Cover not available

In:Representing the Other in European Media Discourses
Edited by Jan Chovanec and Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 74] 2017
► pp. 55–80

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 2
Togetherness or othering?

community and comunità in the UK and Italian press

Published online: 23 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.74.03tay
Abstract
This chapter addresses the theme of othering by reporting on preliminary work from a European project aimed at building a dictionary of migration discourse keywords. The chapter investigates the use of the terms COMMUNITY and comunità in two British and Italian newspapers (Guardian, Times, Repubblica, Corriere della Sera) using corpus-assisted discourse analysis. In the first stage, it shows how these terms are interpreted as keywords of migration discourse. In the second, it examines the evaluative weighting of these lexical items. Contrary to previous work (e.g. Williams, 1983; Gallissot, 2007), it is shown here that the terms COMMUNITY and comunità are actually used as part of a pattern of othering, when employed in the context of migration discourse.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Discourse keywords
    • 1.2Previous research into community and comunità
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1A corpus-assisted discourse studies approach
    • 2.2Corpora and tools
      • 2.2.1Corpora
      • 2.2.2Corpus tools
  • 3. community and comunità as discourse keywords of migration
    • 3.1Peaks in use
    • 3.2Association with migration-related terms
    • 3.3Meta-discussion of community and comunità
  • 4.Collocational analysis of community and comunità
    • 4.1 Community identities: Minority groups
    • 4.2United and/or isolated?
    • 4.3Counting communities
    • 4.4Established communities
    • 4.5Countering the corroboration drive: Are we a community?
      • 4.5.1British and Italian
      • 4.5.2Our community
    • 4.6 Communities and societies
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (36)
References
Baker, Paul. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). Using Corpora to Analyse Gender. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos and Tony McEnery (2013). Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bogetić, Ksenia (2013). Normal straight gays: Lexical collocations and ideologies of masculinity in personal ads of Serbian gay teenagers. Gender and Language 7 (3), 333–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durant, Alan. (2008). ‘The significance is in the selection’: Identifying contemporary keywords. Critical Quarterly 50(1–2), 122–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, John R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics, 1934–1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freake, Rachelle, Guillaume Gentil and Jaffer Sheyholislami (2011). A bilingual corpus-assisted discourse study of the construction of nationhood and belonging in Quebec. Discourse and Society 22 (11), 21–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas (forthcoming). Keyness analysis: nature, metric and techniques. In Taylor, Charlotte and Anna Marchi (eds.). Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A critical review. London: Routledge.
Gallissot, René, Mondher Kilani and Annamaria Rivera (2007). L’Imbroglio Etnico in Quattordici Parole-Chiave (3rd Edition). Bari: Edizioni Dedalo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardie, Andrew. (2012). CQPweb – combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (3), 380–409.
Jakubíček, Miloš, Adam Kilgarriff, Vojtěch Kovář, Pavel Rychlý and Vít Suchomel (2013). The TenTen Corpus Family. Paper presented at Corpus Linguistics Conference July 2013, Lancaster.
Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychlý, Pavel Smrž and David Tugwell. (2004). The Sketch Engine. Proceedings of EURALEX 2004, Lorient, France; pp. 105–116. [URL]
Krishnamurthy, Ramesh (1996). Ethnic, racial and tribal: The language of racism? In: Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen Rosa and Malcolm Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and Practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lexical Computing (2014). Statistics used in the Sketch Engine. July 22 2014, available from [URL].
Louw, Bill (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In: Baker, Mona, Gill Francis and Elena Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.) Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 157–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchi, Anna and Charlotte Taylor (2009). If on a winter’s night two researchers… A challenge to assumptions of soundness of interpretation. Critical Approaches to Discoures Analysis across Disciplines CADAAD Journal 3 (1), 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde (1995). (published under the name of “Hardt-Mautner”) Only connect: Critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics, UCREL Technical Paper 6. Lancaster: University of Lancaster. Available at [URL]
(2009). Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In: Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer (Eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, pp. 122–143.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony and Andrew Hardie (2011). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morley, John and Alan Partington (2009). A few Frequently Asked Questions about semantic – or evaluative – prosody. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (2), 139–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, Amanda C. (2011). Oh! What a humanitarian war! A comparative corpus-assisted study of humanitarian/umanitario in English and Italian opinion articles. Analisi linguistica e letteraria 1, 33–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay (2010). How to use corpus linguistics in the study of media discourse. In: O’Keeffe, Anne and Michael McCarthy (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 563–577. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan (2004). Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast. In: Partington, Alan, John Morley and Louann Haarman (Eds.) Corpora and Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 11–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Evaluative prosody. In: Aijmer, Karin and Christoph Rühlemann (Eds.) Corpus Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–303.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Mike and Christopher Tribble (2006). Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education (Vol. 22). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael (1996). Text and Corpus Analysis: Corpus-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Words and Phrases. Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Three concepts of keywords. In: Bondi, Marina and Mike Scott (Eds.) Keyness in Texts: Corpus Linguistic Investigations. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 21–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte (2009). The representation of immigrants in the Italian press. CirCap Occasional Papers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vessey, Rachelle (2013). Challenges in cross-linguistic corpus-assisted discourse studies. Corpora, 8(1), pp. 1–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond (1983). Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (second edition). London: Fontana Paperbacks.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Kaunert, Christian, Joana de Deus Pereira & Mike Edwards
2022. Thick Europe, ontological security and parochial Europe: the re-emergence of far-right extremism and terrorism after the refugee crisis of 2015. European Politics and Society 23:1 ► pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Bednarek, Monika & Stefan Th. Gries
2020. Invisible or high-risk: Computer-assisted discourse analysis of references to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people(s) and issues in a newspaper corpus about diabetes. PLOS ONE 15:6 ► pp. e0234486 ff. DOI logo
Taylor, Charlotte & Dario del Fante*
2020. Comparing across languages in corpus and discourse analysis: some issues and approaches. Meta 65:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Schröter, Melani, Marie Veniard, Charlotte Taylor & Andreas Blätte
2019. A comparative analysis of the keyword multicultural(ism) in French, British, German and Italian migration discourse. In Migration and Media [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 81], ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue