In:The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal - group - collective
Edited by Birte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin and Nuria Hernández
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 78] 2018
► pp. 227–248
Get fulltext
“And you know, Jeremy, my father came from a very poor background indeed”
Collective identities and the private-public interface in political discourse
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 23 July 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.78.10fet
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.78.10fet
Abstract
This chapter examines the discursive construction of identity in political discourse and considers collective identities as the default in that context. It utilises an integrated approach informed by interactional sociolinguistics and discourse pragmatics. Departing from the premise that discursive identities are co-constructed, reconstructed and – possibly – deconstructed in and through the process of communication, it focuses on those contexts in which political agents depart from the default by entextualising non-collective identities, e.g., private-domain-anchored family person or ordinary citizen. The ‘doing’ and ‘undoing’ of discursive identities in discourse is reflected in the importation of private-domain-anchored communicative styles and genres, such as colloquial expressions and small stories, contributing to the ongoing process of hybridisation of institutional discourse in general and political discourse in particular. The discursive construction, re- and deconstruction of identities in political discourse is a multifaceted endeavour which exploits the structural, pragmatic and cognitive constraints of a discourse genre as well as those of institution and society.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Constructing, reconstructing and deconstructing identities in discourse
- 3.Political discourse in context
- 3.1Political discourse: Public, mediated and ‘on record’
- 3.2Political discourse and political identities
- 3.3Hybridities in mediated political worlds
- 4.Conclusion
Notes References
References (38)
Arundale, R. B. (2006). Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, 2(2): 193–216.
Atifi, H., & Marcoccia, M. (2015). Follow-ups and dialogue in online discussions on French politics: From internet forums to social TV. In A. Fetzer, E. Weizman, & L. N. Berlin (Eds.), The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups (pp. 109–140). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bolander, B., & Locher, M. A. (2010). Constructing identity on Facebook: Report on a pilot study. In K. Junod, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Performing the Self (pp. 165–187). Tübingen: Narr.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5): 585–614.
Bull, P., & Fetzer, A. (2006). Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews. Text & Talk, 26(1): 1–36.
Chilton, P., & Schäffner, C. (2002). Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse. In P. Chilton, & C. Schäffner (Eds.), Politics as Text and Talk: Analytical Approaches to Political Discourse (pp. 1–41). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1): 43–63.
Duranti, A. (2006). Narrating the political self in a campaign for U.S. Congress. Language in Society, 35(4): 467–497.
(1998). Political discourse in the media: An analytical framework. In A. Bell, & P. Garret (Eds.), Approaches to Media Discourse (pp. 142–162). Oxford: Blackwell.
Fetzer, A. (1999). Non-acceptances: Re- or un-creating context. In P. Bouquet, P. Brezillon, & L. Serafini (Eds.), Second International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context (Context’99) (pp. 133–144). Heidelberg: Springer.
(2002). ‘Put bluntly, you have something of a credibility problem’: Sincerity and credibility in political interviews. In P. Chilton, & C. Schäffner (Eds.), Politics as Talk and Text: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse (pp. 173–201). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2006). ‘Minister, we will see how the public judges you’: Media references in political interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(2): 180–195.
(2010). Small stories in political discourse: The public self goes private. In C. Hoffman (Ed.), Narratives Revisited (pp. 163–183). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(Ed.). (2013). The Pragmatics of Political Discourse: Explorations Across Cultures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2014). Foregrounding evidentiality in (English) academic discourse: Patterned co-occurrences of the sensory perception verbs seem and appear. Intercultural Pragmatics, 11(3): 333–355.
Fetzer, A., & Bull, P. (2012). Doing leadership in political speech: Semantic processes and pragmatic inferences. Discourse & Society, 23(2): 127–144.
Fetzer, A., & Weizman, E. (2006). Political discourse as mediated and public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(2): 143–153.
(2015). Introduction. In E. Weizman, & A. Fetzer (Eds.), Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations Across Discourse Domains (pp. vii–xvii). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gumperz, J. J. (1996). The linguistic and cultural relativity of inference. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 374–406). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iedema, R., & Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. (2008). Introduction: Identity trouble: Critical discourse and contested identities. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard, & R. Iedema (Eds.), Identity Trouble: Critical Discourse and Contested Identities (pp. 1–14). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lauerbach, G. E., & Fetzer A. (2007). Political discourse in the media: Cross-cultural perspectives. In A. Fetzer, & G. E. Lauerbach (Eds.), Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 3–28). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lemke, J. R. (2008). Identity, development and desire: Critical questions. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard, & R. Iedema (Eds.), Identity Trouble: Critical Discourse and Contested Identities (pp. 17–42). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching Dialogue. Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Park, J., & Bucholtz, M. (2009). Public transcripts: Entextualization and linguistic representation in institutional contexts. Text & Talk, 29(5): 485–502.
Scannell, P. (1998). Media–language–world. In A. Bell, & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to Media Discourse (pp. 252–267). Oxford: Blackwell.
Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weizmann, E. (2008). Positioning in Media Dialogue: Negotiating Roles in the News Interview. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Fetzer, Anita
Fetzer, Anita
2024. Quotation headlines in the printed British quality press. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
Kopf, Susanne
2019. From ‘country’ to ‘confederation’ – debating terms of reference for the EU on a Wikipedia talk page. In Reference and Identity in Public Discourses [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 306], ► pp. 159 ff.
Weizman, Elda & Anita Fetzer
2019. Introduction. In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 307], ► pp. 1 ff.
Fetzer, Anita & Elda Weizman
Kleinke, Sonja, Nuria Hernández & Birte Bös
2018. Introduction. In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 78], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
