andrea A., Kirt H. Wilson, and Rosa A. Eberly (eds.) 2009. The SAGE Handbook of Rhetorical Studies. London and New Delhi: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
May, James M. 1988. Trials of Character. The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Daniel J. 2002. Persuasion: Theory and Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola. 2005. “Persuasion as Implicit Anchoring: The Case of Collocations.” In Persuasion across Genres. A Linguistic Approach, ed. by Helena Halmari, and Tuija Virtanen, 183–212. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plato. 1925. Lysis. Symposium. Gorgias. Volume III, trans. by Walter R. M. Lamb, Loeb Classical Library 166. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubinelli, Sara. 2009. Ars Topica: The Classical Technique of Constructing Arguments from Aristotle to Cicero. Argumentation Library, 15. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tindale, Cristopher W. 1999. Acts of Arguing. A Rhetorical Model of Argument. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Rhetorical Argumentation: Principles of Theory and Practice. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, Francisca A. Snoeck, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans (eds.) 2014. Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2007. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Ideology in Language Use. Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas. 1998. Ad Hominem Arguments. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Christopher Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wisse, Jakob. 1989. Ethos and Pathos from Aristotle to Cicero. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Žmavc, Janja. 2009. “Govorniške zvrsti in sredstva prepričevanja v zgodnji rimski retoriki: metaretorika v nastajanju [Branches of Oratory and Rhetorical Means of Persuasion in Early Roman Rhetoric].” Annales. Series Historia et Sociologia 19 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “The Ethos of Classical Rhetoric: From Epieikeia to Auctoritas.” In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies, Vol. 22, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, and Bart Garssen, 181–191. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Khafaga, Ayman
2024. Imperatives as persuasion strategies in political discourse. Linguistics Vanguard 9:1 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Afful, Joseph Benjamin Archibald, Eugene Kwesi Hesse, Ebenezer Agbaglo & Emmanuel Mensah Bonsu
2023. Persuasive strategies in grant recommendation letters written by senior faculty in a Ghanaian university. ExELL 11:2 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue