In:The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal - group - collective
Edited by Birte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin and Nuria Hernández
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 78] 2018
► pp. 57–80
Get fulltext
Constructing personal identities online
Self-disclosure in popular blogs
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 23 July 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.78.03sal
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.78.03sal
Abstract
The current study aims to discern how identities are built within a sample of ten popular personal blogs and to depict the varieties of identities that emerge. The focus is placed on the diversity of topics disclosed by the bloggers (the breadth of self-disclosure) and the context-bound personal identities that are constructed through this process. The material employs Gee’s (2011) classification of I-statements and Bucholtz and Hall’s (2005, 2008) theorization of interaction and identity. The analysis shows that the topics disclosed in the blogs elucidate facets of online identity supported and created by interaction with the audience, and that a close examination of self-disclosure provides a fruitful approach to studying online identity construction.
Keywords: digital discourse, identity, self-disclosure, I-statements
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background and research aims
- 3.Material
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Breadth of disclosure
- 4.2Constructing specific identities through self-disclosure
- 4.2.1Average Girl and a blogger identity
- 4.2.2Bitchy Waiter and situational identities
- 4.2.3Pole to Sole and a survivor identity
- 5.Conclusions
Notes References
References (50)
Primary sources
A Southerner in San Francisco. Retrieved from [URL]
Average Girl. Retrieved from [URL]
Bitchy Waiter. Retrieved from [URL]
Divine Secrets of Domestic Diva. Retrieved from [URL]
Djenne Djenno. Retrieved from [URL]
Menopausal Man. Retrieved from [URL]
My Husband is Annoying. Retrieved from: [URL]
Pole to Sole. Retrieved from [URL]
The Everywhereist. Retrieved from [URL]
Woogsworld. Retrieved from [URL]
Secondary sources
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2): 191–215.
Blogger. (2014). Blogs of Note. Retrieved from [URL]
Bolander, B., & Locher, M. A. (2014). Doing sociolinguistic research on computer-mediated data: A review of four methodological issues. Discourse, Context and Media, 3: 14–26.
Bronstein, J. (2013). Personal blogs as online presences on the Internet: Exploring self-presentation and self-disclosure in blogging. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 65(2): 161–181.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5): 585–614.
Chen, G. M. (2012). Why do women write personal blogs? Satisfying needs for self-disclosure and affiliation tell part of the story. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28(1): 171–180.
Cho, S. H. (2007). Effects of motivations and gender on adolescents’ self-disclosure in online chatting. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 10(3): 339–345.
Choi, Y. K., Yoon, S., & Lacey, H. P. (2013). Online game characters’ influence on brand trust: Self-disclosure, group membership, and product type. Journal of Business Research, 66(8): 996–1003.
Ess, C., & the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (2002). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. Retrieved from [URL]
Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on Internet communities. British Medical Journal, 323: 1103–1105.
Gee, J. P. (2011). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method (3rd ed.). London/New York: Routledge.
Greene, K., Derlega, V. J., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti, & D. Perlman (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 409–427). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herring, S. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behaviour. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.). Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 338–376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herring, S., Kouper, I., Paolillo, J., Scheidt, L., Tyworth, M., Wright, E., & Yu, N. (2005). Conversations in the blogsphere: An analysis ‘from the bottom up’. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, IEEE Press. Retrieved from [URL]
Holtgraves, T. (1990). The language of self-disclosure. In H. Giles, & P. W. Robinson (Eds.). Handbook of Language and Social Psychology (pp. 191–207). New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Jang, C. Y., & Stefanone, M. A. (2011). Non-directed self-disclosure in the blogosphere. Information, Communication and Society, 14(7): 1039–1059.
Jaszczcolt, K. M. (2013). First-person reference in discourse: Aims and strategies. Journal of Pragmatics, 48(1): 57–70.
Jorgensen, S. R., & Gaudy, J. C. (1980). Self-disclosure and satisfaction in marriage: The relation examined. Family Relations, 29(3): 281–287.
Ledbetter, A. M., Mazer, J. P., DeGroot, J. M., Meyer, K. R., Yuping, M., & Swafford, B. (2011). Attitudes toward online social connection and self-disclosure as predictors of Facebook communication and relational closeness. Communication Research, 38(1): 27–53.
Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Class and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Markham, A., Buchanan, E., & the AoIR Ethics Committee. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (version 2.0). Retrieved from [URL]
Moore, S. (2004). Personality and intelligence. In G. Davey (Ed.). Complete Psychology (pp. 452–542). London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Nardi, A., Schiano, D. J., Gumbrecht, M., & Swartz, L. (2004). Why we blog. Communications of the ACM, 47(12): 41–46.
Niederhoffer, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2009). Sharing one’s story: On the benefits of writing or talking about emotional experience. In S. J. Lopez, & C. R. Snyde (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 621–632). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Palander-Collin, M. (2011). Variation and change in pattern of self-reference in early English correspondence. In J. Culpeper (Ed.). Historical Sociopragmatics (pp. 83–108). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Qian, H., & Scott, C. R. (2007). Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4): 1428–1451.
Schiffrin, H., Edelman, A., Falkenstern, M., & Stewart, C. (2010). The associations among computer-mediated communication, relationships, and well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 13(3): 299–306.
Stefanone, M., & Jang, C. Y. (2007). Writing for friends and family: The interpersonal nature of blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1): 123–140.
Tang, J. -H., & Wang, C. -C. (2012). Self-disclosure among bloggers: Re-examination of social penetration theory. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking, 15(5): 245–250.
Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K. (Eds.). (2011). Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
TIME Magazine. (2014). The 25 Best Bloggers, 2013 Edition. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
De Cock, Barbara
2019. To be or not to be … a patient. In Reference and Identity in Public Discourses [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 306], ► pp. 205 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
